U.S. Customs & Boarder Protection
Criminal Conduct & Personal Conduct
Favorable Decision From Written Response
Florida
May 18, 2018

The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable adjudication from a Written Response to Eligibility that was issued to our client for domestic violence issues and speeding tickets. His Eligibility for Employment was being denied due to these allegations. Our client is 36 years old and has been a government employee for over 16 years.

He called our office because he had been told by several people that “you don’t stand a chance” of getting his job. The staff at The  Edmunds Law Firm saw things differently. WE created and drafted a long response that mitigated the government concerns and showed the favorable aspects of our client’s prior service and accomplishments.

Attorney Alan Edmunds is known across the country as a “fighter in the courtroom”. He is equally passionate about Response to SOR and Notice of Intent or Notice of Eligibility. We never work from a premise that the case is “bad” or too tough to win.

The Firm has offices across the United States and helps Active Duty Military, DoD employees and Contractors deployed around the globe. Case reviews appear on nationalsecurityclearances.com  and Mr. Edmunds can be reached at 571.527.4925.

Iraq
Clearance Granted Following Hearing
Guideline B : Foreign Influence
Arlington, VA
May 2018

Attorney Alan Edmunds appeared at a contested Hearing involving a security clearance applicant with ties to Iraq. Attorney Edmunds has successfully helped linguists from all parts of the world. He has over 40 years of military law and national security clearance law experience. He is this country leading Security Clearance Lawyer who has offices coast to coast. His attorneys, part of the litigation team at The Edmunds Law Firm,  travel to all states and some foreign countries fighting for their clients in the area of national security clearance matters. He has been referred to as “the tiger in the courtroom “.

In this case Attorney Edmunds represented a 61 year old female linguist who had relatives, property and some former ties to Iraq. Edmunds showed that most of the relatives had moved or lived in the United States. Our client was divorced and the mother of 2 children, one who died at age 20 in Iraq.  Her daughter and grandchildren lived in the United States and were awaiting full citizenship.

The Applicant service to the US. Army was a huge issue in the mitigation of this case. Attorney Edmunds has a formula for these cases and it has been largely successful over the last 10 years. This client was referred to Attorney Edmunds by co-workers in Iraq. She had done her own Response to SOR, and it was not very good or complete.

This case along with many others are reported on the Official Gov’t website at DOHA. Many other lawyers talk about case victories but they can’t be found on the DOHA site. The Edmunds Law Firm also posts case vistories each week for review. The free videos on the site and on YouTube have been well received.

If you need help call Alan Edmunds today 571.527.4925  East Coast or 800.481.2526 West Coast – then let the experts at the Edmunds Law Firm take over your case. Remember, “experience makes the difference.” Whether you are Active Duty Military, DoD Contractor, or Federal Employee – call us and let us do the hard work.

Clearance Granted – Response To SOR
Financial Concerns & Personal Conduct
Ft. Meade, MD
April 2018

One of the best ways to win a security clearance case when the gov’t sends a Notice of revocation is to win by the Written Response to SOR. This saves our clients money and a great deal of stress by avoiding the Formal Security Clearance Appeal. The Edmunds Law Firm wins a lot of cases just from the Written Response to SOR. We do this by filing a legal brief and numerous exhibits that mitigate the govt concerns.

That is what happened in this case. Our client failed to declare and disclose certain delinquent debts tied to a failed business. The business was actually owned by our client’s parents and went thru different types of entities. The company subsequently went thru Bankruptcy and our client believed debts were resolved. Some of the Company debts were in our client’s name with his parents.

The Edmunds Law Firm went to work and filed a very detailed Response to SOR. We argued many factors including our clients service to his country in the military. Attorney Alan Edmunds has over 40 years of security clearance experience and he helps clients around the world. Linguists deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan and the Middle East trust their career’s to Attorney Edmunds when trouble comes knocking. His case victories are officially reported on the govt’ website at DOHA. He is also a former Judge Pro Tem and a subject matter expert on national security clearance matters.

If you have questions or have received a Notice to Revoke your Clearance call Alan Edmunds at 571.527.4925  East Coast or 800.481.2526 West Coast. Nationalsecurityclearances.com is also a great place for info and case reviews.  There is a reason he is often called the DOHA Lawyer, find out why.

Security Clearance Granted
Written Response To SOR
Psychological Conditions
Dept of Defense
Ft. George Meade, MD
March 2018

Attorney Alan Edmunds and his staff at the Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable adjudication following the submission of a Written Response to SOR. Our client received a SOR raising Psychological Conditions. The concerns revolved around “panic attacks” which were concurring at work.

The individual was on medication and the condition was totally under control. Our client was also totally compliant with treatment and was following all recommendations. There was evidence of a hostile work environment.

The Applicant was from a rural community. He also served in the U.S. Navy. In the Navy, he served as an IT Network Administrator Instructor. His evaluations were good. After 10 years he received an Honorable Discharge.

The Written Response to SOR contained numerous documents. The letters of Applicant’s character proved to be very important. The gov’t agreed that the condition was mitigated and the Clearance granted.  This case like many others handled by Attorney Alan Edmunds shows that a contested Security Clearance Hearing can be avoided in certain cases. Mr. Edmunds helps people around the globe with Security Clearance Appeals. He can be reached at 800 481 2526. Trust your career to the experts at The Edmunds Law Firm.

Victory From Written Response
Dept of Defense
Active Duty Army Officer
Sexual Behavior, Personal Conduct
Ft. Meade, MD
April 2018

We love tough cases”. These are the words of Attorney Alan Edmunds who has one of the busiest national security clearance law firms in the country. In fact, many clients come to our law firm because other law firms don’t want to take their case because they think it is too hard! Our attorneys love the courtroom and love to win tough cases. Our track record is reported on the official DOHA website and speaks for itself.

This case was won and our client’s career saved by submission of a Response to SOR. Read the comment from our client:

  “I WAS GRANTED MY SECURITY CLEARANCE WITHOUT A HEARING BUT BASED SOLELY ON THE LEGAL BRIEF THAT YOU PROVIDED ME!”

He went on to say :

   “MY SECURITY MANAGER WAS BLOWN AWAY BY THE LEGAL BRIEF AND TOLD ME I WAS A LITTLE BIT OVERKILL. “I FELT GREAT ABOUT WHAT YOU PUT TOGETHER AND THE RESULTS MATCHED MY FEELINGS.”

Mr. E.E. ( April 10,2018)

If you need help with any phase of the security clearance process from SF 86 to Security Clearance Appeals please call us at 800.481.2526 on the West coast or 571.527.4925 on the East coast.  Your career is important – get the Best Attorney you can – call us.

Security Clearance Hearing Victory
Drug Use & Personal Conduct
Los Angeles, California
Dept of Defense
March 2018

The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of another favorable decision in a National Security Clearance matter from the DoD. The case was heard in Los Angeles and Attorney Ryan Nerney appeared for the Firm. Ryan Nerney appears across the country as the Sr. Litigation Attorney at  The Edmunds Law Firm. His case victories are reported on the official gov’t website at DOHA. He and Attorney Edmunds win more cases for clients than most attorneys and in fact more than most law firms according to the DOHA site.

In this case, our client was cited for drug use from 2003 to 2010. At times he had a clearance when he used. The gov’t also charged him with poor judgment and personal conduct issues. Attorney Nerney admitted numerous exhibits at the Hearing and took testimony. The client was fully prepared for the Hearing and it showed in his presentation. The Edmunds Law Firm makes sure clients are fully prepared for testimony. In part, this accounts for the numerous favorable decisions the Firm receives from the DoD.

The judge found that our client had rehabilitated himself and that there was strong evidence on the issue of the ‘Whole Person Concept”. The client was found not to be a risk to national security and the Clearance was granted.

Attorney Alan Edmunds has been helping clients around the globe for over 40 years. Active Duty Military, Contractors, and Federal Employees trust their careers and jobs to Alan Edmunds when faced with actions involving Security Clearance Denials or Security Clearance Appeals. His number is 571.527.4925. Case reviews appear each week on Nationalsecurityclearances.com as well as new instructional videos.

Attorney Edmunds is often considered as “The Best Security Clearance Lawyer” in the country by many. He is on national media as a Subject Matter Expert in National Security. He is often called “The DOHA Lawyer.

Lebanon & Saudi Arabia
Foreign Influence
Security Clearance Appeal Victory
Chicago, IL
April 2018

The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable decision for our client who had his security clearance revoked pending appeal for Foreign Influence – Guideline B under the DoD Directive.  Attorney Ryan Nerney appeared for the Firm and represented the client at the Formal Security Clearance Appeal.  He introduced 9 exhibits and called the client as a witness.

Our client is a 48-year-old defense contractor who has been employed as a U.S. Linguist since 2006. He has several family members in Lebanon. His mother is 75 years old and he sends her $8000 per year. She is in poor health. He has not been back to Lebanon since 1995. He communicates with his mother every 6 months by phone.  Because of his investments, his net worth in the U.S. is EST AT $710,000.00. One of the strongest character letters came from a Special Agent of the FBI. The judge also acknowledged that the client made important contributions to the U.S. military at great risk.

The Judge found that the foreign Influence concerns were mitigated and the Clearance granted. Call 800 481 2526 if you need help with a security clearance. Visit our websites for case decisions and view the new videos. Attorney Alan Edmunds and Attorney Ryan Nerney are two of the Best Security Clearance Lawyers in the country.  Let us help you!!

Victory Following Hearing
Drug Use and Personal Conduct
Dept of Defense
March 2018

Attorney Alan Edmunds received Notice of a favorable ruling for a client accused of drug use while holding a security clearance and personal conduct – failing to answer his EQIP correctly.

Our client is 35 years old and works as a systems engineer. He used marijuana in high school at the age of 18. He admitted his use. He then went on a vacation with some buddies and rented a condo where one of his friends offered the group a “joint” to smoke. Our client smoked the marijuana “joint” with the others. At the time he had a security clearance.

Attorney Alan Edmunds, this country’s leading attorney in national security clearance matters took the case to a Hearing. At the Hearing, he introduced 13 documents in mitigation and took testimony from 3 witnesses.  He also called his client to testify on “direct examination”. Attorney Edmunds has over 40 years of litigation experience in criminal proceedings, Courts-Martial, and Federal Administrative Law Hearings before most of the DoD Agencies as well as DOE and Dept. of State. His practice spans the globe helping Active Duty Military with security clearance issues. If you would like to speak with Alan Edmunds call 571.527.4925 or visit our websites at nationalsecurityclearances.com   Mr. Edmunds has also posted new videos for your review.

The law firm will do Responses to SOR, Security Clearance Appeals, Security Clearance Denials, and consultations. Your career is important  – remember “experience makes the difference.” All of Attorney Edmunds victories are reported on the official DOHA website.

Afghanistan
Victory From Written Response To SOR
Dept Of Defense
Foreign Influence & Personal Conduct
March 2018

The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable adjudication following submission of a written Response to SOR.  The case involved a woman who with her family fled Pakistan, obtained foreign passports for her children from Afghanistan and eventually came to the United States.

Our client sent money to her parents in Afghanistan every two months for their care. On the SF 86 our client did not fully reveal her contacts with family and money sent to them in Afghanistan.

The staff at the Edmunds Law Firm filed a Response to SOR that was over 30 pages with exhibits. The Firm argued mitigation and explained the danger facing our client as she fled across the Middle East.

The government agreed with the Response submitted and found that the concerns were mitigated. Another family saved and another job saved as well. Attorney Alan Edmunds has a staff of professionals that is amazing. WE are dedicated to our clients. Attorney Edmunds has offices coast to coast and helps Active Duty Military, Linguists, DoD Contractors and Federal Employees. He does Security Clearance Hearings and prepares Security Clearance Appeals at all levels with all Federal Agencies. He has appeared on national TV as a subject matter expert in security clearance matters and welcomes your calls. Please reach him at 571 527 4925 or  800 481 2526. Visit our website nationalsecurityclearances.com and review cases and our new videos.

Security Clearance Victory Following Hearing
Foreign Influence, Taiwan
Phoenix, Arizona
April, 2018

The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a Favorable Decision from DoD following a Security Clearance Hearing. The case was held in Phoenix Arizona and Attorney Ryan Nerney appeared for the Firm.

The case was a typical Guideline F: Foreign Influence case. Our client had in-laws from Taiwan. His wife was also a citizen of Taiwan. Our client is a U.S. citizen who had earned several college degrees from U.S. universities. He had numerous financial interests in the U. S. showing strong ties to the United States.

Attorney Nerney argued the steady economic growth the United States has with Taiwan. He had done tremendous research into the current relationship between Taiwan and the United States. He also introduced exhibits into evidence. Attorney Nerney also took testimony at the Hearing.

The judge agreed with Mr. Nerney and the Clearance was granted. The Edmunds Law Firm specializes in Foreign Influence cases as well as financial concern cases. Attorney Alan Edmunds represents Linguists around the globe.  Our victories are reported on the official gov’t website at DOHA. Call us at 800 481 2526 for help. Visit nationalsecurityclearances.com  and watch our videos posted on YouTube.

Security Clearance Granted – Written Response
Dept of Defense
Foreign Influence; Personal Conduct; Psychological Conditions
March 2018
Ft. Meade, MD

The Edmunds Law Firm – did it again- saved a client’s job and his career with a written response to SOR. It is a hard thing to do and often not successful. Often a Formal Security Clearance Hearing is needed. This case was done by staff at the Firm – and reviewed and signed off by Attorney Nerney.

The case was complex but made easy by the tremendous effort of our client who took personal steps to mitigate past behavior. He is active duty and continues on in his profession. Attorney Nerney submitted numerous exhibits and a legal brief.

The case was reviewed by the CAF and the recommendation was favorable for our client. Attorney Alan Edmunds started his law firm over 40 yrs ago. Today he and his staff help people around the globe with national security clearance matters. He does Response to SOR, Security Clearance Hearings and Security clearance Consults. Call us at 571 527 4925 for solutions!! Visit nationalsecurityclearances.com and view the security clearance videos.

Security Clearance Victory Following Hearing
Failure to Pay Debts
Dept Of Defense
New York City, NY
March 2018

Attorney Edmunds traveled to New York City to help our client keep his job and his Security Clearance. The case was hard fought. Attorney Edmunds would have it no other way – he loves the courtroom. The case involved our client, age 38, who performed aircraft maintenance and weapons loading. He is married with four children and has had a Clearance for over 17 yrs.

The problems started when his wife lost her job on 3 separate occasions. The bills started mounting and our client had about $38,000 in debt. Attorney Alan Edmunds, this country’s leading attorney for National Security Clearance cases, had both the client and his wife attend credit counseling. The client was told to do several other things which all went to mitigation of the gov’t concerns.  Attorney Edmunds has over 40 years of litigation experience and is known around the world as a caring and passionate attorney. He introduced exhibits A thru BB into evidence.

The judge agreed with Attorney Edmunds who argued the “whole person” concept that the circumstances would unlikely be repeated and that the client was on a budget and doing very well financially. The judge found it was in everyone best interest to grant the Clearance. Another job saved and another American family kept solvent.

Attorney Edmunds, known as ” The DOHA LAWYER”, can help you if your Clearance is at risk. Just call us at 571.527.4925 and speak with Mr. Edmunds. Visit nationalsecurityclearances.com for additional info. Whether Active Duty, Contractor or Federal Employee – The Edmunds Law Firm is here for you.  If you need a consult, Response to SOR, Security Clearance Appeal – please call us.

Favorable Decision Following Trial
Prescription Drug Abuse
Westchester, Ohio
March 2018
Guideline E: Personal Conduct
Guideline H: Drug Involvement
Guideline J: Criminal Conduct

This was a tremendous result for our client and Attorney Ryan Nerney who appeared in Ohio for the Firm. The case involved drug use – specifically using a spouse’s pain medication. Our client used his wife’s pain medication and admitted his use to the gov’t. On his SF 86 he admitted the use but failed to accurately state the extent of his use. He also used recreational drugs on a few occasions.

Attorney Ryan Nerney entered numerous documents into evidence. The mitigation was strong. He also took testimony from the client and witnesses.

The gov’t case centered around Executive Order 12564 which explicitly states that Federal employees are required to refrain from the illegal use of drugs both on or off duty.  Our client had used Vicodin while employed by the Federal Gov’t.

The Edmunds Law Firm helps clients across the United States with all types of Security Clearance matters. Response to SOR, Appeal Hearings and Investigation issues are all common cases for our Firm. Both Attorney Alan Edmunds and Attorney Ryan Nerney have official case postings on the Gov’t site at DOHA. This site reports cases and shows just how many cases an attorney has handled in the last several years before DOHA Judges. People are encouraged to visit our websites for current case reviews and to view our new videos on important Security Clearance Questions. Call 571 527 4925 or 800 481 2526 for guidance and answers to important questions you may have.

Favorable Decision From Written Response
Dept of Defense
March 14, 2018
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Guideline E: Personal Conduct
Guideline M: Use of Information Technology

This is an unusual case because of the nature of the allegations. It is also an example of misuse of terms and words describing how an individual leaves a place of employment. The Edmunds Law Firm, with over 40 yrs of experience in Security Clearance cases before all gov’t agencies, was ready for this one!!

Our client first downloaded a video game to a classified stand-alone computer that was not in use. Our client told his manager about the video game and removed it shortly after installation. He admitted his mistake and acknowledged this was a one-time incident – which in fact was true.

His next mistake involved his description of how he left previous employment.  This situation often arises because often people do not know how the employer enters a description of an employees departure from a job. Our client indicated he left by mutual agreement and the employer indicated it was a termination. Our client had never left employment before this incident and he told investigators there was no intent to mislead.

The staff at the Edmunds Law Firm drafted a Response to SOR that included evidence supporting a “whole person concept”. Other mitigation was also provided. The gov’t accepted our argument on mitigation and the Clearance was reinstated. Another job saved!  Call us at 800.481.2526 on the West coast or 571.527.4925 on the East coast for help. We represent civilian DoD contractors and Active Duty Military deployed around the globe.

Favorable Decision From Written Response
March 15, 2018
Department of Defense
Exeter, Rhode Island
Guideline I: Psychological Conditions

The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision on a Response to SOR for a client who had a  diagnosis of major depression and anxiety disorder.  Our client was in Guam when he experienced a major personal loss. He was placed on a strong medicine that had serious side effects. A new doctor and new medicine turned client health around and he continued to perform very well.

The issue that complicated this case was a diagnosis from a gov’t doctor who had seen our client only one occasion. His report had numerous errors. Attorney Edmunds and his staff used independent medical counsel and strong mitigation to overcome the concerns of the gov’t. The case was indeed reversed and our client received his Clearance.

Attorney Alan Edmunds has offices across the United States. He works with Active Duty Military from every branch of the service as well as Federal Employees and DoD Contractors. He appears at Hearings and does Security Clearance Appeals. His staff is trained in Response to SOR – and they perform very well as they did in this case.

Mr. Edmunds appears in the media as a “Subject Matter Expert” for national security clearance matters. He has been an trial lawyer for over 40 years. Call 800.481.2526 with questions or to schedule an appointment. Known as one of “The Best Security Clearance Lawyers” in the country – Attorney Edmunds skill and experience is available to clients who are facing a loss of job or career.

Favorable Decision Following Hearing
Washington DC
Dept Of Energy
February 27
Guidelines  H: Drug Use & Guideline E: Personal Conduct

The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision from the Dept of Energy following Hearing. The case was presented by Attorney Ryan Nerney for the Firm. Attorney Nerney appears before DOE ( Dept of Energy) on many occasions for our clients. In this case, as in many others, he saved our client job and won this case.

Te gov’t alleged that our client violated the DOE facility drug-free workplace policy. Our client had used marijuana on a few occasions. He had never used on the job. Nor did any of the witnesses testify that they saw him under the influence of any drugs. His work performance was excellent. The judge agreed with Attorney Nerney and the Clearance was granted.

The Firm represents clients before many DoD Agencies including DOE, FBI, CIA, NSA, NGA, NRO, DOHA, and ICE just to name a few. We are experts in this area. Attorney Edmunds is a “subject matter expert” and has been featured in several media interviews for national security clearance matters. He has over 40 years experience.and has appeared on national television. Call our attorneys at 800.481.2526 – West Coast or 571 527 4945 – East Coast for immediate help. You may also watch our video library for free on nationalsecurityclearances.com

Egypt & Iraq
Favorable Decision Following Hearing
Woodland Hills, Calif
February 2018
Guideline B: Foreign Influence
Guideline C: Foreign Preference

The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision following a security clearance hearing held in the Los Angels area of Calif. The case was presented by Attorney Ryan Nerney for the Firm. Mr. Nerney is an attorney who is well known in the Security Clearance field. He travels across the country for his clients and has won many cases.

The client came to the US in 1987 and became a US citizen in 1992. He obtained an Egyptian National Identity Card for the sole purpose of obtaining a copy of his college degrees from Egypt. He testified that he has surrendered the Card to his AFSO and the Card was destroyed.  The applicant also admitted he voted in an Egyptian election one time. Applicant’s wife was born in Iraq and is a US citizen

At the Hearing, Attorney Nerney took testimony and admitted 18 exhibits. He argued mitigation factors and supported his arguments with evidence.

The judge found that “it is consistent with the national interest to grant Applicant national security eligibility,”.  The Clearance was granted, the Applicant continues to work in his profession and his career continues. We are pleased to “save another career” for our clients. But this is something that Attorney Edmunds and Attorney Nerney do on a regular basis for clients around the globe. Both Active Duty and DoD Contractors call the experts at the Edmunds Law Firm for help.  Call us at 800 481 2526 (West coast) or 571 527 4925 (East coast). Remember experience makes the difference. Many lawyers say they do security clearance work but have very few victories to show!!

Favorable Decision Following Hearing
February 2018
Guideline F : Financial Concerns
Woodland Hills, California

The Edmunds Law Firm received another favorable ruling following a contested Hearing on a National Security Clearance matter heard in Woodland Hills, Calif. The case was presented by Attorney Ryan Nerney for the Firm. Mr. Nerney is a well known and respected trial attorney in the area of national security clearance legal circles.  The Edmund Law Firm offers excellent service to clients with Response to SOR, Security Clearance Appeals, Security Clearance Hearings.

In this case, the client had delinquent debts totaling $142,000. The Applicant is 44 years old and held a job as a defense contractor. He has been divorced twice and has 2 children. The root cause of his financial troubles were the 2 divorces. The Applicant has a Ph.D. and is also a Lt. Commander in the Navy Reserves. Attorney Nerney argued the “whole person” concept and of course spoke of the client service to his country.

The Edmunds Law Firm has offices across the US and travels for clients to all States in an effort to save jobs and careers for our clients. We are very successful! This case was officially reported on the DOHA website and on our Firm’s websites for reviews. We know of no other law Firm that does as many cases on a national basis at DOHA as the Edmunds Law Firm. This is important for clients. “Experience makes the difference” in these types of cases. We offer discounts for our men and woman in uniform. Active Duty Welcome!!

If you have questions about your Federal job (MSPB), Security Clearance issues, call us today – West Coast 800.481.2526 or East Coast – 571.527.4925. We are here to serve.

Pakistan
Favorable Decision Security Clearance
Department of Defense
February 2018
Guideline B: Foreign Influence

Attorney Alan Edmunds, this country’s leading Security Clearance Attorney, received another favorable decision from a Hearing for a client with roots to Pakistan. The case was an incredible contest because of the country involved and the number of relatives the client had and contacts with such Arab countries as United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia.

Attorney Edmunds has over 40 years of security clearance experience and it was needed in this case. He introduced over 30 exhibits and took testimony. The govt had one of its most experienced attorneys in the courtroom.

The client is age 30, married with one child born in the US and works as a defense contractor. The client had not traveled to Pakistan for over 6 years. He cut ties with his relatives and Pakistan to form a new life in the US. He has purchased 2 homes in the US and earns $114 K per year.

The Edmunds Law Firm helps clients around the globe. Mr. Edmunds is a favored attorney for Linguists and computer Science professional from India, Pakistan, and the Middle East. His client base is huge. This case is reported on the official DOHA web site. Mr. Edmunds is one of the most experienced lawyers in the country doing National Security Clearance work. Call him at 800.481.26526 for immediate guidance. He can help with Response to SOR, Security Clearance Appeals, and Security Clearance Hearings across the US. You can also view his videos on keepyoursecurityclearance.com or nationalsecurityclearances.com . His offices are in Washington DC/Arlington VA; North Carolina; Florida and Calif. East coast clients call 571.527.4910 and West coast clients call 800.481.2526.

Known as ” The DOHA LAWYER” – Alan Edmunds helps Active Duty Military, DoD Contractors and Federal Employees with both Security Clearance matters and MSPB cases. In this case, the judge found,” it is clearly consistent with the national interest to grant him eligibility for access to classified information.”

Security Clearance Hearing Favorable Decision
Guideline F: Financial Concerns
Dept Of Defense
Arlington, VA
February 2018

Attorney Alan Edmunds received Notice of a favorable court ruling he received following a Formal Security Clearance Appeal Hearing. The case involved allegations of financial concern including bankruptcy and several debts. This was, unfortunately, the “perfect storm” for this 49-year-old engineer who suffered periods of unemployment, divorce and an incredibly harsh divorce support order. Attorney Edmunds, this country’s leading security clearance lawyer, presented testimony, introduced numerous documents and called witnesses to show strong mitigation.

The judge found that the Applicant experienced circumstances beyond his control. He also accepted evidence that the debts were brought current or under an agreement to repay.

The judge was also advised of the Applicants military service and the fact that he held a security clearance for over 30 years. Given the evidence that Attorney Edmunds introduced and the “good character” of the Applicant the judge ruled, ” The applicant has made considerable progress on his delinquent debts ….and has mitigated financial considerations.”  The clearance was granted.

The Edmunds Law Firm has offices coast to coast to serve clients. Need a Response to SOR or help with a Security Clearance Hearing – just call.

Winning is Mr. Edmunds primary goal. He loves to save jobs and careers for his clients. He does this around the globe for deployed Active Duty, Linguists, and DoD contractors. He can help you as well. Call 800.481.2526 on the west coast or 571.527.4925 on the East coast. Visit nationalsecurityclearances.com

Austin, Texas
Guidelines J, E, H
Department of Defense
Favorable Decision Following Hearing
March 5, 2018

The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision following a Personal Appearance that was done by Attorney Ryan Nerney. Attorney Nerney is well known in the Intelligence  Community for his legal skills at DoD Hearings on the West Coast. In this case, he fought hard for his client.

This was a tough case because of the numerous allegations involving drug use, criminal behavior and intentionally falsification of an SF 86.

Attorney Nerney took testimony, introduced numerous exhibits and presented argument to the Administrative Judge.

The client wrote Attorney Nerney upon receiving the results and said;

“Just got told my clearance is granted. I am TS SCI. Thank you all for your help!  Very glad to begin working.”

The Edmunds Law Firm is about the business of saving jobs and careers. We have over 45 years of experience and are probably the most active law firms across the United States. On the DOHA website – an official gov’t site that reports Hearings – our law Firm is presented as a very experienced law firm with cases coast to coast. The Firm has offices in Washington/Arlington area as well as Calif, Florida and North Carolina.

If you need a Response to SOR, representation at a Security Clearance Appeal Hearing or simply have questions please call 800 481 2526. Visit us at nationalsecurityclearances.com

Russia
Security Clearance Favorable Decision
Guideline B: Foreign Influence
Feb 23, 2018
Arlington, VA

Attorney Alan Edmunds received Notice from the Dept. of Defense of a favorable decision following a contested Security Clearance Appeal Hearing. The case was interesting because the client is a 48 yr old DoD contractor who immigrated to the United States under “refugee status”. He is married and has 3 children. He was born in Ukraine.

The Applicant successfully passed a counter-intelligence polygraph in 2005. Applicant’s parents, sister and her family are all US citizens. The allegations included a cousin of the Applicant who is a citizen of Russia. There were also allegations of past financial interests which no longer exist.

Attorney Alan Edmunds represents numerous foreign-born Applicants who are now working and are citizens of the U.S. He has a global reputation helping individuals who have brilliant careers in the U.S. that have past ties with other countries. Many former clients from Iraq, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan just to name a few countries have publicly recommended Alan Edmunds as one of “The Best Security Clearance Attorneys” in the United States.

This case has been reported on the official gov’t website at DOHA. The judge found that this client, “He is an American Success story”. The clearance was granted. Call Alan at 800.481.2526 for help. The Firm does Response to SOR, Security Clearance Hearings from offices coast to coast. As Mr. Edmunds frequently states, “Experience Makes the Difference.”

Bosnia/Herzegovina
Guideline B: Foreign Influence
DoD Defense Contractor
Feb 23, 2018
Written Response Favorable Decision

The Edmunds Law Firm, a worldwide provider of legal services in the area of National Security Clearance matters received notice of a favorable decision following a written Response to SOR. The case involved our client who is a refugee from Bosnia. He is married and has 2 sons.  He immigrated to the US in 1999 after living in Germany following the civil war in Bosnia.

Our client is 33 years old and lives in Chicago. He is a GS 12 and works for DoD as an Auditor. Attorney Alan Edmunds filed a written Response to SOR that included numerous exhibits and a legal brief arguing mitigation.

Attorney Edmunds has been helping both Active Duty Military and civilian Contractors around the globe with Security Clearance Appeals for over 39 years. He is a “subject matter expert” for national and local media. He has published 2 books on National Security Clearance issues. He has established himself as one of the Best Security Clearance Attorneys in the United States. His clients span the globe.

The Edmunds Law Firm has offices coast to coast in Arlington/ Washington DC, Jacksonville Florida, San Diego, California and Raleigh, North Carolina.  On the East coast, he can be reached at 571.527.4925 and the West coast at 800.481.2526. Case reviews appear at nationalsecurityclearances.com  – please call today and speak with Attorney Edmunds for solutions to security clearance problems.

Favorable Decision From Written Response
Ashburn, VA
Personal Conduct: Guideline E
Substance Abuse: Guideline H
February 21, 2018

This is an unusual case because it involved several allegations but one was the use of Testosterone for treatment of low Testosterone levels. A prescription was used for several years but ran out while the Applicant was out of the country. He purchased the drug while in the U.S. Army.

The case was submitted by the Edmunds Law Firm with numerous exhibits including awards and decorations. The Applicant’s personal references were very strong.

The Clearance was granted without a Formal Security Clearance Hearing based entirely on the written Response. Alan Edmunds helps Active Duty Military deployed around the globe with security clearance matters. He appears coast to coast in Security Clearance Hearings.

If you have questions or need a Response to SOR – call Attorney Edmunds at 800.481.2526 or visit the Firm website at nationalsecurityclearances.com.

Favorable Decision Following Hearing
Department of Defense
Guideline F: Financial Concerns
Arlington, VA
February 13, 2018

The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of another favorable decision following a formal Security Clearance Hearing that was held in Arlington VA. Attorney Alan Edmunds appeared for the Firm. The applicant is 58 yrs. old, divorced and no children. She has a Bachelor’s and a Master’s degree. She is a training specialist in Management Systems Programs. She is a contractor.

The Applicant had filed 4 Bankruptcies thru a representative while deployed. She also had a tax lien in various amounts and a mortgage foreclosure in the amount of $247,000.

At the Hearing, Attorney Edmunds stated that she was unaware of the Bankruptcy filings thru her representative who had power of attorney. She testified she was only aware of one Bankruptcy filing. The others were filled when she was deployed out of the country. The Applicant had a payment agreement with the IRS and proof of this was admitted into evidence.

The Judge agreed with Attorney Edmunds that the record does not raise doubts about Applicants trustworthiness and good judgment. The evidence introduced by Attorney Edmunds was undisputed. The Clearance was granted.

Attorney Edmunds is very experienced in national security clearance law. He is considered throughout the United States as “The Best Security Clearance Lawyer“. He is also known as “The DOHA LAWYER”.

If you need help with a Clearance or a Response to SOR – just call 800.481.2526 to speak with the experts at The Edmunds Law Firm.

Active Duty Military Security Clearance
February 2, 2018
Philadelphia, PA
Guideline E: Personal Conduct
Guideline J: Criminal Conduct
Department of Defense

The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice that our client, an Active Duty Military member who is in the Reserves, was granted his security clearance after the CAF had received and reviewed the formal Response to SOR. Attorney Eric Cowdery for the Firm wrote the Response to SOR and submitted exhibits and a legal brief in support of the Applicant.

The allegations included BAH fraud, criminal conduct and financial concerns (Guideline F). Attorney Cowdery argued strong mitigation. The case took over 12 years in the adjudication stage!  Also, many of the allegations involved his girlfriend. The client was in the Navy at the time of the allegations and his girlfriend had control over bills and money. He is currently age 52 and has served his country for over 15 years.

This case was “sweet” because the client was granted his Clearance without having to attend a Formal Security Clearance Hearing. He saved time and money and he won!

The Edmunds Law Firm helps Active Duty Military deployed around the globe. Security Clearance AppealsResponse to SOR, and Response to Interrogatories as well as consults are all available. Call us today at 800 481 2526 or visit nationalsecurityclearances.com

Boise, Idaho
January 29, 2018
Clearance Granted From Written Response
Guideline F: Financial Concerns

Attorney Alan Edmunds received Notice just days prior to the Security Clearance Appeal Hearing that the SOR against his client had been withdrawn based on new evidence the Edmunds sent the gov’t Attorney. The Hearing was taken off the calendar and the Applicant was granted his Clearance. In the same week, 3 other cases that were all represented by attorneys with The Edmunds Law Firm were withdrawn.

The case was interesting because it involved allegations of indebtedness including 10 separate debts that the Applicant had incurred. The case turned on the strong mitigation presented in documents by Attorney Edmunds. The evidence included periods of unemployment, business failure, and invalid debts.

Attorney Edmunds is the leading attorney in the area of national security clearance appeals. If your job is at risk or you need a strong Response to SOR or a Security Clearance Appeal, call the attorney that wins across the United States, Alan Edmunds. Mr. Edmunds is a former Judge Pro Tem and is a subject matter expert in national security matters. He helps Active Duty Military, DoD Contractors and federal Employees with Security Clearance matters. His Law Firm has offices across the United States. He also is a favorite attorney for many Linguists deployed around the world. Call him 800.481.2526 – “Experience makes the difference.”  The attorney is known as “ The DOHA Lawyer.”   Favorable decisions are posted each week for review.

January 30, 2018
Written Response Favorable Decision
Arlington, VA
Guideline F: Financial Concerns
Department of Defense

The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice from the attorney for Dept. of Defense that a case set for a Formal Security Clearance Appeal Hearing was being dismissed and that the SOR was being withdrawn.

Attorney Alan Edmunds, this country’s leading security clearance attorney was handling the case for the Applicant. The case involved a man who was 50 years of age and worked as a Contractor. He had numerous debts including student loans. Attorney Edmunds introduced evidence of severe hardship. Included in the Response to SOR were exhibits A thru G. The Response was a Formal Response to SOR that was over 25 pages.

Attorney Edmunds is well known in the country as “One of the Best Security Clearance Lawyers“. He is a subject matter expert in national security matters for media, newspapers, and television.

If you have a security clearance question, or need to Respond to a SOR, or are going to a Security Clearance Hearing anywhere in the United States please call our Firm at 800.481.2526. You may also visit us at nationalsecurityclearances.comAttorney Edmunds helps Active Duty Military deployed around the globe as well as Contractors, Linguists, and Federal Employees. We have offices in Washington D.C., Jacksonville Florida, San Diego, California and Raleigh, North Carolina.

1st Lt Air National Guard
Victory Following Hearing
January 19, 2018
Arlington, VA
Department of Defense
Guideline H: Drug Involvement

Attorney Alan Edmunds saved another career in the courtroom for an outstanding 1st Lt who made some mistakes 5 years ago when he used drugs. The whole case that Attorney Edmunds presented surrounded the “whole person” concept but also an interesting influence in the life of his client.

The 1st Lt had a fiancé that was a “druggie” and very toxic. She was a terrible influence but the relationship had some chemistry for short periods of time. While Attorney Edmunds did a great job in court – really the 1st Lt. did a much greater job turning his life around after he ended the relationship with this woman. Once the woman was out of his life, things began to change for the better.

Alan Edmunds introduced exhibits A – Q into evidence. He also called a witness that had known the Applicant for several years and knew about the “fiancé”. The witness corroborated the wild life style of the fiancé. The Judge announced his intention for a favorable ruling while the Applicant was still in the courtroom. Another career saved!

Mr. Edmunds took the case after other lawyers told the Applicant he had little chance for success. The Edmunds Law Firm helps Active Duty Security Clearance clients and Civilian clients with Security Clearance Appeals. With offices across the United States, the Firm has a national reputation for excellence.  Several people know attorney Edmunds as “The Best Security Clearance Attorney” in the country. He is also known as THE DOHA ATTORNEY because of the hundreds of cases he has done.

If you need a Response to SOR or an attorney for a Security Clearance Hearing – call Alan Edmunds at 800.481.2526 or visit nationalsecurityclearances.com

South Korea
January 8, 2018
Lansing Michigan
Guideline B: Foreign Influence
Department Of Defense
Favorable Decision Following Hearing

Attorney Alan Edmunds received Notice of a Favorable Court Decision following a Hearing involving foreign contacts. The Applicant has a wife who resides now in the United States but formerly in South Korea. Extended family also live in South Korea. The Applicant had no property or bank accounts in South Korea.

Applicant has two children living in the United States ages 13 and 1. Applicant is a retired Army Colonel. He loyally served in the military and offered numerous awards and decorations into evidence.  The evidence included instances when the Applicant put his life in danger while deployed in Afghanistan.

The judge agreed with Attorney Edmunds who argued that the gov’t concerns were mitigated and outweighed by proof of loyalty to the United States. His clearance was recommended. Call Alan Edmunds at 800.481.2526 with questions. Visit nationalsecruityclearances.com for more information.   Mr. Edmunds specializes in Security Clearance Hearings across the United States. The Firm has offices in Arlington, VA; Raleigh, NC; Jacksonville, Florida and San Diego, California.

January 17, 2018
Washington D.C.
Response to DoD Interrogatories
Guideline E: Personal Conduct

The Edmunds Law Firm responded to Interrogatories propounded and served on our client from the DoD. The facts are very unusual. The applicant’s previous employer had accused our client of corporate espionage. Our client had been laid off from her job and moved on to a new job with another company.

The former employer found out about Applicant’s new job and submitted allegations to JPAS that were proven to be untrue. My staff filed an incredible document outlining “a timeline” and showing the fabrication.

Our client file was corrected and she was allowed to continue her career.  We went the “extra mile” and aggressively documented the mistakes.  This type of case unfortunately happens too often.

The Edmunds Law Firm is this country-leading provider for National Security Clearance representation. We have offices coast to coast and help Active Duty Military, Civilian Contractors and Federal Employees with all matters pertaining to security clearance actions.

Attorney Edmunds has been featured on national television for his casework on National Security Clearance cases. He was also recently a “subject matter expert” in a national magazine. The Firm helps clients with Responses to SORSecurity Clearance AppealsSecurity Clearance Hearings and consultations.

You can review the Firm’s casework and results on our websites or the Federal Government website at DOHA. Simply type in the name, Alan Edmunds or Alan V. Edmunds to review cases. For immediate help call 800.481.2526 on the West Coast or 571.527.4925 on the East coast.

Alan V. Edmunds
Arlington, VA Security Clearance Attorney
Favorable Security Clearance Decision
Guideline F: Financial Concerns
January 10, 2018

Attorney Alan Edmunds received another favorable decision from the DoD following the submission of a Written Response to SOR. The client is married with one young child. Attorney Edmunds introduced evidence with the Response to SOR that showed her husband was laid off from his job and that her minor child had serious medical problems.

Attorney Edmunds had the client attend credit counseling. She also filed Bankruptcy. Her work evaluations were introduced and she offered several other documents with the Response to SOR to mitigate concerns.

The DoD reviewed the answer filed by The Edmunds Law Firm and reviewed the numerous exhibits as well. The end result was that the SOR was withdrawn and the client kept her job.

Alan Edmunds has over 40 years experience with military law and national security clearance law. He travels across the country helping clients fight for their clearance and their jobs.

Attorney Edmunds is a subject matter expert in the area of national security clearances and has recently been featured in Newsweek Magazine and interviewed by several “wire” services for comments on current security clearance issues involving the Trump Family.

Mr. Edmunds has the actual experience and track record that other attorneys envy. He tells clients, “Experience makes the difference”. So many lawyers have web pages talking about their experience that is not consistent with the government websites that track attorney experience like the DOHA Web Site. Call 800 481 2526 or visit nationalsecurityclearances.com.

Alan V. Edmunds
San Diego Security Clearance Attorney
January 7, 2018 – Case Victory
Guideline J: Criminal Conduct
Guideline E: Personal Conduct

Attorney Alan Edmunds with The Edmunds Law Firm – received notification that his client was granted a security clearance following the submission of a Written Response to SOR.  Winning a Clearance without a Formal Hearing is very difficult and unusual. The Written Response to SOR must be very detailed and well documented with mitigating evidence.

In this case, Attorney Edmunds written a 30 page Response with exhibits A – K. The case against our client included allegations of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon on board of an aircraft and other allegations of violating company policy and termination. Our client was deployed to Afghanistan and worked as a contractor. He also worked in the private industry.

The Clearance was granted and our client was allowed to return to work and keep his career. Attorney Edmunds who has helped both civilian and Active Duty Military around the world received a great deal of gratitude from the client, his family and co-workers. Visit the DOHA web site and type in Alan Edmunds and learn more about the many cases he has won across the country. If you need a Response to SOR or must Appeal a Security Clearance – call The Edmunds Law Firm. They have offices coast to coast and offer payment plans when needed. nationalsecurityclearances.com is a great website for more information.

Department of Defense
December 23, 2017
Guideline F: Financial Considerations
Huntsville, Alabama

Applicant submitted a security clearance application in March 2015. His application raised financial concerns under Guideline F: financial considerations because he had several debts. The 8 debts totaled about $27,000 and many were delinquent through no fault of the applicant. His former wife had hidden debts and failed to pay others without Applicant knowledge. Their divorce was very nasty.

Applicant is a 36 year old field service representative with a contractor. He needs his security clearance to do his job. He served honorably in the U.S. Army for 8 years. One reason he chose The Edmunds Law Firm was due to the fact that Attorney Alan Edmunds had helped many of his active duty friends and that Attorney Edmunds had practiced Military Law for over 35 years.

Alan Edmunds called witnesses to testify and introduced exhibits A thru N into evidence. The purpose of the exhibits showed the “good character” of the Applicant and also mitigated the debts as delinquent because of the ex wife’s failure to pay bills on time.  Attorney Edmunds totally prepared the Applicant for his testimony and also showed him important steps to take before the Formal Security Clearance Hearing that would help in mitigating the government concerns.

The judge agreed with Attorney Edmunds and found that the applicant was trustworthy and eligibility to access to classified information was granted. The applicant kept his job and his paycheck to the relief of his family. Attorney Edmunds received the satisfaction of helping another member of the military.  Mr. Edmunds has clients around the globe deployed in very dangerous places. He represents some of the most heroic members of the military for special fees. The Edmunds Law Firm is indeed the Law Firm that many Active Duty Members turn to for help. He does Responses to SORSecurity Clearance Appeals, and offers step-by-step guidance with the SF 86 preparation. Call 800.481.2526 or visit nationalsecurityclearances.com for immediate help. Your career is too important not to retain the Best Security Clearance Lawyer in the country, known as the DOHA LAWYER. Call Alan today, your family deserves the best.

Department of Defense
Guideline B: Foreign Influence, Egypt
New Haven, Connecticut
December 20, 2017

Attorney Alan Edmunds received Notice of a favorable decision following a contested Hearing on a national security clearance matter that was held in Connecticut. Our client is a native of Egypt who acquired his U.S. citizenship in 1987. He is a senior systems engineer for a defense contractor. He has had a security clearance since 1987 as an employee for a defense contractor. Applicant had an Egyptian passport, which he surrendered in 2009. It was used to travel to Egypt at a time he was getting married to an Egyptian woman.

Applicant had 2 distant uncles and 1 aunt in Egypt. His contact with any relatives in Egypt stopped in 2004. The evidence showed there was no foreign travel to Egypt within the last 7 years.

The major issue involved a $100 to $200 contribution that the Applicant made on occasion to a religious affiliated relief fund. The evidence showed that those donations stopped in 2013. The organization was based in the United States but helped out poor Muslims in Egypt.  The Applicant testified that he would never make such donations in the future.

Attorney Edmunds also took testimony from the Applicant’s employer. The President of the company and the CEO testified to the Applicant’s trustworthiness and honesty. Attorney Edmunds also introduced exhibits A-N into evidence that served to show strong mitigation.

Attorney Edmunds used the “whole person concept” in his argument to the court. Alan Edmunds traveled to Connecticut for this Hearing. The Applicant wanted Attorney Edmunds as his security clearance lawyer because he had tried over 600 cases in just the last 4 years across the United States. The applicant said he wanted the experience and expertise of Attorney Edmunds. Many clients call specifically for Attorney Alan Edmunds to represent them in Security Clearance Hearings. The official gov’t web site at DOHA tells the story and why so many people ask for Alan Edmunds personally. Their careers are important and they simply want the best.

The Edmunds Law Firm has a global reputation for aggressive representations. Our attorneys travel the country helping clients with “Responses to SOR”,  “Security Clearance Appeals“, SF 86 prep and DOHA Hearings.

There are lawyers who say they have a great deal of experience – but it’s not shown when you check the DOHA website.  Another problem exists when clients can’t find attorney’s alleged favorable decisions on the official DOHA site.

Call the team of experts at The Edmunds Law Firm – 800.481.2526 or visit us at nationalsecurityclearfances.com

Security Clearance Appeal
Guideline B: Foreign Influence, Iraq
Guideline E: Personal Conduct
Norfolk, VA
December 16, 2017

Attorney Alan Edmunds received Notice of a favorable decision following a Formal Security Clearance Hearing that was held in Norfolk VA. This was a Security Clearance Appeal following a Response to SOR. The case was contested and Attorney Edmunds took testimony and introduced numerous exhibits.

Our client was 38 years old, married with 2 children and extensive family members in Iraq and the Middle East. He is a linguist for the U.S. Army and needed his Security Clearance for his job.

The allegations included several assertions that our client falsified answers on his SF 86 by failing to mention certain relatives in Iraq and some financial gifts to relatives.

Attorney Edmunds who has tried more than 600 Security Clearance Appeals argued several mitigating factors and the “whole person concept”. The judge agreed with the arguments presented by Alan Edmunds and granted the Clearance. Our client left for a U.S. Army base immediately. Career saved, and job continues.

Call us for a free case review. You can reach Attorney Edmunds at 800.481.2526. He has offices in Washington/Arlington and San Diego, California as well as Jacksonville, Florida and Raleigh North Carolina. Many people refer to him as “The Best Security Clearance Attorney” in the U.S.  He was recently featured in a Newsweek Magazine article pertaining to national security clearance applications. He often appears as a “subject matter expert” for the media. Your career is important. Let us help.

Department of Defense
Security Clearance Granted After Written Response
December 19, 2017
Guideline K: Handling Protected Information

One of the best outcomes a client can receive is a favorable decision through a written response.  The Edmunds Law Firm has done just that with a recent victory through a written response to the SOR.

In this specific case, it was alleged that our client disclosed classified information to a non-cleared individual.  Using exhibits and a written legal brief with excellent arguments, we were able to adequately show strong mitigation.  Attorney Ryan C. Nerney wrote the response to SOR and was able to provide superior arguments of mitigation to reduce the government’s concerns.  As a result, the government’s concerns were mitigated, and our client was able to continue with his career working for the Department of Defense with a valid security clearance.

The Edmunds Law Firm is a national leader in Security Clearance Appeals and Response to SOR for both Civilian Federal Employees, Employees of Federal Contractors, and Active Duty Military deployed around the world.  If you have received an SOR/LOI or want to Appeal an adverse security clearance decision please call 800.481.2526 for immediate help.

Department Of Defense
Guideline C: Foreign Preference, Romania
Guideline B: Foreign Influence, Romania
December 13, 2017
Huntsville, Alabama

Attorney Alan Edmunds of The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision on a case heard in Huntsville, Alabama in November. The decision is posted on both the Law Firm websites and the official government site at DOHA for review.

The case involved our client who is a 46 years old born in Romania. His wife is from Romania as well and they have 2 children born in the United States. The applicant has a Ph.D. as well as his wife. The Applicant owns a home in the United States. His relatives including brother, mother-in-law, brother-in-law as well as his mother and father all live in Romania. The Applicant has little or no contact with relatives since 2011.

Attorney Edmunds introduced exhibits A thru H, without objection. Edmunds also called witnesses to testify. The Chief Executive Officer where the Applicant works testified how the work done by the applicant is critical and saves lives of our military members.

Attorney Edmunds travels across the United States helping both civilian contractor clients and military clients with national security clearance problems. He has conducted over 600 Hearings just in the last 4 years. He does Response to SORSecurity Clearance Appeals and SF-86 Prep, for clients around the globe.

In this case the judge found that it was consistent with national security to grant the Applicant’s eligibility for a security clearance. The Applicant kept his job and career. If you need help please call 800.481.2526 and speak to one of the most successful security clearance attorneys in the country, Attorney Alan Edmunds, also known as The DOHA LAWYER.  

US Customs & Border Protection
November 6, 2017
Guideline J:  Criminal Conduct
Guideline H: Drug Involvement
Big Pine Key, Florida

The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision involving allegations of Personal conduct, Drug Involvement, Criminal Conduct following a Written Response to SOR – drafted by the experts at The Edmunds Law Firm.

Our client is 57 years old and served 4 years in the US Coast Guard. His training and employment was that of an Electronics Technician. His case included allegations of wrongful drug use. In the Response to SOR several documents were submitted that showed strong mitigation of the allegations. The decision took over 5 months before being rendered in favor of our client.

Attorney Alan Edmunds helps Active Duty Military as well as Civilian Contractors. Our clients are deployed around the globe but still receive outstanding service from Mr. Edmunds staff. WE have over 40 years of helping clients fight for their jobs and careers in the area of security clearance matters.

Please call us at 800.481.2526 on the West coast or 571.527.4925 on the East coast. Our web site at nationalsecurityclearances.com has more information about our Firm and the numerous cases we win. If you want to Appeal a Security Clearance or do a Response to SOR – please call us.

Alan Edmunds is known as “The DOHA LAWYER” and one of “The Best Security Clearance Lawyers” in the country. Your job is important – call us today.

Dept. of Homeland Security
Guideline E – Personal Conduct
Guideline J – Criminal Conduct
Washington, D.C.
November 3, 2017

The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable decision on an Appeal National Security Clearance matter that involved a revocation of Access to Classified Material. The Hearing was conducted by ICE and attorney Ryan Nerney appeared for the Firm.

Testimony was taken and exhibits had been previously filed with the Department. The issue involved why the appellant had provided different explanations for leaving government employment. Attorney Nerney argued the “Whole Person Concept” in his presentation to the Panel.  The decision stated, “I credit your in-person presentation in light of the adjudication guidelines and the “whole person concept””. The Access was granted.

Saving jobs and careers is what The Edmunds Law Firm does best. We do it across the United States and around the globe before all Federal Agencies. Attorney Alan Edmunds has over 40 years of national security clearance experience. He has also appeared before several Military Security Clearance Hearing Boards. His record of success is publicly posted on the official DOHA web site for all to review. Be careful – many attorneys with “slick” web sites say they have experience but the DOHA web site shows otherwise. It’s your money and your career!

The Edmunds Law Firm has offices coast to coast including San Diego, Washington/Arlington, Jacksonville, Florida and Raleigh, North Carolina. The West coast office can be reached by dialing 800.481.2526 and the East coast offices at 571.527.4925. If you need a Response to SOR, Security Clearance Appeal or representation at a formal Security Clearance Hearing, please call our team of experts. You may also like to review our cases at nationalsecurityclearances.com

Department Of Defense
Favorable Decision – Guideline F
Woodland Hills, California
December 1, 2017

The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision following a contested Hearing involving Financial Concerns for a client who had 6 debts and was denied a security clearance. Total debt amounted to $26,000.

Our client is a 29-year-old woman, single and no children. She has an AA Degree. Attorney Ryan Nerney appeared on behalf of the Firm. Mr Nerney has done more hearings than most of the attorneys on the West coast that we have checked on the DOHA gov’t web site. His success is well known.

At the Hearing witnesses were called and numerous exhibits were admitted into the evidence. However, in this Hearing,  the real turning point was the courtroom presentation by Attorney Nerney. Many lawyers like to present themselves as experienced attorneys but when checked on the official gov’t web site at Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals their vast experience disappears! Be careful. Type in the Attorneys name on the DOHA search box and learn the truth. Your career is too important to trust “marketing hype” and misleading web site advertising.

If you want to do a Security Clearance Appeal, or need a Security Clearance Attorney, or submit documents please call. We also do Response to SOR for very reasonable fees.

This young woman did her research and her job was saved and her career intact. Call us at 800 481 2526.

U.S. Navy – Proposed Removal
November 10, 2017
Creating Hostile Work Environment
China Lake, NAVFAC

The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision on a case involving a civilian Physical Scientist who appealed an adverse decision that would have terminated his employment. Attorney Alan Edmunds has been helping Military and Civilian clients with employment actions on military bases around the globe for over 40 years. His knowledge is very specialized and his experience has gained him a reputation around the world as an aggressive trial attorney.

Alan Edmunds has over 40 yrs. experience in Military Law and National Security Clearance Law. He is a recognized subject matter expert for media in the United States and was recently featured in a Newsweek Magazine article about Security Clearance problems in the White House.

In this case our client had 6 years of excellent service with the Federal Gov’t. He had experienced difficulties in the work place. He had been suspended on one prior occasion.

Attorney Edmunds and his staff of experienced legal professionals filed an Appeal to the initial ruling and included numerous exhibits. A legal brief containing argument was also submitted that was over 20 pages in length.

In a written decision – the gov’t agreed with Attorney Edmunds and reversed its earlier decision. Our client was restored to his job and his career was saved. If you need help – call Attorney Alan Edmunds at 800 481 2526 or visit our web sites at nationalsecurityclearances.com or alanedmunds.com for more information. The Firm has an A+ rating with the San Diego BBB and works hard for our clients to achieve goals. Mr. Edmunds is known as ” The Best Military Lawyer ” and the Best Security Clearance Lawyer” by his clients. Don’t risk your job and your career – remember, “Experience Makes the Difference.”

Department Of Defense
November 20, 2017
Adultery Allegations & Soliciting Sex Acts
Hanover, MD

The Edmunds Law Firm, this country’s leading national security clearance law firm, received notice of another favorable decision from the Department of Defense arising from a SOR. The victory was following a Written Response to SOR. The case was amazing because it involved numerous allegations of soliciting sex acts and adultery.

The Written Response to SOR prepared by Attorney Brengle at the Edmunds Law Firm included numerous exhibits, a legal brief and proof of rehabilitation. Our client career and job were saved. His family could look forward to a secure Holiday because their father remained employed. Winning with just the Written Response is very difficult.  Normally most cases proceed to a Formal Security Clearance Appeal Hearing.

The Edmunds Law Firm has offices across the United States for our clients. Active Duty Military, Government Employees, as well as Civilian Contractors turn to Attorney Alan Edmunds for advice and guidance. Attorney Edmunds is the foremost Security Clearance Attorney in the country according to numerous sources. He not only appears with clients from coast to coast, he is also a Media Consultant in National Security Clearance matters. In his professional career spanning over 40 years Attorney Alan Edmunds has appeared on national news and in numerous newspapers for his casework.

If you need a Response to SOR, a formal Security Clearance Hearing Appeal Attorney or just have questions call 800.481.2526 and speak with an expert today.  Visit the official gov’t website at Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals and type in Attorney Edmunds name and review his cases.  Then compare the results with other attorneys. Remember, “Experience makes the Difference.”

Department Of Homeland Security
November 3, 2017
Criminal Conduct  & Personal Conduct
Washington, DC

A very special victory was received at The Edmunds Law Firm on a case with Homeland Security and ICE. Our client was fighting a previous finding that resulted in his clearance being denied.

The case involved a client who had resigned from his position due to misconduct during an interview. The facts were in dispute. Attorney Ryan Nerney appeared for the Firm. Ryan is an outstanding lawyer who handles cases across the United States. Attorney Edmunds and Attorney Nerney travel to all states on behalf of our Active Duty and Civilian clients. Attorney Edmunds has tried over 600 cases in the last 4 years. He is well known across the country and Asia and the Middle East as one of the Best Security Clearance Lawyers.

In this case the decision to revoke was overturned following Hearing. Attorney Nerney submitted evidence and took testimony during the Hearing. The client paid a one time flat fee and won his career and job back!!

The Firm does Responses to SORSecurity Clearance Appeals as well as Security Clearance Document Preparation. Call 800.481.2526 to speak with our experts about your case.  You may also wish to visit our web site at nationalsecurityclearances.com for more information.  Remember to check out the experience of our lawyers and any other on the official gov’t website at Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals. You will quickly learn that several attorneys don’t have the experience! Your career is too important – be smart and do your research.

Department of Defense
November 2, 2017
Guideline E: Personal Conduct
New Bern, North Carolina

Attorney Alan Edmunds received Notice of another favorable decision on a National Security Clearance case that was tried in North Carolina. The case involved Personal Conduct allegations including failing to provide truthful answers regarding employment and emotional health.  There were also allegations involving alcohol and criminal conduct.

This was a difficult case. Attorney Edmunds, who has over 40 years experience in military law and security clearance matters, used aggressive techniques and forensics to win this case. Alan Edmunds, often referred to as “The DOHA LAWYER”, has tried more than 600 cases in the last 4 years alone. He saved this client career and job.

Responses to SOR are very important and Security Clearance Appeals are just two areas where The Edmunds Law Firm helps clients around the world. Both Active Duty Military and Civilian Contractors with the DoD call Alan Edmunds when their careers are on the line. Our lawyers love to win and they do just that at an increasing rate. Check out our experience on the official Government Website at Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals. Just type in Alan Edmunds on the search line and learn about one of the country’s most successful attorneys. Many lawyers say they have experience but the government website says otherwise. It’s your career – hire the best attorney you can – your career is worth it! Call 800.481.2526 or visit us at one of our websites.

Victory From Written Response
October 26, 2017
Minneapolis, MN
Personal Conduct

The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable decision from a Written Response to SOR. The case was unique in that this was the second time our Law Firm helped this man with allegations against his Clearance. Each time our staff responded and we won.

This case involved a 39-year-old man who was former Air Force. Personal conduct allegations were brought against him. He is an Information Technology Specialist who needs an active Security Clearance to work and keep his job. The allegations contained facts involving Kenya Africa.

Attorney Ryan Nerney drafted the Response to SOR and sent it to the Agency with exhibits. When we win at this level it saves the client time and money. The client didn’t have to contend with a Formal Security Clearance Appeal Hearing.

The Edmunds Law Firm helps Active duty and Civilian around the globe. The Firm has a global reputation for aggressive representation. We want people to go to the DOHA web site and type in the names of our attorneys on the search line. The results are amazing and unmatched by any other law Firm. Attorney Edmunds has more Hearings on this site (Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals) on a national basis than other lawyers. Yet, many lawyers boast about their experience until a client checks them out on the gov’t sites. Be careful and call one of the most experienced law firms in the United States – The Edmunds Law Firm. “Experience makes the Difference.” Simply call 800.481.2526 or visit us at one of our web sites nationalsecurityclearances.com.

Department Of Defense Hearing
Oct 23,2017
Woodland Hills, California

The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable Security Clearance Appeal following a Personal Appearance in Woodland Hills, Calif. The comments of our client tell the story:

” I was just notified that my clearance was approved on the 22nd. I go back to work tomorrow !!!!”

Those words are what means the most to the attorneys at The Edmunds Law Firm who fight on behalf of our clients against the Government for security clearances. This case had it all as far as allegations. The SOR had financial issues of tax liens, criminal conduct which was later dismissed and debts totaling $17,677. From the start it looked really bad for our client. But then Attorney Ryan Nerney, for the Firm, took the case to Hearing and the case by the Gov’t fell apart. Again the words of our client says it best:

“Thank you so much for everything. I have no words to describe my gratitude for you and the Edmunds Law Firm for saving my career.”

Our success is no secret. Official government websites such as the one at DOHA – Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals – shows that the Edmunds Law Firm appears nationally more than most other law firms. And the victories by Attorney Alan Edmunds and Attorney Ryan Nerney far outnumber those of other attorneys. Do your own research. Some lawyers tell you they do nothing but security clearance work, yet on the government website they have very few Hearings. It’s your money and your career, don’t be fooled, compare results on the gov’t web site at DOHA.

Attorney Alan Edmunds is considered by many as ” The Best Security Clearance Lawyer in the country.” He is known coast to coast as ” The DOHA Lawyer.”

Call 800.481.2526 for immediate help. Active Duty Military, Federal Employees or DoD Contractors are welcome. Whether it’s a Response to SOR, an Appeal or just some sound advice – ask the pros at The Edmunds Law Firm.

Department Of Defense
October 19, 2017
Guideline F: Financial Concerns
Lexington Park, MD
Written Response Victory

The Edmunds Law Firm did it again – we were just notified that our client received his clearance back from a written Response to SOR that the Firm submitted with exhibits.

The case involved a retired Navy chief Warrant Officer who had 10 separate financial allegations on his SOR. He is married with 4 children and a wife who was unemployed. The family experienced periods of unemployment and financial turmoil due to family obligations.

The Firm did the Written Response to SOR with exhibits and a legal brief. Upon review of the Response the gov’t withdrew the SOR. Victory for our client and his family.

Attorney Alan Edmunds has been helping Active Duty and Civilian employees for over 40 years with Security Clearance Appeals. Just call us at 800.481.2526 and then relax!  Our experienced team of experts will take over and fight the gov’t every step.

We post favorable decisions each week on our Security Clearance sites for your review.

Department Of Defense
October 2017
Guideline B: Foreign Influence & Contacts – China
Woodland Hills, California

The Edmunds Law Firm received another favorable decision following a contested security clearance appeal. The case was heard in the Los Angeles area before an Administrative Judge.

The Applicant was a brilliant 61-year-old Ph.D Engineering Specialist. He is married and has one daughter. He has had a security clearance since 2005. He was born in China, has relatives still in China and he came to the United States on a J-1 Visa. His story is one of great hardship that included being sent to a labor camp as a teenager in China. Applicant became a citizen in 2000. He worked hard and now has a net worth in excess of 1 million dollars.

Attorney Ryan Nerney appeared for the Firm and argued the case citing mitigating factors under the guideline and presented copious evidence supporting the “whole person concept”. The Judge agreed with Attorney Nerney and found that the security clearance should be granted.

The Edmunds Law Firm is a national leader in Security Clearance Appeals and Response to SOR for both Civilian and Active Duty Military deployed around the globe. The Firm is full service and offers guidance throughout the whole process. Call 800.481.2526 for immediate help. Speak with Attorney Nerney or Attorney Alan Edmunds known as ” The DOHA Lawyer“. “Experience makes the Difference” and Attorney Edmunds has over 40 years security clearance and military law experience.

Department Of Defense
October 12,2017
Woodland Hills, California
Guideline F: Financial Concerns
Guideline E: Personal Conduct

The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision following a formal Hearing which was an Appeal to Security Clearance Denial. The Hearing was held in Woodland Hills, California.

Attorney Ryan Nerney appeared for the Firm and represented an Applicant who was age 52, with 2 adult children. He had been married for 28 years and then subsequently divorced. He is a Defense Contractor working as a Plant Protection Officer.

He had several debts, which resulted from health issues and loss of employment by his former wife. His financial status at the time of trial was excellent. Attorney Nerney offered exhibits A – Z and the applicant testified. The Applicant had held a security clearance for the past 31 years.

Attorney Nerney does Security Clearance Appeals and Responses to SOR. He travels on cases across the United States. The “Whole Person Concept ” was argued and the judge agreed that Mr. Nerney had mitigated the gov’t concerns and granted the Clearance. Another career was saved and a job left intact.

Call Attorney Alan Edmunds Or Attorney Ryan Nerney if you have questions or need aggressive representation. The Firm has offices in Calif, Virginia, Florida and North Carolina. The Firm helps Active Duty Military and Civilian contractor employees deployed around the globe.

Department Of Defense
October 3, 2017
Guideline B: Foreign Contacts – South Korea
Guideline F: Financial Concerns

The Edmunds Law Firm received notification from DoD of another favorable Security Clearance decision. It was a Security Clearance Appeal that went to a Formal Hearing.

The case was heard in California and Attorney Ryan Nerney appeared for the Firm. Mr Nerney is well known in the Security Clearance world as an aggressive attorney who wins cases. He has appeared across the United States before several different DoD Agencies.

The Applicant is a 37-year-old mother of 2 children, ages 6 and 2, both have dual citizenship. She came to the United States at age 13 from South Korea. She served in the U.S. Army and received a number of awards while serving. Applicant has numerous relatives in South Korea whom she contacts infrequently.  Attorney Nerney argued the longstanding relationship between South Korea and the United States. He introduced over 12 documents on her behalf. The Applicant also testified.

The judge found that the Attorney mitigated the financial concerns and the foreign influence concerns and granted the Clearance. The Edmunds Law Firm has offices in California, North Carolina, Arlington VA, and Florida. They are a powerhouse of trial attorneys who travel the country to help both Active Duty and Civilian contractors. Clients who are deployed call Attorney Alan Edmunds, the senior attorney, for help and guidance. Attorney Edmunds has appeared in over 550 Security Clearance Hearings. The Firm does Response to SOR, Security Clearance Appeals and preparation for SF 86 – to name a few of their services.

Call 800.481.2526 if your career is facing a security clearance challenge. Why not get the best help available. The official government website confirms Attorney Edmunds as one of the busiest security clearance attorneys in the country. Type in his name at the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals website.

Department Of Defense
October 2017
Favorable Decision From Written Response
Crane, Indiana

The Edmunds Law Firm filed an Appeal to SOR and received  a favorable decision without going to a formal Security Clearance Appeal. Our clients saved time and money.

This case involved an engineer who worked for Naval Surface Warfare. Attorney Alan Edmunds prepared a Response to SOR including exhibits and a legal brief. The documents totally mitigated the government concerns. Attorney Edmunds has over 40 years of experience in Military Law and National Security Clearance law. He is known across the country as a very aggressive litigator.

The case involved allegations under Guideline D: Sexual Behavior and Guideline J: Criminal Behavior. Evidence was included that showed under “the Whole Person” concept that the behavior was an isolated incident and that the Applicant had good character throughout his life.

The DoD agreed and his clearance was granted. We handle cases from across the country and around the globe. If you want guidance please call 800.481.2526. Response to SOR cases, Security Clearance Appeal cases and cases from Active Duty Military or Civilian Contractors are welcomed.

Department Of Defense
Video Conference Hearing – Kuwait
October 2, 2017
Guideline F: Financial Concerns
Guideline E: Personal Conduct

Attorney Alan Edmunds received a favorable decision following a formal Security Clearance Hearing that was conducted by video conferencing. Mr. Edmunds client was located in Kuwait and Attorney Edmunds was in Arlington VA with the Administrative Judge and the Gov’t Department Counsel.

The case was a Security Clearance Appeal following a Response to SOR. Although the client was in a remote location, client was fully prepared and gave a very detailed testimony.

Attorney Edmunds introduced Applicant Exhibits A through M. These exhibits laid the basis for the Applicant Defense and “The Whole Person Concept”. The exhibits also revealed the numerous efforts the Applicant made to satisfy her debts. The evidence showed she had periods of unemployment, deployment to remote countries and was assuming financial care for her relatives.

The Applicant is married, had 3 children and she was a defense contractor. The evidence also showed that her husband had lost employment at various times.

The judge agreed with Attorney Edmunds that the financial difficulties arose from circumstances beyond Applicant control. Attorney Edmunds argued that there was no evidence that Applicant was reckless with her finances and the judge agreed.

The clearance was granted and Applicant kept her DoD job. Attorney Edmunds helps clients around the globe. If you need a Response to SOR call us at 800.481.2526. If you want to Appeal and file a Security Clearance Appeal please call Mr. Edmunds today. He is known nationally as ” The DOHA Lawyer” with over 40-years of experience. Why trust your future to anyone else?

Favorable Decision From Written Response
October 10, 2017
Guideline E: Personal Conduct
Misuse And Sale Of Military Property
Papillon, Nebraska

The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable ruling from the Dept. of Defense following the submission of a written Response to SOR. The case involved allegations of misuse of government property.

Attorney Shane Brengle drafted the written Response with exhibits. He argued the “whole person” concept, as his client was a highly decorated member of the military. His rank was LT COL.

Attorney Edmunds helps clients around the globe. Active Duty Military and Civilian clients call him with national security clearance problems. His record is well documents on the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals website. Just type in Mr. Edmunds name and compare him to any other attorney. Alan Edmunds is often referred to as “the DOHA LAWYER”.

If you have received an SOR/LOI, or want to Appeal an adverse decision on a security clearance please call 800.481.2526 for immediate help. With offices coast to coast, The Edmunds Law Firm is this country’s leading national security clearance law firm.

Department Of Defense Hearing
September 18, 2017
Guideline F: Financial Concerns
Guideline E: Personal Conduct
Guideline B: Foreign Influence(Born In India)
Chicago, Illinois

The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable Security Clearance decision following a formal Hearing held in Chicago Illinois. The Applicant is 46 years old, married and born in India.

He has a bachelor’s degree and has worked as a defense contractor. He applied for a higher-level security clearance due to job requirements. He held a Public Trust. He had debts totaling $23,000 and allegations of Personal Conduct for failure to disclose past due judgments.

Attorney Ryan Nerney appeared for the Firm. Mr. Nerney has extensive experience in security clearance matters and has appeared before the Dept. of Defense in over 100 cases. The DOHA web site shows his work before DOHA on numerous occasions.

His appearances combined with Attorney Alan Edmunds appearances mentioned on the DOHA website makes the Edmunds Law Firm top in the national system of DOHA court cases. Many lawyers say they have experience before the DOHA courts but fall far short of the experience of The Edmunds Law Firm. The important question for clients is, do you value having an experienced attorney who knows how to win? The big difference Attorney Edmunds and Attorney Nerney bring to the courtroom is experience and knowledge.

In this case Attorney Nerney called witnesses, submitted numerous exhibits and also filed an evidence of “the whole person concept”. Mr. Nerney filed an Administrative Notice for India. In the end the court stated: “national security eligibility for access to classified information is granted.” The client kept his job and his career.

If you have questions or need advice call 800.481.2526 and speak with Attorney Nerney or Attorney Edmunds. Active Duty or civilian can call for Security Clearance Appeals, Responses to SOR, SF 86 Consults and Letters of Intent. Visit nationalsecurityclearances.com

Department of Homeland Security
August 18, 2017
Financial Concerns: Taxes & Debts
Gulf Breeze, Florida
Favorable Decision From Written Response

The Edmunds Law Firm received a Notice of Favorable Decision from DHS on a case involving a 49 years old client from Florida who was single and no children. His job is counter-terrorism Special Agent.

His tax problems included a tax lien and several small overdue debts amounting to about $15,000. The written Response was over 20 pages long and included several items in mitigation. Attorney Edmunds alleged unemployment and economic downturn.

The client has had a Clearance for 10 years. Attorney Edmunds filed proof of satisfaction of debt payments and argued the “whole person” concept.

Winning a favorable decision from Written Response is difficult. The Edmunds Law Firm works hard to achieve this goal, which can save our clients money and time. Attorney Alan Edmunds handles cases from every DoD Agency and several other Federal Agencies. He and his staff attorneys travel across the country helping clients who may be Active Duty or Civilian Contractors as well as Federal Employees. Few attorneys in the United States possess the experience and number of security clearance hearings as Mr. Edmunds. Experience makes a huge difference in these cases. Attorney Edmunds cautions callers against lawyers with fake experience. So many claim vast numbers of Hearings but the gov’t DOHA site tells otherwise. “Buyer Beware”!

The Edmunds Law Firm does Responses to SORSecurity Clearance Appeals, Military Security Clearances and SF 86 document preparation. Call 800.481.2526 and meet one of the most incredible attorneys in the area of national security clearance law. Remember – your case is very important to us!

September 12, 2017
Department Of Defense Hearing
Guideline F: Financial Concerns
Guideline E: Personal Conduct
Arlington, VA

Attorney Alan Edmunds, this country’s leading national security clearance attorney, received notice of another favorable decision from the court on a case that he argued in Arlington VA.

The case involved an applicant who was prior Army and had worked several defense contractor jobs. He is married and has 4 children. He had numerous debts but Attorney Edmunds provided proof of identity theft, which ruined his credit and created many of the debt problems. His wife also lost her job and this contributed to his debt problems as well.

At the Hearing the Applicant was doing much better financially.  Debts were paid or successfully disputed.

The judge agreed with Attorney Edmunds that the SOR had ben mitigated and that the Applicant was trustworthy. The judge concluded, “eligibility for access to classified information is granted.” Attorney Alan Edmunds success is well documented; he has appeared over 600 times before Security Clearance Hearings. Often called, The Best Security Clearance Attorney in the country, Mr. Edmunds helps Active Duty Military and Civilian Contractors deployed around the globe.

Don’t take chances with your job or career. The Edmunds Law Firm handles all Responses to SOR, Security Clearance Appeals, DOHA Appeals and Military Security Clearance cases.

Call 800.481.2526 for immediate help and solutions.

August 2017
Department Of Defense Hearing
Guideline F: Financial Concerns
Tampa, Florida

The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision following a Hearing on a case involving a 40 yrs. old defense contractor who worked in the Tampa area in Florida. Applicant had a BA Degree and was single with no children.

The Applicant had 5 delinquent debts totaling less than $15,000. He had experienced hardship including death of a father, a brother who was disabled and the negligent care of his finances while he was deployed,

Attorney Alan Edmunds handled the case at the Hearing. Mr. Edmunds entered exhibits A-S on behalf of his client. He also took testimony from the Applicant and one other witness.

Attorney Edmunds argues unexpected medical emergency and the behavior happened so long ago and under circumstances that were unlikely to reoccur. The judge agreed.

The Clearance was granted and Attorney Edmunds helped another deserving client save his job and career. Call 800.481.2526 if you need help or have questions. Mr. Edmunds helps Active Duty and Civilian Contractors deployed around the globe.

August 8, 2017
Department Of Defense Hearing
Sacramento, California
Linguist From Afghanistan
Guideline B: Foreign Influence

The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision of a Linguist who had both Afghanistan and Pakistan influence concerns. The Firm helps hundreds of Linguists deployed around the globe with Security Clearance issues.

Attorney Ryan Nerney, whose success in the courtroom is featured on the official DOHA web site under his name, handled this case. If perspective customers would “fact check” the attorneys they talk to against the official DOHA website they would find that many lawyers might have very little experience even though their web sites say the contrary and that these lawyers may not travel across the county as advertised.

Clients need to learn what attorneys actually have experience and a record of success. Attorney Edmunds receives calls from applicants who went to the Hearing with a lawyer that wasn’t experienced and they lost the case. Your career and job is important. Be careful!!

In this case Attorney Nerney took testimony from witnesses. The issue was that our client sent money home to his mother not realizing that it would raise a concern with the DoD. Other issues included relatives in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Attorney Nerney showed that contacts with these individuals were very infrequent. He argued the “whole person concept’ which the judge found to be significant.

The Applicant was granted access to classified information. His job was saved and his career will advance. Call the Firm at 800.481.2526 or visit us on our web site at nationalsecurityclearances.com

August 3, 2017
Petty Theft & Time Card Fraud
Mclean, Virginia
Department Of Defense

The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable Security Clearance decision following a submission to an SOR. This was an important result because the client had their clearance reinstated without a Formal DOHA Security Clearance Hearing. The savings in time and money was considerable.

The case involved allegations of Petty Theft, Time Card Fraud as well as Financial considerations under Guideline F of the DoD Directive 5220.6 – The law firm submitted a complete Response to SOR that included argument and exhibits. The client was charged one simple flat fee for services – no hourly fees.

Attorney Alan Edmunds has over 40 years of experience helping Active Duty and Civilian employees as well as DoD Contractors with Security Clearance problems. He can help you as well – just call 800.481.2526. The Edmunds Law Firm has offices coast to coast and offers excellent customer service. The San Diego Better Business Bureau rates the Firm A+.

The Law Firm has 2 very busy offices in Arlington, VA and Jacksonville, Florida for Defense Contractor Clients. We do a lot of business with Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and Northrop Grumman employees fighting for security clearances.

Also, anyone can go to the official DOHA web site and confirm that Attorney Alan Edmunds has over 500 Hearings before DOHA just in the last 4 years. Some attorneys say they have experience but the DOHA site doesn’t agree!! They hope people won’t “fact check” their web sites and experience. Be careful – your career is very important. Mr. Edmunds is often called ” The DOHA LAWYER” because of his national experience.

August 7, 2017
Department Of Defense
Guideline F: Financial Concerns
Guideline G: Alcohol Consumption
Tampa, Florida

Department of Defense notified Attorney Alan Edmunds of a favorable decision following a contested Security Clearance Hearing convened in Tampa Florida.

Our client is a 40-year-old defense contractor who is single with no children.  He has a Computer Science degree and had never served in the military. The applicant had 5 delinquent debts. He entrusted a relative to pay his bills while deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan. The relative did a poor job of paying bills.

On the alcohol Consumption allegation the client had stopped drinking alcohol. He showed clean tests. He also enrolled in and successfully completed alcohol treatment. Attorney Edmunds introduced several exhibits that showed strong mitigation and called witnesses as well as the Applicant.

Attorney Edmunds is not stranger to DOHA Security Clearance Hearings. People call him “the DOHA LAWYER”.  He travels the country helping people save their jobs and careers  Mr. Edmunds provides services that include Response to SOR, Security Clearance Hearings and Security Clearance Appeals. He appears before DOHA, NSA, DIA, DOE, ICE, NRO and several other Agencies.

Call 800.481.2526 for immediate help. Visit nationalsecurityclearances.com for immediate guidance.

Department Of Defense
July 27, 2017
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Guideline B: Foreign Influence
Guideline F: Financial Concerns

The Edmunds Law Firm received another favorable decision on a National Security Clearance case. The client was an active duty Air Force. He was an officer who had financial concerns that involved large deposits and foreign influence due to relatives from Nigeria.

The client is married to a doctor and no children. He has been on active duty for 12 years. He had personal conduct allegations due to relatives and travel to different countries.

Attorney Alan Edmunds helps clients around the globe with security clearance problems. Active Duty military call Attorney Edmunds to help clear up security problems but also save their careers. Active Duty officers must have security clearances to do their jobs. In this case the career would have been lost if the Clearance was not granted.

If you need a Response to SOR, a Security Clearance Appeal – bring in the Best Security Clearance Attorney available – call Mr. Edmunds at 800 481 2526. Please visit our web site at nationalsecurityclearances.com and review all of our recent case victories.

Department Of Defense
July 27,2017
New York City
Guideline E – Personal Conduct
Guideline F – Financial Concerns
Guideline J – Criminal Conduct

The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable decision in a Security Clearance case that was very difficult to present. The client is a 27 years old single women and former Army.

This young woman was active duty and had 3 deployments. She had drug use, which she admitted and allegations of bad debts, which the client denied. She also alleged that the debts were not hers but due to identity theft.

The Edmunds Law Firm, which is this country’s leading law firm in National Security Clearance matters, submitted a written Response to SOR with numerous exhibits and a legal brief.

The DoD reviewed the package from Attorney Alan Edmunds and granted the clearance. Attorney Edmunds is often called “The Best Security Clearance Attorney” in the country. He has over 40 years of experience and has offices coast to coast. He personally has done over 400 Security Clearance Hearings within the last 4 years alone.  He helps Active Duty Military and civilian employees deployed around the globe.

Security Clearance Granted – Pakistan
Department of Defense
June 28, 2017
Guideline B: Foreign Contacts
Arlington, VA

On May 31, 2017 Attorney Alan Edmunds appeared at a formal security clearance Hearing in Arlington VA. The case involved a linguist who had ties to Pakistan. The relatives included a mother, four brothers and three sisters. The gov’t also alleged that our client had close and continuous ties with friends in Pakistan.

Attorney Edmunds introduced 18 exhibits. Testimony was also taken from the 34 year old Applicant who is a contractor for DoD . He had a bachelor’s degree and is married with two small children. Applicant was born and raised in Pakistan. He became a US citizen in March 2013.

Attorney Edmunds argued the mitigating factors and offered considerable evidence to support the “whole person concept”. The judge agreed with the argument of Mr. Edmunds and the Security Clearance was granted.

Attorney Edmunds has offices coast to coast to help both civilian and Active Duty military clients. He does Response to SOR, Security Clearance Appeals and appears at Formal Security Clearance Hearings all over the United States.

If you have questions and want the experience of one of the country’s leading security clearance attorneys, please call 800.481.2526 and ask for Attorney Edmunds, who is often referred to as “The DOHA Lawyer“.

Department of Defense
May 23, 2017
Guideline E & K: Personal Conduct & Handling Protected Information
Orlando, Florida

On May 23, 2017, a favorable decision was made for The Edmunds Law Firm and their 55-year-old client, who is employed as an executive for a federal contractor.  Mr. Edmunds, who is considered to be “one of the Best Security Clearance Lawyers,” in the United States, successfully mitigated all allegations of Personal Conduct and Handling Protected Information with Exhibits A-K.  The client has been with her current employer since 1989 and has held a security clearance since at least 1999.  The client is a mentor for young female executives at her company, being selected as one of the top five women executives in her traditionally male dominated field, clearly an asset to her company’s productivity.  Mr. Edmunds bold and forthright approach at the hearing clearly paved the way for a favorable decision and her continued access to classified information.

Do not trust your security clearance adjudications process to just any junior level firm.  The Edmunds Law Firm has been in the business of assisting individuals with their security clearances for more than 40 years, including SF-86 preparation, Response to SOR/LOI, FOIA Requests, Personal Appearances and Appeals.  If you have a security clearance matter that you need handled by a powerhouse firm with individuals who will fight for you and your career, then please give The Edmunds Law Firm a call today!

Department of Homeland Security
March 8, 2017
Guideline E: Personal Conduct/Guideline F: Financial Considerations/Guideline J: Criminal Conduct

The Edmunds Law Firm has been assisting clients with adjudicating their matters, with favorable results, for more than 40 years.  Mr. Alan V. Edmunds and his powerhouse team of lawyers will fight for you, just like they did for their client with Personal Conduct, Financial and Criminal allegations.  The Department of Homeland Security issued a Notice of Proposed Action with The Edmunds Law Firm tediously getting right to work in forming the official Response to the Department.  Armed with a plethora of exhibits to include with the Response, the Department issued a favorable decision in the matter, with all allegations being mitigated.  Do not trust just anyone to formulate a perfect Response back to allegations, trust The Edmunds Law Firm to fight for your career and reputation, contact us today!

  • Handling Protected Information and Personal Conduct

    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    MAY 23, 2017
    GUDIELINES E, K: HANDLING PROTECTED INFORMATION, PERSONAL CONDUCT
    ARLINGTON, VA

    This case involved a Senior Executive Contractor who was accused of mishandling protected information. A Statement of Reasons was issued. The Contractor personally responded, which did not mitigate the Government’s concerns. This case was then referred and scheduled for a Hearing. Mr. Edmunds was hired, and he immediately went into action and put his 40 years of professional service to work with this client. Every Hearing case requires work and preparation prior to the Hearing. The staff at the Edmunds Law Firm provided the client with every detail that would be needed for Mr. Edmunds to successfully present this case at the Hearing. At the Hearing, Mr. Edmunds presented evidence and arguments at this Executive’s Hearing, and the end result was in favor of the Senior Contractor. Mr. Edmunds’ 40 years of experience on handling these types of cases, and his litigation skills, makes his firm very successful in winning even the most difficult cases.

    When a Statement of Reasons is issued to a Government Contractor, or Federal Employee, it places a heavy burden on an individual. Do not respond to a Statement of Reasons by yourself. This is a serious and complex matter. Let the professionals at The Edmunds Law Firm lift that burden and help with this potentially career ending situation. We take on the most difficult cases, and will always provide you with the best service possible. If you cherish your security clearance, your career, and your livelihood, call Mr. Edmunds at 1-800-481-2526. WE CAN HELP!

  • Foreign Preference, Foreign Influence, and Personal Conduct

    INDIA – SECURITY CLEARANCE
    MAY 19, 2017
    ARLINGTON, VA
    GUIDELINES: B, C, & E

    Attorney Alan Edmunds, received Notice of a Formal Granting of Security Clearance on this date when the gov’t decided to withdraw their SOR and objection to Applicants request for a Clearance and instead – grant the clearance without a Formal Security Clearance Hearing.

    Attorney Alan Edmunds had sent Notice of Representation to the gov’t. The case was being calendared for a Formal Security Clearance Appeal Hearing. The allegations included the fact that the Applicant had relatives in India.

    The case involved a woman who moved to the USA in 2002 and became a naturalized citizen in 2013. She sent support to her mother-in- law over the years. She also had passports issued from India.

    The Edmunds Law Firm argued mitigating factors and submitted other information for the gov’t consideration. After careful review of the contentions of Attorney Edmunds, who is known as “The Best Security Clearance Attorney”, in the country by many of his clients – the gov’t withdrew their case and granted the Clearance. Mr. Edmunds also helps client with Security Clearance Appeals and Formal Security Clearance Hearings. He has traveled to India on several occasions and enjoys helping clients from India.

    If you want the best help with your security clearance problems – call Attorney Edmunds at 800-481-2526 or visit nationalsecurityclearances.com

  • Linguist Matter

    LINGUIST – IRAQ
    MAY 12, 2017
    GUIDELINE B: FOREIGN INFLUENCE
    DEPT OF DEFENSE
    ARLINGTON, VA

    The Edmunds Law Firm received another favorable decision involving a Linguist who worked for the DoD in Iraq.

    The case was presented to the court by Attorney Alan Edmunds. Mr. Edmunds has been helping clients both civilian and active duty military for over 40 years and is considered one of “the Best Security Clearance Lawyers”, in the United States by many people. His clients span the globe and one community that he helps often is the professional linguist community deployed in Iraq, Kuwait, and Afghanistan.

    This case involved a 39 year old linguist who was married and had 2 children. He had relatives living in Iraq. He and his wife were both U.S. Citizens, however born in Iraq and immigrated to the U.S later. They entered the U.S. in the Special Immigrant Visa program.

    The Applicant worked for the Army and other military units. He hired Attorney Alan Edmunds to represent him at the Security Clearance Appeal Hearing. Attorney Edmunds has done over 600 Security Clearance Hearings in just the last 4 years. His record of appearances is kept on the official gov’t web site at DOHA. His victories appear also on his various web sites for client review.

    If you have Security Clearance Application questions or need a Response to SOR call 800-481-2526 or visit nationalsecurityclearances.com.

  • FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    MAY 10. 2017
    GUIDELINE F: FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
    CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

    This case involved a Government Contractor who received a Statement of Reasons for Financial Considerations, which included thousands of dollars of debt, and for failing to file Income Taxes for a period of five years. Financial Considerations are one of the most common Guidelines used for a denial of a Security Clearance. This Contractor responded on his own, which was adjudicated unfavorably. This case was referred to DOHA and scheduled for a Hearing. Applicant contacted Mr. Edmunds, where the Hearing process was explained. Having 40 years of experience with these types of cases, Mr. Edmunds knew exactly what documents would be required to support his case at the Hearing. Mr. Edmunds provided numerous mitigating documents that showed the Government that it was in the best interest to grant Applicant a clearance. Once again, the end result was a favorable decision for Applicant.

    These situations become very complex, and any attempts to represent yourself at any Government Hearing will most likely result in an unfavorable decision. Mr. Edmunds and his staff continue to save careers. There is no doubt that Mr. Alan Edmunds is #1 in the country in saving Security Clearances. Go to the DOHA Website and search Alan Edmunds, and you will see firsthand, the hundreds of victories under his name. A loss of a clearance can also result in loss of employment. Contacting The Edmunds Law Firm will be a smart decision and a small price to pay to save your career. DO NOT TAKE THIS COMPLEX SITUATION ON BY YOURSELF! CONTACT THE EDMUNDS LAW FIRM AT 1-800-481-2526.

  • Excessive Alcohol Consumption

    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    MAY 9, 2017
    GUDIELINE G: EXCESSIVE ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION
    ?CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

    Attorney Alan Edmunds appeared in Charleston, South Carolina for a National Security Clearance Formal Hearing on issues of alcohol use. The allegations included two DUI’s and a diagnoses of alcohol abuse.

    The Applicant is a 39 year old Defense Contractor. He has had no alcohol related incidents since 2008. Attorney Edmunds introduced exhibits A thru H. Mr. Edmunds argued mitigating factors and introduced testimony from the Applicant.

    The Edmunds Law Firm represents clients both Active Duty Military, and Civilian contractors around the globe. The “Linguist Community” in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan . According to Gov’t web sites that track DOHA Hearings – Attorney Edmunds has appeared in over 600 cases just in the last 4 years. His success rate is also reported on these sites for your review. It’s one thing for an attorney to “say” they win but it’s another to “actually prove you win”.

    His Law Firm helps with every aspect of the security clearance process from SF 86 prep to Security Clearance Appeals. Attorney Edmunds is often referred to by his clients as ” The DOHA Attorney”. He also appears with all other gov’t agencies such as DIA,DOE,FBI, CIA, ICE, NGO just to name a few. His 40 years of experience can make a huge difference for your case and your career. Call 800-481-2562

  • Foreign Influence & Foreign Preferences

    APRIL 25, 2017
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    ARLINGTON, VA
    GUIDELINE B: FOREIGN INFLUENCE
    GUIDELINE C: FOREIGN PREFERENCES

    Alan Edmunds, founding attorney at the San Diego-based The Edmunds Law Firm, has obtained a positive resolution of a national security clearance matter from the Department of Defense. Mr. Edmunds represented a 51-year-old woman during the hearing, a United States citizen and who had attained Lebanese citizenship from a former marriage (the client is divorced with no children). The woman also possessed a joint bank account in Jordan, which she testified had been closed. These factors threatened her ability to gain the security clearance she needed to move forward with her job and protect her career.

    The amount and quality of mitigating evidence presented by Attorney Edmunds, combined with the straightforward and compelling testimony of the applicant, led to the granting of security clearance to the applicant by the judge. Her job and career are no longer in danger.

    Attorney Alan Edmunds is widely considered “The” security clearance lawyer, deftly handling cases related to security clearance hearings, appeals, response to SOR, and more. He travels all over the country to represent civilian and active duty contractors with their security clearance matters. If you need representation, please contact The Edmunds Law Firm at (800) 481-2526 to request a case evaluation.

  • Foreign Preference and Foreign Influence

    CHINA SECURITY CLEARANCE CASE
    APRIL 25, 2017
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    BOSTON, MASS
    GUIDELINE C: FOREIGN PREFERENCE
    GUIDELINE B: FOREIGN INFLUENCE

    The Edmunds Law Firm a national law firm with offices across the country, received Notice of a favorable decision following a formal Hearing on a National Security Clearance case.

    The case concerned a brilliant 44 year old woman who has a PhD in Applied Physical science. The evidence showed that applicant and her family suffered greatly from political persecution during the Chinese cultural revolution.

    Applicant lost both of her parents in an automobile accident. She is married and has 2 daughter born in the United States. Evidence showed that applicant reaffirmed in the presence of her FSO that she had no allegiance to any foreign state. Applicant had no family members of her own in China.

    Attorney Edmunds introduced numerous documents into evidence and also called several witnesses to testify about applicants character and work performance.

    The judge found that it was clearly consistent with the national interest to grant security clearance eligibility.

    Attorney Alan Edmunds is a well known Security Clearance Lawyer on a national level. His clients are both Active Duty Military and Civilian contractors as well as gov’t employees. Call him at 800-481-2526 or nationalsecurityclearances.com

  • Financial Concerns

    MARCH 27 , 2017
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    WOODLAND HILLS, CA

    GUDIELINE F: FINANCIAL CONCERNS

    The Edmunds Law Firm received 3 favorable decisions in one day on National Security Clearance matters beforeDOHA. In this case the issue was financial debts including student loans.

    The Firm was represented by Attorney Ryan Nerney. The Applicant thru her attorney entered exhibits A thru R into evidence. Attorney Nerney called 2 witnesses in addition to the Applicant.

    The Applicant is 48 years old, single and the mother of 3 children. She is employed as a DoD defense contractor. The Applicant suffered from income issues and had a repossessed vehicle. She disputed some of the debts in question but showed the court that she had made arrangements for repayment and Attorney Nerney showed strong mitigation. The court found in favor of the Applicant and her job and career were saved.

    The Edmunds Law Firm helps clients each step of the way in the Security Clearance process.Response to SOR, SF 86 preparation, and Appeals to Security Clearance Denials are some of the services the Firm offers. Attorney Alan Edmunds , the owner of the Firm, is known as “The DOHA Lawyer“. He appears across the country for clients.

    The Firm has offices in Calif, Florida and Arlington VA. for the convenience of our clients. Call 800-481-2526 for help or visit nationalsecurityclearances.com

  • Financial Concerns

    MARCH 22, 2017
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH

    GUDIELINE F: FINANCIAL CONCERNS

    The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision following a Formal Security Clearance Hearing held in Sal Lake City Utah. The case alleged financial concerns due to 6 debts totaling $89,000.

    Our client filed a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, but later dismissed it and dealt with the debts himself. The judge found that the conduct of the Applicant and his evidenced introduced by Attorney Ryan Nerney at trial was compelling and totally mitigated the gov’t concerns. In fact the judge felt Attorney Nerney did such a good job that he proposed a summary disposition in favor of the Applicant.

    The Edmunds Law Firm has been helping clients, both Active Duty Military and Civilian , around the globe for over 40 years. WE are the leader in security clearance litigation. Our attorneys are trained by one of the Best Security Clearance Lawyers in the country, Attorney Alan Edmunds.

    Your career is important and so is your job – don’t trust it to any attorney with a fancy web site who has few if any favorable case decisions. Check out the attorney on theDOHA web site and see how many cases they actually have won. Attorney Edmunds has completed over 600 Security Clearance Appeals in just the last 4 years. He can be reached at 800-481-2526 or schedule an appointment in our offices in Washington DC/ Arlington, VA; San Diego, Ca; Jacksonville, FLA or Raleigh, North Carolina.

  • Personal Conduct

    MARCH 13,2017
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
    GUIDELINE G & J: PERSONAL CONDUCT

    On March 13, The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of another favorable decision in anational security clearance case. Attorney Edmunds appeared for the Firm in North Carolina. The Applicant had 2 DUIs and allegations of inappropriate conduct in public.

    The client needed his job and career for family and personal reasons. He was told that he was about to lose his job and then he hired Attorney Alan Edmunds. Today the client is back at work and his pay restored.

    Alan Edmunds is a man who helps the “underdog” fight the gov’t . For over 40 years he has traveled across the country for his clients. He has offices in Calif, Florida, Arlington VA and North Carolina. If you have an SOR and need a Response to SOR or if you have a Hearing date and want a Security Clearance Lawyer for the Hearing call us today at 800 481 26526 or visit nationalsecurityclearances.com

    He represents Active Duty Military in Security Clearance Cases or Civilian contractors. Don’t risk your career – call us today at 800-481-2526.

  • MARCH 10 , 2017
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    ARLINGTON, VA

    SECURITY CLEARANCE VICTORY FOLLOWING HEARING
    GUDIELINE F: FINANCIAL CONCERNS
    Attorney Alan Edmunds of The Edmunds Law Firm received another favorable decision in a national security clearance hearing held in Arlington Va. The case was very difficult because the gov’t alleged 17 past due debts or obligations owed by the Applicant in a Statement of Reasons.Guideline F cases are very difficult and Attorney Edmunds has been winning these cases for years. In fact, much to the disappointment of his competitors his Trial record appears on the official gov’t web site at DOHA which reveals over 600 Trials in just the last 4 years. His favorable decisions also appear on this site. Attorney Edmunds is known across the country as “The Best Security Clearance Lawyer” by numerous clients. He has also been called , “The DOHA Lawyer” because he represents so many people across the country and around the globe before DOHA Judges.TheLinguist Community in the Middle East rely on the expertise of Attorney Edmunds to help them keep their DoD jobs with the U.S. Military. Alan Edmunds represents Active Duty Military and Civilian Contractors who are deployed around the globe.In this recent victory, the client was a 60 year old defense contractor. He was a senior project leader who had 2 divorces, 3 children and going forward a good salary to resolve debts. What made this case unusual was the fact of a “malicious cyber intrusion ” that included some of applicants personal information.The judge found that the evidence mitigated all of the govt’ concerns and the ruling was favorable. another career saved and another applicant who was able to keep his job. Call Alan Edmunds at 800 481 2526 for help and guidance with all security clearance issues. He has appeared before numerous gov’t Agencies including DIA, CIA, FBI, ICE, DOHA, DOE, NSA, NRO, and Dept of State. Your career is important – don’t’ risk your future. Call The Edmunds Law Firm.
  • Foreign Influence

    MARCH 7, 2017
    DEPT OF DEFENSE
    CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
    GUIDELINE B: FOREIGN INFLUENCE

    Attorney Alan Edmunds received notice of a favorable court decision following a contested Security Clearance Hearing held in Chicago. The case involve a linguist who worked for the Dept of Defense in Iraq. He had relatives that were citizens of Iraq. He was born in Iraq and went to high school in Iraq. He became a citizen of the U.S. in 2010.

    Attorney Edmunds, this country’s lading security clearance attorney, presented the case for Applicant. Attorney Edmunds showed Applicants pride in his U.S. citizenship through testimony and letters of recommendation fromActive Duty Military Officers.

    The judge agreed with Attorney Edmunds that the evidence demonstrated, ” deep and longstanding relationships and loyalties in the U.S.” The client kept his clearance and his job.

    The Edmunds Law Firm represents clients across the country and around the globe. The official DOHA web site shows that Attorney Edmunds is one of the most popular and successful security clearance lawyers in the entire country. Why trust your future or career to an attorney who doesn’t win or has little experience? Call 800 481 2526 for a free consult. Meet one of the most dynamic and successful attorneys in the country in the area of National Security Clearance law.

    Active Duty Military and Civilian Contractors often turn to Alan Edmunds for help. He has been often called ,” The Best Security Clearance Lawyer in the country by his clients. Do you need to do aResponse to SOR, complete anSF 86, or Appeal a Security Clearance Denial ? If so call 800 471 2526 and ask for Attorney Alan Edmunds.

  • Personal Conduct

    FEBRUARY 28, 2017
    U.S. DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
    WASHINGTON, D.C.
    GUIDELINE E: PERSONAL CONDUCT
    GUIDELINE J: CRIMINAL CONDUCT

    The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable decision from FEMA, Dept of Homeland Security. The case involved allegations of Criminal Conduct including Assault and Battery and Trespassing.

    The favorable decision was the result of a Written Response to LOI that was drafted and submitted by Attorney Alan Edmunds. The Response included exhibits and a legal brief that discussed mitigation of the allegations.

    This was an important victory for our client because the clearance was granted following a Written Response to LOI without a formal hearing. The client saved money, time and was back at work quickly.

    Attorney Alan Edmunds is this country’s leading attorney in the area of National Security Clearance representation. He travels across the country helping clients from a variety of Federal Agencies as well as Active Duty Military defend gov’t allegations that could cause a revocation of their Clearance. Clients that need a Response to SOR, or representation at aSecurity Clearance Hearing, including aDOHA Hearing can call Attorney Edmunds for guidance. His trial results are reported on the official DOHA gov’t web site. He has completed over 600 Hearings in the last 4 years alone. Attorney Edmunds appears on security clearance matters before, CIA, FBI, NSA, DOE, NRO and DOHA. He is often referred to as “The DOHA Attorney“. Call 800 481 2526 for answers to questions. Your career is important – call Attorney Edmunds and get the best help available.

  • Illegal Drug Use

    FEBRUARY 23,2017
    WOODLAND HILLS, CALIF
    GUIDELINE H :ILLEGAL DRUG USE

    The Edmunds Law Firm received another favorable decision in a National Security Clearance which was filed with the DOHA court on 2-16-2017. The allegations in the SOR included Cocaine use, Marijuana use and Ecstasy use. The Applicant was also cited for sale of Marijuana. All of the allegations occurred between 2012 and 2014.

    This was clearly a case in mitigation for Attorney Ryan Nerney who appeared for the Firm. Attorney Nerney has an impressive record of favorable decisions across the country in national security clearance matters.

    The Applicant was 22 years old, unmarried with no children and a college BA Degree.. As an Aerospace Engineer the Applicant did an incredible job of turning his life around following college. Attorney Nerney presented a strong case in mitigation. A report from a licensed Social Worker was very compelling for the Applicant. The report stated Applicant had a “low probability of substance abuse in the future.”

    After presentation of all of the evidence the Judge found, ” the behavior waas so infrequent” an happened under …circumstances that it is unlikely to recur…”.For the Edmunds Law Firm, this country’s leading Security Clearance Law Firm – this was another career save.Alan Edmunds is known as theBest Security Clearance Lawyer, and he trains the attorneys in the Firm to be trial lawyers. The Firm does , Response to SOR, DOHA Appeals, and SF 86 reviews. Call 800-481-2526 for assistance with your case. Attorney Edmunds helps Active Duty Military with Military Security Clearance cases ass well as civilian Contractors deployed around the world.One important group of clients for the Firm are DoD Linguists who serve in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan and work for the U.S. Military and DoD Contractors. Call Attorney Edmunds, ” The DOHA Lawyer” today .

    Visit our web sites for more information at www.nationalsecurityclearances.com

  • Financial Concerns

    FEB. 21, 2017
    ARLINGTON, VA
    GUIDELINE F: FINANCIAL CONCERNS
    FAVORABLE DECISION FOLLOWING HEARING

    Attorney Alan Edmunds received another favorable decision from the Dept of Defense on a national security clearance case. The allegations included Guideline

    F: Financial concerns. The clients Clearance was revoked due to unpaid bills and the Applicant hired The Edmunds Law Firm for the Appeal of Security Clearance.

    The facts showed the Applicant had 6 late/unpaid debts. He was a High School graduate, had prior Navy military service and had periods of unemployment. At the time of the Hearing he had a Security Clearance for the last 10 years.

    The judge agreed with the arguments of Attorney Alan Edmunds , this country’s leading Security Clearance Lawyer, when he argued that the events in applicants life are unlikely to repeat and that the Applicant has been making payments to creditors.

    The Clearance was reinstated. The Applicant kept his job and his career. The Edmunds Law Firm also did theResponse to SOR and submitted exhibits A thru L at the Hearing.

    Attorney Edmunds represent Active Duty Military and Civilian Contractors deployed around the globe. He is very popular with the Linguist community deployed to Iraq. Several Linguists Security Clearance cases are reported on the Firm web sites.

    Attorney Alan Edmunds has been called, The Best Security Clearance Attorney in the country by many clients. His record of success appears on the official DOHA web site. Call 800 481 2526 or visit nationalsecurityclearances.com

  • Personal Conduct

    FEB 6, 2017
    NSA
    ANNAPOLIS JUNCTION, MD
    GUIDELINE E: PERSONAL CONDUCT

    Attorney Alan Edmunds received notice of another favorable security clearance decision from NSA on 2-6-17. The case involved an Applicant for Access who had used marijuana and prescription drugs that were prescribed to her mother.

    What made the case so interesting was that the drug use occurred when the Applicant was in her late 40’s and early 50’s. She was married and had children.

    Attorney Edmunds argued the “whole person concept” and the fact that there had been complete rehabilitation. Testimony was given and numerous documents were admitted into evidence.

    Attorney Edmunds is known was the “Best Security Clearance Attorney” by many clients around the globe who he has helped keep their jobs. Alan Edmunds has over 40 yrs of military and security experience. His Firm has offices coast to coast.

    The Edmunds Law Firm helps clients with Responses to SOR, Security Clearance Appeals, DOHA Hearings, andSF 86 Prep. Call Mr. Edmunds at 800 481 2526 for immediate guidance with your case. Review the DOHA web site and learn about Attorney Edmunds success across the country. He stands alone as an outstanding security clearance lawyer.

  • Drug Involvement and Personal Conduct

    JAN. 27,2017
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    GUIDELINE H: DRUG INVOLVEMENT
    GUIDELINE E: PERSONAL CONDUCT
    ARLINGTON, VA

    The Edmunds Law Firm received another favorable decision from DOHA which is reported on their official web site for review. Attorney Alan Edmunds is this country’s leading attorney in the area ofnational security clearance matters and helps both Active Duty Military and Civilian Contractors and Employees around the globe.

    This case involved a 33 yr old Applicant with a high school education. The SOR alleges that Applicant used cocaine

    and further alleges that Applicant falsified information on his EQUIP.The gov’t admitted 5 exhibits and the Applicant through his attorneyAlan Edmunds admitted 10 exhibits. Attorney Alan Edmunds also called one witness plus the Applicant.

    Attorney Edmunds presented very strong evidence that Applicant suffered from PTSD and that this impacted his behavior. The mental health issue of this prior military member was compelling. Another issue that Attorney Edmunds developed in the trial was the “whole person concept.”

    The judge concluded after review of the evidence and consideration of testimony and the comments of Attorney Alan Edmunds , ” that Applicant has mitigated drug involvement and personal conduct security concerns.”

    Alan Edmunds is an incredible attorney who is passionate about his clients case and presentation of evidence at trial. He is known as “The DOHA ATTORNEY” because he represents so many clients across the country at DOGHA Hearings. His staff of professionals also does,Responses to SOR, FOIA Requests, Security
    Clearance Appeals andMilitary Security Clearances. Call 800 481 2526 for immediate assistance with your case.

    You may also learn more by visiting www.nationalsecurityclearances.com

  • Personal Conduct

    JANUARY 20,2017
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    WOODLAND HILLS, CALIF
    GUIDELINE E – PERSONAL CONDUCT

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of another favorable decision following a formal Security Clearance Hearing involving allegations of drug use and falsification of a govt’ questionnaire. The case was litigated before an Administrative Law Judge. Attorney Ryan C. Nerney appeared on behalf of the Edmunds Law Firm.

    The case included testimony, exhibits and a signed Statement of Intent by applicant. The defense offered into evidence exhibits A-Q – which showed mitigation of the allegations. The applicant used marijuana last in 2012. He also testified that he no longer associates with the individuals in his past. In addition several of Applicants supervisors wrote strong letters of recommendation.

    The Edmunds Law Firm is this country’s leading provider of security clearance representation.Attorney Alan Edmunds is known as the DHA Lawyer and often referred to as “The Best Security Clearance Attorney.”

    Attorney Edmunds helpsActive Duty Military and Civilian Employees with security clearance allegations. Response to SOR Security Clearance Appeals, FOIA Requests and Security Clearance Hearings are a few of the services offered for clients across the country and around the globe. The Edmunds Law Firm has offices coast to coast. The Official DOHA web site reveals that Attorney Alan Edmunds has done over 600 Hearings in the last 5 years. He is a Former Judge Pro Tem and has received awards for his legal work.

    Call Alan Edmunds today with questions at 800-481-2526 or visit www.nationalsecurityclearances.com – our staff of experts is standing by for your call.

  • Financial Concerns

    JANUARY 20, 2017
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    GUIDELINE F: FINANCIAL CONCERNS
    WOODLAND HILLS, CA

    The Edmunds law Firm, this country’s leading law firm in national security clearance representation received another favorable decision following a Formal Hearing.The case involved a client who was 47 years old, unmarried with no children. She had an MBA and held a position of management for a defense contractor.

    Attorney Ryan Nerney appeared for the Firm. Mr. Nerney’s record of success extends coast to coast. At the Hearing he called four witnesses and introduced twenty exhibits. The case was a Guideline F – Financial Concern case where the Applicant had 14 debts totaling $115,000.00 including 2 tax liens. The Edmunds Law Firm has handled more Guideline F cases over the last 4 years than most other law firms according to the DOHA official web site.

    Attorney Alan Edmunds is the Sr Lawyer for the Firm and has a global reputation as being one of ” The Best Security Clearance Lawyers“. He has tried over 600 cases in the last 4 years and trains the law firm lawyers to be ” trial attorneys”. Mr. Edmunds has clients bothActive Duty Military, Contractors and Federal Employees around the world. Helping Active Duty with Military Security Clearance matters is important to Alan Edmunds who has made a career out of defending our men and woman in uniform with legal problems.

    We welcome your calls and email. Please call 800-481-2526 or email us with case details at aedmunds@alanedmunds.com. You can also visit us at our security clearance web sites www.keepyoursecurityclearance.com

  • Nigerian Applicant

    JANUARY 19, 2017
    SECURITY CLEARANCE VICTORY
    GUIDELINE B: FOREIGN INFLUENCE – NIGERIA
    ARLINGTON, VA

    Attorney Alan Edmunds received notification from the judge that he was making a “Summary Favorable Disposition” on a case involving an applicant who was from Nigeria. What was so special about this case is that the judge made his initial decision shortly after the Hearing was closed. Attorney Alan Edmunds admitted so much evidence and presented such compelling arguments that the judge stated,” Applicant mitigated security concerns raised in the SOR and met her heavy burden of persuasion …” the judge went on to say, ” the whole person factors present in this case mitigate the security concern raised by Applicant’s past actions…” In addition this case involved a woman who in the words of the judge,” she has a full-time job in the United States, while attending a prestigious U.S. university for her second post- doctorate degree.”

    Alan Edmunds is this country’s leading “Security Clearance Attorney’s,” who has tried more than 600 cases before Federal Agencies. His case work can be verified by gov’t web sites as well as his success in the courtroom. He helps clients around the globe with “Responses to SOR“, “Security Clearance Hearings“, “Security Clearance Appeals” and “SF 86” prep.

    The Edmunds Law Firm has offices in San Diego, Raleigh, and Jacksonville, Fla. The Firm attorneys help Active Duty Military, Contractors deployed around the globe as well as gov’t employees. Mr Edmunds has done military law for over 40 years. He helps Active Duty with Military Security Clearance’s. He is also often referred to as “The DOHA Lawyer“. Call 800 481 2526 for immediate assistance. You can also review case results at www.nationalsecurityclearances.com.

  • DUI Convictions

    JAN 12, 2017
    DEPT OF THE NAVY
    GUIDELINE G – ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION
    BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA

    The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision following a Formal Hearing in Bloomington, Indiana at the Naval Surface Warfare Center. The Hearing included allegations of alcohol abuse alleging 2 separate DUI convictions.

    The Edmunds Law Firm has been helping clients with Military Security Clearance cases for over 40 years. Attorney Alan Edmunds is this country’s leading Security Clearance Attorney appearing at Formal Hearing, Response to SOR, and Appeals of Security Clearances.

    Attorney Edmunds appeared for the Firm in this case. Attorney Edmunds traveled from the Firm’s West coast office. During the Hearing Attorney Edmunds called witnesses, offered into evidence documents and argued the case before the Administrative judge. Had the client lost this case he would have not only lost his clearance but also his job which he had for over ten years.

    The President, Personnel Security Appeals Board stated, “AS a result of its review, the PSAB will direct the Dod CAF to reinstate your eligibility for access to classified information…”

    Attorney Alan Edmunds is the Sr. Attorney and founder of the Firm. He is often considered by many as “The Best Security Clearance Lawyer” in the country. His record of success appears on the official gov’t web site at DOHA. He has over 600 hearings just in the last 4 years. If you need help call 800 481 2526 and trust your career to one of the most experienced law firms in the country. You can also visit us at www.nationalsecurityclearances.com – “Experience makes the Difference.”

  • Financial Concerns

    JAN 6, 2017
    GUDIELING F: FINANCIAL CONCERNS
    NEW LONDON, CT

    The Edmunds Law Firm, the leading nationally known law firm in the area of national security clearance cases, received another favorable decision following trial in a case that was litigated in New London, Ct. The Applicant had an SOR that alleged 10 separate debts.

    Attorney Ryan Nerney for the Firm appeared at trial. He has extensive trial experience across the country and litigated this case. Numerous documents were admitted showing mitigation of certain debts and testimony was taken.

    The case was made more complex because there were also allegations concerning unpaid child support and Federal taxes.

    The Edmunds Law Firm helps clients with , Response to SOR, SF 86 prep and Security Clearance Appeals. Call 800 481 2526 to speak with an attorney. Your career is important – let our experience and national reputation for success help you and your family through difficult times. You can also view case results on the law firm web sites nationalsecurityclearances.com.

Favorable Decisions 2016

Favorable Decisions 2015

Favorable Decisions Archive

Favorable Decisions 2016

Favorable Decisions 2015

  • Guideline F – Financial Considerations

    Arlington VA

    The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable decision on a Department of Hearing and Appeals Hearing that was tried by Attorney Alan Edmunds for the Firm. This case involved a Contractor who had a foreclosure and owed over $83,000.00. Mr. Edmunds introduced evidence showing that the concerns of the gov’t were mitigated, and the Contractor’s Security Clearance was granted.

  • Guideline F – Financial Considerations

    Arlington VA

    The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable decision on an Administrative Security Clearance Hearing that was tried by Attorney Alan Edmunds for the Firm. This case involved a Government Contractor who’s security clearance was being denied for debts he owed in the amount of over $41,000.00. Mr. Edmunds introduced evidence showing that the concerns of the gov’t were mitigated, therefore the Government Contractor’s Security Clearance was reinstated.

  • DOHA Guideline B – Foreign Influence

    The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable decision on an Administrative Security Clearance Hearing. This case involved a Government Employee’s husband who applied for a Iranian Passport and Identification. The case was very aggressively fought by the government attorney. The Edmunds Law Firm presented evidence to the Government that mitigated any concerns the Government had. The Government Employee’s security clearance was favorably adjudicated and she was able to continue her career.

  • Department of Homeland Security

    Guidelines E (Personal Conduct) and J (Criminal Conduct)

    The Department of Homeland Security issued a Notice of Intent to Deny Employment to a potential employee, due to allegations pertaining to falsifying information and omitting material on his SF 86. The Edmunds Law Firm provided a written response to their allegations and successfully mitigated any concerns they had. The written response by The Edmunds Law Firm enabled the potential employee to continue with the hiring process with the Department of Homeland Security.

  • Department of Energy – Written Response

    Guideline E (personal conduct); Guideline G (alcohol Consumption); Guideline J (criminal

    “A Summary of Security Concerns was issued to a Department of Energy employee in regards to Personal Conduct, Alcohol Consumption and Criminal Conduct issues. There were over 10 accusations that were required to be mitigated. A written response was prepared by the Edmunds Law Firm and submitted to the Department of Energy for consideration. All concerns were favorably mitigated through a written response by Attorney Edmunds and his staff. Applicant’s security clearance was reinstated.”

  • Guidelines: F – Financial Considerations

    City/Country: South Korea

    “An Army Sergeant stationed in South Korea received a Statement of Reasons for Financial Indebtedness. Applicant’s security clearance was in the process of being revoked, which would have ended his military career. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concern by preparing a professionally written response, which mitigated all the Government’s concerns listed on the statement of reasons. As a result, the Army Sergeant’s security clearance was re-instated and he was able to continue with his military career.”

  • Guideline H – Illegal Drug Use

    Arlington VA

    The Edmunds Law Firm received Notice of a favorable decision on an Administrative Security Clearance Hearing that was tried by Attorney Alan Edmunds for the Firm. This case involved a woman who was denied for using marijuana on 2 occasions, and also used marijuana while possessing a security clearance.

    The case was very aggressively fought by the government attorney. Mr. Edmunds introduced evidence and called witnesses showing that the concerns of the gov’t were mitigated. This was a case that Mr. Edmunds was proud to have been involved with because of the outstanding work performance of his client and her sincere testimony in court.

  • DOHA

    Guidelines E and J

    The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision on a DOHA Security Clearance hearing on September 29, 2014. The case involved Criminal Conduct due to several traffic violations and Personal Conduct issues. Attorney Edmunds presented evidence to the Judge in mitigation and took oral testimony. The judge found all allegations had been mitigated and the applicant’s security clearance was granted.

  • DOHA

    Guidelines E, K, and M

    The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision on a DOHA Security Clearance hearing on September 29, 2014. The case involved Improper Handling of Protected Information; Improper use of Information Technology and Personal Conduct issues. Attorney Edmunds presented evidence to the Judge in mitigation and took oral testimony. The judge found all allegations had been mitigated and the applicant’s security clearance was granted.

  • DODCAF

    Guidelines J, K, and M

    The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision on a Response to Statement of Reasons from Department of Defense, Consolidated Adjudications Facility on August 22, 2014. The case involved Improper Handling of Protected Information; Improper use of Information Technology and Criminal Conduct issues. The Edmunds Law Firm mitigated the Government’s Concern’s on all issues. Quote from the client “thank you for saving my career.”

  • Guideline J Criminal Conduct & Guideline E Dishonesty

    Arlington, VA

    The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision on a DOHA Security Case on Aug 8,2014. The case involved criminal conduct of Assault and violating a Protective Order. Attorney Edmunds presented evidence in mitigation and took oral testimony. The judge found all allegations had been mitigated and the applicant was allowed to keep his clearance.

    Mr. Edmunds travels the globe for his clients and uses over 30 years of experience and knowledge to save careers. Call the office at 800-481-2526 for assistance with your case. Your career is important! Visit our websites at nationalsecurityclearances.com

  • Favorable Decision

    Arlington, VA
    Guideline E (Personal Conduct) & Guideline H (Drug Involvement)

    Attorney Alan Edmunds received a favorable decision involving Drug Involvement and Personal Conduct for his client who works for the DoD CAF Industry Division. The client was involved with drugs while holding a Security Clearance. Mr. Edmunds successfully mitigated the governments concerns and actions. If you would like Attorney Alan Edmunds to help you, please call 800-481-2526.

  • Favorable Decision

    Arlington, VA
    Guideline B (Foreign Influence)

    Attorney Alan Edmunds received a favorable decision involving foreign influence and foreign preference for his client who is stationed in Kuwait. This client had numerous relatives living and working in Kuwait and other countries. Mr. Edmunds successfully rebutted the presumptions and mitigated the Government’s actions. If you would like Attorney Alan Edmunds to help you, please call 800-481-2526.

  • DOD CAF

    Guideline F (Financial Considerations)

    The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable security clearance decision for a Response to the Statement of Reasons. Client had two bankruptcies and various unpaid accounts, however, through responding to the Statement of Reasons and supportive documentation, The Edmunds Law Firm mitigated the governments concerns and the client was able to retain their clearance and continue their career before retirement. If you would like Attorney Alan Edmunds to help you, please call 800-481-2526.

  • DOD CAF- Navy Division

    Guideline A (Allegiance to the U.S.), Guideline E (Personal Conduct), Guideline J (Criminal Conduct)

    On April 30, 2014 The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable security clearance decision for a Response to the Statement of Reasons. Through the Response to the Statement of Reasons and supportive documentation, The Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the governments concerns and the client was able to continue their career. If you would like Attorney Alan Edmunds to help you, please call 800-481-2526.

  • DODCAF Navy Division

    February 18, 2014
    Guideline B (Foreign Influence)

    On February 18, 2014, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination as a result of the Response to Statement of Reasons (SOR) package prepared on behalf of the Applicant. This case pertained to Guideline B, Foreign Influence. The Applicant, had inquired about executing a lateral move package from the United States Marine Corps, to the Australian Army. Through the written Response to SOR package, and supportive documentation, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concerns and the SOR was withdrawn. The Applicant was able retain their clearance, and move forward with their career.

  • DODCAF Army Division

    February 11, 2014
    Guideline F (Financial Considerations)

    On February 11, 2014, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination as a result of the Response to Statement of Reasons (SOR) package prepared on behalf of the Applicant. This case pertained to Guideline F, Financial Considerations. The Applicant, had accumulated over $30,000.00 in debt. Through the written Response to SOR package, and supportive documentation, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concerns and the SOR was withdrawn. The Applicant was able retain their clearance, and move forward with their career.

  • DOHA

    Guideline F

    On December 13, 2013, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination as a result of the Response to Statement of Reasons (SOR) package prepared on behalf of the Applicant. This case pertained to Guideline F, Financial Considerations. The Applicant, had accumulated debt totalling more than $14,277.00, but through the written Response to SOR package, and supportive documentation, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concerns and the Applicant was able retain their clearance, and move forward with their career.

  • DODCAF

    Guideline F

    On October 15, 2013, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination as a result of the Response to Statement of Reasons (SOR) package prepared on behalf of the Applicant. This case pertained to Guideline F, Financial Considerations. The Applicant, had numerous account in collections totalling more than $30,000. Through the written Response to SOR package, and supportive documentation, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concerns and the Applicant was able retain their clearance, and move forward with their career.

  • DODCAF

    Guideline F

    On October 8, 2013, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination as a result of the Response to Statement of Reasons (SOR) package prepared on behalf of the Applicant. This case pertained to Guideline F, Financial Considerations. The Applicant, had accumulated debt totalling more than $26,000.00, but through the written Response to SOR package, and supportive documentation, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concerns and the Applicant was able retain their clearance, and move forward with their career.

  • Department of Defense (ARMY Division)

    Guideline J

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of another favorable security clearance determination as a result of the written Response to Statement of Reasons, prepared by the Edmunds Law Firm on behalf of the Applicant. This case in particular involved Guideline J, Criminal Conduct. Applicant was issued a Statement of Reasons outlining concerns regarding his accusations of wire fraud, larceny of government funds, travel pay fraud, and conspiracy, which resulted in total loss value to the government of over $296,000.00. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared the written Response to the Statement of Reasons and provided essential documentation to support Applicant’s rebuttal. The government’s concerns regarding Applicant’s allegations of criminal conduct was successfully mitigated through the written Response only and Applicant’s security clearance was successfully retained.

  • DODCAF

    Guideline E

    On September 24, 2013, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination as a result of the Response to Statement of Reasons (SOR) package prepared on behalf of the Applicant. The case pertained to Guideline E, Personal Conduct. The Applicant was subject of an Article 15 hearing, which he plead guilty to fraternization. Through the written Response to SOR package, and supportive documentation, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concern and the Applicant was able to retain their clearance, and continue their career as a distinguished pilot.

  • DOD (ARMY Division)

    Guideline G

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of yet another favorable security clearance determination as a result of a written Response to Statement of Reasons. This case in particular involved Guideline G, Alcohol Consumption. Applicant was a Chief Warrant Officer 4 and successfully completed The ASAP (Army Substance Abuse Program). Through both the written Response and supportive documentation, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concerns regarding Applicant’s past financial issues and the individual’s security clearance was successfully reinstated.

  • Department of Homeland Security

    Guideline G

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of another favorable security clearance determination as a result of one SEC hearing, and written Response to Statement of Reasons. This case in particular involved Guideline G, Alcohol Consumption. Applicant was involved in four alcohol related incidents. (Two of which were while operating a motor vehicle). Attorney Alan V. Edmunds appeared at the SEC hearing and was able to mitigate the government’s concerns regarding Applicant’s past alcohol related incidents and the individual’s security clearance was successfully granted.

  • DOHA: Hearing

    Guideline E

    The Edmunds law firm received notification of another favorable decision after representing the Applicant in a Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals hearing. The government’s concerns revolved around Guideline E for polygraph discrepancies, credit card fraud, and investigation discrepancies. Appearing on behalf of Applicant, Attorney Alan Edmunds of the Edmunds Law Firm mitigated all of the government’s concerns through testimony of Applicant and documented evidence. Applicant received a favorable decision by the Administrative Judge and is eligible for a security clearance.

  • DOHA: Response to Statement of Reasons

    Guideline F

    The government issued Applicant a Statement of Reasons for Guideline F, detailing a list of financial concerns. Applicant had serious financial debt including approximately $27,000 in credit card debt and over $50,000 in missed mortgage payments. Through the response to the Statement of Reasons, Attorney Corey Williams mitigated the government’s concern with Applicant’s financial debts by proving the debts were caused by factors largely outside of her control and by showing Applicant was willing and able to resolve each debt. The client received a favorable decision in her case from the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals and is eligible for a security clearance.

  • DODCAF: Response to Statement of Reasons

    Guideline F, Guideline I, Guideline G

    Applicant was deemed ineligible for security clearance under Guideline F, Guideline I, and Guideline G due to financial, criminal, and psychological concerns. Applicant was a former drug addict and alcoholic, was convicted of Assault with a Deadly Weapon, had serious financial debts, and was diagnosed with a mild form of Bi-Polar disorder. The government issued him a Statement of Reasons due to these concerns. Attorney Corey Williams of the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate every one of the government’s concerns with the client’s previous criminal, psychological and financial conditions through the response to the Statement of Reasons. Applicant received a favorable decision from the Department of Defense Consolidated Adjudications Facility, Defense Division, he is eligible for a security clearance, and he now has a job working with classified information.

  • DOHA

    Hearing was at Woodland Hills, CA.
    Guidelines B, C and E

    Government alleged foreign influence, foreign preference, and personal conduct concerns against our client. Our client had inherited property in Afghanistan from his parents. He had divested himself of most of the property, but some real estate remained in his name as it was entangled in land disputes in Afghanistan. Because of this, our client also had open bank accounts in Afghanistan. In addition, our client’s brother lived in Afghanistan and refused to return to the United States, and his son played for the Afghan national basketball team. Our client had also failed to list one bank account in Afghanistan.

    Attorneys Paula Phinney and Corey Williams appeared on behalf of Applicant at the hearing, and were able to convince the judge that Applicant had done everything possible to divest himself of his Afghan property, and that his bank accounts and remaining contacts in Afghanistan were a necessity in order to do so. Applicant’s son was an American citizen who was finishing his university studies in a local California college. Applicant’s son’s participation on the Afghan national basketball team was not a concern because the team was comprised of Afghan-Americans. The judge determined that Applicant had successfully mitigated the government’s concerns and issued a favorable security clearance decision for our client.

  • DOHA

    GUIDELINE F

    Woodland Hills, California

    On June 17, 2013, the Edmunds Law Firm was notified of a favorable security clearance adjudication. Attorney Julia Szafraniec represented the Applicant at the security clearance hearing before the Department of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA). The case involved financial considerations under Guideline F. The Applicant had six (6) previous bankruptcies dismissed in addition to other debts including the Applicant being late on mortgage payments. Attorney Szafraniec was able to successfully mitigate the government’s concerns through the testimony of the Applicant and a witness as well as through documentary evidence. Attorney Szafraniec refuted the government’s allegations and the Applicant’s security clearance will be reinstated.

  • Security Clearance

    Department of the Navy: Response to Statement of Reasons
    Guideline F

    Applicant, an honorably discharged Navy veteran and loyal United States Citizen, was issued a Statement of Reasons due to serious financial considerations including bankruptcy, past due payments, collections and judgments totaling in the tens of thousands of dollars. The Edmunds Law Firm, through a written response to the Statement of Reasons, mitigated the government’s concerns with Applicant’s financial considerations by proving the financial debts were caused by circumstances outside Applicant’s control. The favorable decision resulted in the Applicant’s security clearance being reinstated.

  • DOHA

    DOHA: Reapplication Brief
    Guidelines D and E

    Applicant was issued a Statement of Reasons for government’s concerns regarding his sexual behavior and personal conduct. For six years, Applicant viewed adult pornographic material on government computers while working for a government agency. When Applicant’s security clearance revocation was upheld after a hearing, attorney Alan Edmunds of the Edmund’s Law Firm successfully mitigated the government’s concerns in a reapplication brief. The favorable decision provided Applicant with Top Secret security clearance eligibility.

  • Military Upgrade

    Department of the Navy
    Washington, DC

    On May 28, 2013, the Edmunds Law firm was notified that the Applicant’s Characterization of Service Received was upgraded from “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions” to “General (Under Honorable Conditions).” Attorney Alan V. Edmunds of the Edmunds Law Firm represented the Applicant at the military upgrade hearing before the Department of the Navy. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate the Applicant’s previous circumstances while simultaneously showing the Applicant’s behavior since the discharge warranted an upgrade of discharge under Honorable Conditions.

  • DOHA

    May 21, 2013
    Guideline F and Guideline E
    Atlanta, Georgia

    On May 21, 2013, the Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance adjudication. Attorney Alan V. Edmunds, the premier security clearance lawyer of the Edmunds Law Firm, represented the Applicant at the security clearance hearing before a DOHA Administrative Judge. The case involved Guideline F, Financial Considerations, and Guideline E, Personal Conduct. The Applicant had incurred a significant amount of debt of which the government alleged was unpaid. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate the government’s concerns by presenting evidence to refute the government’s allegations and through the Applicant’s testimony. The Applicant’s security clearance was reinstated just over three (3) months after the hearing concluded.

  • DOHA

    May 17, 2013
    Guidelines E and F
    Washington, DC

    On May 17, 2013, the Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance outcome after appearing personally before a DOHA Administrative Judge and Department Counsel. The government’s concerns involved Guideline E: Personal Conduct, and Guideline F: Financial Concerns. The client had significant financial debt in addition to personal conduct leading to the client being terminated from a Department of Defense contractor position. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concerns for both guidelines through the client’s testimony and the submission of relevant supportive documentation. The client received a favorable decision in the security clearance matter and the client’s security clearance was reinstated.

  • DOHA

    May 15, 2013
    Guideline F
    Norfolk, Virginia

    On May 15, 2013, the client informed the Edmunds Law Firm that his security clearance was re-instated. The client was issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) with sole focus on Guideline F: Financial Considerations. The client had significant debt including unpaid taxes and loss of revenue from rental property. In a hearing for the client, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s financial concerns resulting in the client’s security clearance being reinstated.

  • DOHA

    May 9, 2013
    Guideline B
    DOHA
    Arlington, Virginia

    On May 9, 2013, the Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance outcome after appearing personally before a DOHA Administrative Judge and Department Counsel. This case in particular involved Guideline B, Foreign Influence. The client in this matter was a retired Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army. The client’s spouse is a Russian native with family ties to Russia. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concerns through the client’s testimony, the submission of significant supportive documentation and witness testimony, which ultimately led to a favorable decision from the Administrative Judge. The client’s security clearance was reinstated and he/she was able to move forward in their career.

  • NSA

    May 7, 2013
    Guideline E, G and J
    Fort George G. Meade, Maryland

    On May 7, 2013, the Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance outcome after responding to the Statement of Reasons (SOR). Client was issued a SOR with the government indicating a violation of Guidelines E, G, and J. After being accused of excessive use of alcohol dating back to when the client was a minor, driving while intoxicated, and claiming the client was someone who lacked judgment and candor, the decision to deny the client’s access was overturned without the need of a formal hearing. The client now has the opportunity to continue the security clearance process.

  • DCA

    May 6, 2013
    Guideline E and Guideline F

    On May 6, 2013, the Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision after the submission of a written Response to Statement of Reasons, which was prepared on behalf of the Applicant. Guideline E, Personal Conduct, and Guideline F, Financial Considerations, were of issue in the particular case. The Applicant had incurred a significant amount of debt with multiple tax liens filed against him/her, of which he/she failed to disclose while filling out the security clearance application. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted the written Response to the Statement of Reasons along with supportive documentation. We were able to successfully mitigate the government’s concerns through only the written response and the Applicant’s security clearance was reinstated.

  • Department of the Army

    May 21, 2013
    Guideline F
    Fort George G. Meade, Maryland

    On May 21, 2013, the client informed the Edmunds Law Firm that he was granted provisional security clearance pending the ability to keep up with IRS payments. The Statement of Reasons (SOR) stated that the client had financial debts well exceeding $100,000. Without the need for a formal hearing, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to submit a response to the SOR mitigating the government’s financial concerns under Guideline F, allowing for a favorable decision in the client’s security clearance matter.

  • DoDCAF

    Industry Division B
    March 25, 2013
    Guideline F

    On March 25, 2013, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification from our client that their security clearance had been reinstated as a result of the response to Interrogatories prepared by The Edmunds Law Firm. This case in particular involved Guideline F, Financial Considerations and was a direct result of a delinquent mortgage. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the governments concerns through the written response and supportive documentation. The Applicant’s access was restored and he was able to move forward in his career.

  • FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE DECISION

    DOHA: ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA
    MARCH 11, 2013

    On March 11, 2013, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of another favorable security clearance decision after representing the Applicant in front of a DOHA Administrative Judge. This case in particular involved Guideline E, Personal Conduct. Personal Conduct can raise question on a person’s reliability, trustworthiness and ability to protect classified information. After presenting evidence and making arguments, Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate the Government’s allegations and the Applicant’s Security Clearance was reinstated.

  • FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE DETERMINATION

    February 2013
    Financial

    February 2013 – Financial: client, an aircraft technician and pilot, faced numerous financial concerns, including one debt owed over $30,000 that he was unable to pay. Client was receiving unemployment income of only $1700 each month and had an extremely tight budget, having to balance his present living expenses with paying off some of the smaller debts owed. Because of his limited income, he could not make payments on the large $30,000 debt. He could not find work that would enable him to pay off these debts because his clearance had been suspended, although he had several job prospects willing to sponsor him. With our help, he was able to demonstrate at a DOHA hearing that he acted reasonably to try and pay off his debts given his very limited financial means. The judge found for Applicant, and his security clearance was reinstated.

  • FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE DETERMINATION

    February 2013
    Drug Use and Personal Conduct

    February 2013 – Drug Use and Personal Conduct: client, an engineer, used marijuana intermittently while in high school and college. Shortly after graduation, he was hired by a Department of Energy contractor. He declared his prior marijuana use when applying for employment with a Department of Energy contractor. However, he failed to disclose one instance of marijuana use which occurred while he was already working for the government and holding a clearance. Our client voluntarily disclosed this information to his security officer, but the government was concerned that this failure to disclose constituted a lie and that he used marijuana while working on classified material. After a hearing on the matter, our client was able to mitigate the government’s concerns and his clearance was reinstated.

  • FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE DETERMINATION

    February 2013
    Statement of Reasons (SOR)

    February 2013 – Client was issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) for Foreign Influence, Sexual Conduct, Personal Conduct, and Criminal Conduct due to multiple (over 100) liaisons with prostitutes and one-night stands with women he met at bars and clubs while stationed abroad. We responded to the SOR. The government requested that the client take a polygraph, after which his clearance was reinstated with conditions.

  • FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE VICTORY

    AFCAF
    December 18, 2012
    Guideline G – Alcohol Consumption

    On December 18, 2012, the Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable determination after submission of a written Response to Statement of Reasons. In this case, Guideline G, Alcohol Consumption, was of concern. Applicant had a history of alcohol abuse, which included mandatory participation in both inpatient and outpatient alcohol related counseling. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written Response to the Statement of Reasons along with supportive documentation to the Agency and was able to mitigate the government’s concerns successfully.

  • SOR

    PERU, INDIANA
    ALCOHOL & FINANCIAL

    On December 12, 2012 The Edmunds Law Firm, a global leader in national security clearance representation, received another favorable decision from a written Response to SOR. The case involved alcohol incidents and financial issues. Attorney Edmunds, one of this countries leading security clearance attorneys was able to mitigate all concerns and the clearance was granted without a Formal Hearing. Another career saved!

    Attorney Edmunds submitted a written Response with numerous exhibits and a compelling argument that was accepted by the government. The client saved money and a career. The Edmunds Law Firm can help you as well – call 800 481 2526

  • Successful CIA Security Clearance Appeal

    CHANTILLY, VIRGINIA
    November 26, 2012

    The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision on a national security clearance appeal from the CIA. The case involved personal conduct and alleged violations of handling classified material. Attorney Edmunds, who represents clients around the world in national security clearance matters, argued this case. Evidence was admitted, testimony taken and argument made by Attorney Edmunds. The Agency concluded that Attorney Edmunds had successfully mitigated the government concerns and access was granted and the lower decision reversed. Another career was saved!

  • DOHA

    FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE DECISION
    November 6, 2012
    Guideline H and Guideline E

    On November 6, 2012, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable decision after appearing as counsel for Applicant in Woodland Hills, California. This particular case involved Guideline H, Drug Involvement and Guideline E, Personal Conduct. The Applicant, in this case, experimented with illegal drugs, marijuana, after being issued a Top Secret Security Clearance. Guideline H states that the use of illegal drugs can raise question about a person reliability and trustworthiness. Guideline E pairs with Guideline H in this case which questions the Applicant’s judgment and lack of willingness to follow rules. This can also raise question about a person’s reliability, trustworthiness and ability to protect classified information. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the governments concerns through oral testimony and the submission of supportive documentation and were able to prove the Applicant to be a reliable and trustworthy person.

  • Favorable Security Clearance Determination DOHA

    Canyon Lake, CA
    Favorable Security Clearance Determination DOHA
    Guideline F

    On October 30, 2012, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination under Guideline F – Financial Considerations. The Government alleged concerns that Applicant was financially overextended and at risk of having to engage in illegal acts to generate funds. After a thorough review of written response, evidence submitted, and oral argument by The Edmunds Law Firm, as well as positive efforts by the Applicant to resolve any financial issues, the Government found the Applicant to be honest, responsible, and making efforts to resolve their financial situation. Applicant’s security clearance was successfully reinstated and was able to move forward in their career.

  • FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE

    Guideline B

    On October 9, 2012, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination after representing the Applicant at a personal appearance before a DOHA Administrative Law Judge. This case in particular involved Guideline B, Foreign Influence.

  • AFCAF

    Guideline F

    On October 3, 2012, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination as a result of the Response to Statement of Reasons (SOR) package prepared on behalf of the Applicant. This case pertained to Guideline F, Financial Considerations. The Applicant, who owned several rental properties, was greatly affected by the housing market crash and was forced to foreclose on several of the properties, in addition to an accumulation of debts. Through the written Response to SOR package, and supportive documentation, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concerns and the Applicant was able to move forward in their career.

  • FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE DECISION AFCAF

    Guideline B and Guideline C

    On October 1, 2012, the Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision after submission of a written Response to Statement of Reasons, prepared on behalf of the Applicant. Guidelines B and C were of issue in this case. After retiring from the Air Force, Applicant, a United States citizen, moved to a foreign country and obtained foreign citizenship with this country, only to return to the United States a few years later. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to successfully mitigate the government’s concerns through the written Response. Six (6) days after the AFCAF received the written Response to Statement of Reasons package, the Applicant’s security clearance was reinstated and was able to return to work the following day.

  • FAVORABLE DECISION AFCAF

    Guideline F

    On September 20, 2012, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification a favorable decision as a result of a written response to a Statement of Reasons. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted the written response to Statement of Reasons to the AFCAF on behalf of their client. The Applicant in this matter had accumulated a significant amount of debt after becoming unemployed. Altogether, the alleged amount owed calculated to be over $165,000.00. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the Financial Concerns through their written response and supportive documentation and the Applicant was able to move forward in their career.

  • Favorable Security Clearance Determination

    New Jersey
    Favorable Security Clearance Determination
    Guidelines E, F, G, and J

    On August 27, 2012, the Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision under Guideline F-Financial Considerations, Guideline E-Personal Conduct, Guideline G-Alcohol Consumption, and Guideline J- Criminal Conduct. Applicant was charged with counts of Simple Assault, DUI, Delinquent Debt, and Reckless Driving which created concern for the Government. The Edmunds Law Firm represented the Applicant in a formal hearing before DOHA. The Hearing took place in June of 2012 in Virginia on behalf of the applicant in which the Firm was able to fully mitigate all of the Government’s concerns. The Applicant’s clearance was quickly reinstated.

  • Favorable Security Clearance Determination

    Florida
    Favorable Security Clearance Determination
    Guideline E, F, and J

    On July 25, 2012 the Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision under Guideline E-Personal Conduct, Guideline F-Financial Considerations, and Guideline J-Criminal Conduct. The Applicant was charged with several counts of Battery, Fraud, and Contempt of Court, and as a result, the Government became concerned about his judgment, dishonesty, and unwillingness to comply with laws and revoked his clearance. The Edmunds Law Firm represented the Applicant in a Formal Hearing before DOHA. The hearing took place in March of 2012 in Florida. Through oral argument on behalf of the Applicant and evidence submitted, the firm was able to successfully mitigate all of the Government’s security concerns. The original decision was reversed and the Applicant was granted his clearance.

  • Favorable Security Clearance Determination

    San Diego
    Favorable Security Clearance Determination
    Guideline F-Financial Concerns

    On July 25, 2012, The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable security clearance determination. The firm represented the Applicant in a formal hearing before an Administrative Judge in Arlington, Virginia in May of 2012. The government expressed concerns that the Applicant was no longer responsible and trustworthy, as she allegedly had nine delinquencies on her credit report while filing for Bankruptcy. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove the Applicant was trustworthy, reliable and working towards resolving all financial problems. The firm was successful in mitigating all concerns and the Applicant’s clearance was reissued.

  • Favorable Decision

    Guidelines J-Criminal Conduct and H-Drug Involvement

    The Edmunds Law Firm recieved notice of a favorable decision on April 24, 2012. The firm represented an Applicant whose case was heard in California before an Administrative Judge in March 2012. The Applicant was a young soldier who was undergoing standard security processing and his security cleareance was revoked after he admitted to using illegal drugs while on active duty and while holding a cleareance. The Applicant was addicted to several illegal substances including heroin and cocaine and had purchased them illegally while on duty out of the counrty and had brought the drugs home. The firm was able to mitigate the concerns of the Government through oral argument and the presentation of many exhibits to the Judge. The favorable decision was announced less than two months after the hearing.

  • Favorable Security Clearance Determination

    April 24, 2012

    On April 24, 2012, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the Department of Defense (DOD) on behalf of Applicant and attended a hearing on February 27, 2012. In this case, there were concerns pertaining to Guideline E – Personal Conduct and Guideline M – Use of Information Technology Systems. The Government alleged that Applicant was a concern to national security due to his resignation from a previous employer, as well as, misuse of information technology. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the governments concerns and prove that Applicant was trustworthy, reliable, and not a risk to national security. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted a written response, attended Applicant’s hearing and Applicant was found eligible for his security clearance!

  • Decision to Revoke Reversed Despite Multiple DUI Charges

    April 16, 2012

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision on April 16, 2012. The Applicant in this matter had his clearance revoked under Guideline J-Criminal Conduct. The Government became doubtful of his good judgment and reliability due to several DUI’s he had been charged with over the past ten years. The Edmunds Law Firm represented the Applicant in a hearing before an Administrative Judge in Woodland Hills, California in October 2011. The firm was able to fully mitigate the concerns of the Government through their response to the SOR and oral argument on behalf of the Applicant at the hearing.

  • Favorable Decision

    Guideline H

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of another favorable security clearance outcome on April 11, 2012. The Applicant is a Government contractor who admitted to past drug use during standard security processing. She admitted to frequent drug use when she was in High School. As such, the Government became concerned as to the Applicant’s trustworthiness, good judgment and reliability. The Applicant was issued a Notice of Proposed Removal from the Department of Homeland Security. With her clearance and job on the line, she contacted the Edmunds Law Firm. The firm prepared a written response to the Notice containing mitigating factors and supporting exhibits. Upon review of the response, the Government reversed their original decision to remove the Applicant and she was able to keep her clearance and her position.

  • Clearance Granted Despite Criminal Conduct Allegations

    March 29, 2012

    On March 29, 2012 the Edmunds Law Firm received notice of yet another favorable decision. The firm was hired to prepare and submit a written response to the Applicant’s Government-issued SOR. The main allegation against the Applicant was a theft charge that showed up on his record during standard security processing. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the Government’s concerns through the response alone. The Government quickly reversed the original decision and reinstated the Applicant’s clearance.

  • Guideline E Decision to Revoke Overturned

    March 27, 2012

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision under Guideline E-personal Conduct on March 27, 2012. The Applicant had allegedly misused classified information and falsified information on her Government forms. This case was heard before an Administrative Judge in Chantilly, Virginia on October, 2011. The Edmunds Law Firm offered several mitigating factors through exhibits submitted and oral argument on behalf of the Applicant during the hearing. The firm was successful in mitigation and the Applicant was able to keep her clearance and most importantly, her job.

  • Favorable Decision Despite Drug Allegations

    March 16, 2012

    On March 16, 2012 The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable security clearance determination. The firm represented the Applicant in a formal hearing before an Administrative Judge in Tampa, Florida. The government alleged the Applicant’s abuse of prescription medication including Xanax, Vicoden and several others, were a concern to national security. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove the Applicant was trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. The firm was successful in mitigating all concerns and the Applicant’s clearance was reissued.

  • Favorable Decision Guideline F-Financial Considerations

    Guideline F-Financial Considerations

    On March 5, 2012 the Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision under Guideline F-Financial Considerations. The Applicant was issued five separate tax warrants from the State of Oklahoma and as a result, the Government became concerned about his trustworthiness and revoked his clearance. The Edmunds Law Firm represented the Applicant in a formal hearing before DOHA. The hearing took place in October of 2011 in Oklahoma. Through oral argument on behalf of the Applicant and evidence submitted, the firm was able to successfully mitigate all of the Government’s security concerns. The original decision was reversed and the Applicant was granted his clearance.

  • Favorable Decision

    Guideline E

    The Edmund’s Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision under Guideline E-Personal Conduct on February 28, 2012. The Applicant’s clearance was revoked when the Government expressed concerns due to multiple safety and traffic violations that the Applicant had been charged with. He had been issued over ten separate citations for speeding and/or safety violations in the past four years. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared a written response to the Government-issued SOR on behalf of the Applicant. The firm went on to represent the Applicant in a hearing in El Paso, Texas before an Administrative Judge. The firm was successful in mitigating all of the Government’s concerns and the Applicant was granted his clearance.

  • Clearance Granted Despite Alleged Time Card Fraud

    February 23, 2012

    On February 23, 2012 the Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision under guideline E-Personal Conduct. The Applicant was employed by a Government consulting firm and had been accused of time card fraud. He was issued a denial letter along with a Statement of Reasons from the NSA. The Government was concerned about his trustworthiness and commitment to preserving classified information. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared a written response to the NSA on behalf of the applicant. The response addressed each allegation in the SOR. Through the response alone, the Edmunds Law Firm was successful in mitigating the Government’s concerns. Clearance was granted.

  • Clearance Granted, No Hearing Necessary

    February 3, 2012

    On February 3, 2012 the Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision. The Applicant in this case was issued an SOR with several allegations of Drug Involvement, Criminal Conduct, Personal Conduct and Alcohol Consumption. The Applicant failed to disclose incidents from his teenage years and charges against him that had been dropped. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared a written response to the Government’s allegations on behalf of the Applicant. In the response, the firm addressed each allegation, stating that they were far in the Applicant’s past and were unlikely to ever happen again. The firm submitted multiple exhibits in support of the response and was able to mitigate the Government’s concerns. The Applicant’s clearance was granted.

  • Personal & Criminal Conduct Decision Reversed

    February 3, 2012

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision on February 3, 2012. The Applicant’s clearance was revoked after the Government discovered multiple traffic citations from several different states on the Applicants record which he failed to disclose. As a result, his clearance was removed and he was issued an SOR. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the SOR on behalf of the applicant. Within the response the firm laid out numerous mitigating factors along with several exhibits in support of the response. The Edmunds Law Firm succeeded in mitigating all of the Government’s concerns and the Applicant’s clearance was reinstated without the need for a hearing.

  • Psychological Conditions Favorable Decision

    February 2, 2012

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision on February 2, 2012. The Applicant in this matter had his clearance revoked due to allegations of Psychological Conditions. The Applicant was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder which created security concerns for the Government. The Edmunds Law Firm represented the Applicant in a hearing before an Administrative Judge in June, 2011. At the hearing the Edmunds Law Firm submitted several exhibits and provided oral argument on behalf of the applicant. The firm was able to fully mitigate the Government’s concerns and the Applicant’s clearance was reinstated.

  • Foreign Influence Favorable Decision

    January 25, 2012

    On January 25, 2012 the Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision under Guideline B-Foreign Influence and Guideline J-Criminal Conduct. The Applicant had allegedly came into the United States illegally and obtained a fake social security number. He also had let him family members who are not citizens of the U.S. use his mailing address and stay at his home on several occasions. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to successfully defend the Applicant in a hearing before an Administrative Judge. The firm presented several mitigating factors including naturalized citizenship and the length of time that had passed since his entry into the U.S. The Applicant’s request for his clearance to be reinstated was granted.

  • Guidelines F & E Favorable Decision

    January 23, 2012

    On January 23, 2012 the Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision under Guideline F-Financial Considerations and Guideline E-Personal Conduct. The Applicant failed to disclose details of a DUI he was charged with during security processing. He also had several large debts listed on his credit report which created concern for the Government in terms of his trustworthiness. the government revoked his clearance and issued an SOR. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared a written response to the SOR on behalf of the applicant in which the Firm was able to fully mitigate all of the Government’s concerns. The Applicant’s clearance was quickly reinstated.

  • Drug Involvement Favorable Decision

    January 19, 2012

    On January 19, 2012 the Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision under Guideline H-Drug Involvement, and Guideline J-Criminal Conduct. The Applicant received a statement of reasons alleging that he used marijuana several times. Because of this alleged drug use, the Government became concerned that the Applicant had poor judgment and was not trustworthy. The Edmunds Law Firm represented the Applicant in a formal hearing at which the Firm presented exhibits and provided oral argument on behalf of the applicant. The Firm was able to mitigate the Government’s concerns by proving that the Applicant was in fact trustworthy and reliable because the behavior was so infrequent, happened so long ago and would not ever happen again. The original decision to revoke the Applicant’s clearance was overturned.

  • Favorable Decision under Guideline F-Financial Considerations

    January 9, 2012

    On January 9, 2012 the Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision under Guideline F-Financial Considerations. The Applicant’s security clearance was revoked and he was issued an SOR. The Government expressed concerns that the Applicant was no longer reliable and trustworthy, as he allegedly had three delinquencies on his credit report totally nearly $60,000.00. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared a written response to the Government on behalf of the applicant and also represented him in a hearing before an Administrative Judge. The Edmunds Law Firm prevailed in mitigating the Government’s concerns through exhibits submitted and oral argument on behalf of the Applicant. The original decision to revoke his clearance was overturned.

  • Favorable Guideline

    J and Guideline D Decision

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision on December 29, 2011. The Applicant’s clearance was revoked due to security concerns under Guideline J- Criminal Conduct and Guideline D-Sexual Behavior. During a polygraph exam conducted by the Government, the applicant admitted to viewing child pornography on multiple occasions. This created security concerns for the Government resulting in revocation of clearance and issuance of an SOR. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared a written response to the SOR and represented the Applicant in a hearing before an Administrative Judge. Through the exhibits submitted to the Government and oral argument on behalf of the Applicant, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the Government’s concerns and the original decision was overturned.

  • Clearance Granted Despite Allegations of Criminal Conduct

    December 27, 2011

    On December 27, 2011 the Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a recent victory. An applicant who was facing allegations of falsely filling out time sheets for his job and illegally downloading music and movies off the internet while at work had his security clearance revoked. His clearance, however, was reinstated shortly after retaining the Edmunds Law Firm for legal services. The applicant was issued an SOR which the firm responded to on behalf of said applicant. The written response to the Government mitigated all of their security concerns and the applicant’s clearance was reinstated without the need for a formal hearing.

  • Foreign Influence Decision Overturned

    December 16, 2011

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a recent victory on December 16, 2011. The case involved a revocation of clearance based on Foreign Influence and Foreign Preference Guidelines. The applicant was originally from Israel and his family members were all residents of Israel. The applicant had traveled to Israel several times within a short time span and had been using an Israeli passport even though he was a naturalized U.S. citizen. The Edmunds Law Firm represented the applicant in a formal hearing where several witnesses gave testimony and oral argument on behalf of the applicant was heard. The Edmunds Law Firm was successful in mitigating all of the government’s security concerns and clearance was reinstated.

  • Guideline E and H Decision Overturned

    December 13, 2011

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notice that an applicant who was originally denied clearance had the decision reversed on December 13, 2011. The Government had originally revoked the applicant’s clearance under Guideline E for Personal Conduct and Guideline H for Drug Involvement. After receiving a written response to the SOR and the case being heard in front of an Administrative Judge in June of 2010, the Government decided that the applicant had not successfully mitigated all of the Government’s security concerns and the decision was upheld to revoke his clearance. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared a Request for Reapplication on behalf of the applicant in which the Firm explained how the applicant had made all the necessary changes to mitigate the Governments concerns. Upon review of the Request, the Government reversed their original decision and clearance was granted.

  • Favorable Decision – Guideline B, C, AND E

    Department: Department of Defense
    Location: Location: Carmel, Indiana
    Guideline(s): Foreign Influence–Guideline B
    Foreign Preference – Guideline C
    Personal Conduct – Guideline E

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision on December 10, 2011. The Applicant hired The Edmunds Law Firm to prepare and submit a written response to the Department of Defense. The Edmunds Law Firm was successful in mitigating the Government’s concern without the need for a hearing. In this case, there were concerns pertaining to Guideline B – Foreign Influence, Guideline C – Foreign Preference, and Guideline E – Personal Conduct. The Government alleged that Applicant was a concern to national security due to her having foreign contacts in China and Canada, her loyalty to the United States of America, as well as, her travels to China and Canada. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove that Applicant was trustworthy, reliable, and not a risk to national security. The Edmunds Law Firm prevailed in the written response alone and Applicant was found eligible for security clearance without the need for a hearing.

  • Clearance Granted Despite Judgments Entered Against Applicant:

    December 9, 2011

    On December 9, 2011 the Edmunds Law Firm received notice that a client’s security clearance was reinstated. The Government revoked his clearance and issued him a Statement of Reasons highlighting their concerns. The decision to revoke his clearance was due to the fact that his credit report reflected two judgments entered against him. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared a written response on behalf of the applicant. The Firm was able to mitigate the Government’s security concerns through the response and the applicant’s clearance was reinstated without have to go to a formal hearing.

    Guideline E Favorable Decision On November 23, 2011 the Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The firm prepared and submitted a written response to the Department of Defense on behalf of the Applicant. The Government had concerns regarding Applicant’s security clearance due to his alleged use of illegal substances after he was granted a clearance. The Edmunds Law Firm successfully mitigated these concerns under guideline E and the Applicant was granted his security clearance without having to go to a formal hearing.

  • Guideline I Favorable Decision

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notice of a favorable decision on December 9, 2011 under Guideline I for Psychological Conditions. The applicant was ordered to serve in the Middle East and in preparation he had received the Anthrax vaccine. The applicant suffered an adverse reaction which resulted in schizophrenia. The government had never received any details about the applicants condition accept that he in fact had a form of psychosis. The Edmunds Law Firm drafted a response to the Government outlining the applicant’s condition, treatment and willingness to comply with the Government’s requests. Upon review of this response, the applicant’s clearance was reinstated.

  • Criminal Conduct Decision Overturned

    November 17, 2011

    On November 17, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the National Security Agency on behalf of the Applicant. The firm was successful in mitigating the security concerns under Guideline J: Criminal Conduct, Guideline F: Financial Considerations and Guideline E: Personal Conduct, without the need for a hearing. The allegations against the Applicant pertained to $100,000 worth of stolen equipment from his former employer and failing to claim up to $10,000 worth of purchases on his state income taxes. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted a letter of appeal and supporting documentation to prove the Applicant had taken actions to rectify and mitigate those behaviors which resulted in the original denial decision. The firm prevailed and the Applicant was found eligible to maintain his security clearance.

  • Financial Considerations Guideline Decision

    November 10, 2011

    On November 10, 2011 the Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Government alleged concerns under Guideline F-Financial Concerns and issued a Statement of Reasons to Applicant that presented eight separate allegations of financial indebtedness. The bulk of the Applicant’s debts were student loans. The case was heard on September 14, 2011 by a DOHA Administrative Judge and the Edmunds Law Firm was successful in mitigating all concerns alleged by the Government in this case. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to prove that the Applicant’s financial debts were largely out of his control and he had been making good-faith attempts to pay off his debts. After examining documentary exhibits, witness testimonies, and oral argument, the Administrative Judge granted the Applicant’s security clearance.

  • Guideline H and G Decision

    November 10, 2011

    On November 10, 2011, the Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Applicant is an employee of a Defense Contractor and was denied his security clearance under Guidelines H and G for drug and alcohol issues. The drug and alcohol concerns related to the use of Marijuana and an alcohol-related assault and battery charge. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the Department of Defense on behalf of the Applicant. The hearing for this matter was held before a DOHA Administrative Judge on September 15, 2011. Based on the review of pleadings, submission of supporting documents, witness testimony, and oral argument on behalf of the Applicant, the DOHA Administrative Judge determined that the Applicant had met his burden of proof and granted him a security clearance.

  • Guideline B, D and E Decision

    November 7, 2011

    On November 7, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The hearing for this matter was held before a Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals Administrative Judge on October 19, 2010. In this case, there were concerns pertaining to Guideline B: Foreign Influence, Guideline D: Sexual Behavior and Guideline E: Personal Conduct. The government alleged the Applicant’s interactions and relationship with Lebanese military officers, misconduct relative to alcohol consumption, and sexual behavior were a concern to national security. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument, documentary evidence and provided witness testimony to prove the Applicant to be trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. Upon consideration of the evidence presented and oral argument, the Administrative Judge found it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant’s security clearance.

  • Guideline G Decision Granted

    November 7, 2011

    On November 7, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The hearing for this matter was held before the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals on Friday, March 11, 2011 in Santa Barbara, CA. In this case, there were concerns pertaining to Guideline G: Alcohol Consumption. The government alleged the Applicant was ineligible for clearance because he used intoxicants to excess and had four alcohol-related arrests. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove the Applicant as trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. Upon consideration of the testimonies given on the Applicant’s behalf, his willingness to stop drinking, additional evidence presented and oral argument, the government found it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant’s security clearance.

  • Drug Involvement Guideline

    On November 7, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The hearing for this matter was held before a Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals Administrative Judge on Tuesday, July 26, 2011 in Yuma, AZ. In this case, there were concerns pertaining to Guideline H: Drug Involvement and Guideline E: Personal Conduct. The government alleged the Applicant’s past use of methamphetamines— including a positive drug screening and arrest for Possession of a Controlled Substance— were a concern to national security. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove the Applicant was trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. Upon consideration of the evidence presented and oral argument, the Administrative Judge found it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant’s security clearance.

  • Reapplication Granted

    November 1, 2011

    On November 1, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals on behalf of the Applicant. The firm was successful in mitigating the security concerns under Guideline F: Financial Considerations and Guideline E: Personal Conduct, without the need for a hearing. The allegations against the Applicant pertained to over $60,000 in unpaid debt, numerous lines of open credit and falsified material provided on an Electronic Questionnaires for Investigations Processing (e-QIP). The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument— citing past case law— and documentary evidence to prove the Applicant had no potential for pressure, coercion, exploitation or duress. The firm prevailed and the Applicant was found eligible for reapplication for a security clearance.

  • West Bank, Israel Foreign Influence Case

    November 1, 2011

    The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals notified The Edmunds Law Firm of a favorable decision on November 1, 2011. After reviewing the information provided by The Edmunds Law Firm during the Applicant’s appeal, as well as all information that led to the original security decision, the government has overturned the original denial. The Applicant was previously denied based on Foreign Influence. The government rated the Applicant a high risk because of her close ties with family members who reside in Palestine, West Bank, Israel and Saudi Arabia; and who are citizens of Jordan. With the help of The Edmunds Law Firm, the Applicant renounced her Jordanian citizenship and was able to prove she was trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security at a hearing on Wednesday, August 3, 2011 in Arlington, VA.

  • Reapplication Granted After Previous Denial

    October 26, 2011

    The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals notified The Edmunds Law Firm that an Applicant’s request for reapplication was granted on October 26, 2011. After reviewing the information provided by The Edmunds Law Firm in the Applicant’s written response, as well as all documentary evidence and favorable recommendations, the agency decided to overturn the original 2010 denial. The Applicant was previously denied based on Guideline F: Financial Considerations. In 2010, DOHA first raised concerns under Guideline F due to ten delinquent accounts, totaling more than $18,000.00. Although the Applicant attempted to mitigate concerns through written response, a formal hearing and an appeal, the decision to deny the clearance remained. In September 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm was able to prove the Applicant to be trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security through written response alone. The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals granted the Applicant’s request for reapplication in October 2011.

  • Clearance Granted In Guideline J Matter

    October 20, 2011

    The Department of the Air Force notified The Edmunds Law Firm of a favorable decision on October 20, 2011. After reviewing the information provided by The Edmunds Law Firm in the Applicant’s written response, as well as all documentary evidence and favorable recommendations, the agency decided to overturn the original denial. The Applicant was previously denied based on Guideline D: Sexual Behavior and Guideline J: Criminal Conduct. A past false accusation of lewd and lascivious behavior with a child under 14-years old gave rise to these Guidelines. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to prove the Applicant to be trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security without the need for a hearing. The Department of the Air Force reinstated the Applicant’s security clearance without delay.

  • NSA Approval — Guideline G, J and E

    September 27, 2011

    On September 27, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The hearing for this matter was held before the National Security Agency’s Access Appeals Panel on Tuesday, September 13, 2011 in Annapolis Junction, MD. In this case, there were concerns pertaining to Guideline G— Alcohol Consumption, Guideline J— Criminal Conduct, and Guideline E— Personal Conduct. The government alleged the Applicant’s past alcohol consumption habits, multiple arrests, seemingly frequent intoxication and involvement in driving under the influence were a concern to national security. The Edmunds Law submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove the Applicant was trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. Upon consideration of the evidence presented and oral argument, the NSA Access Appeals Panel found it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant access to Sensitive Compartmented Information.

  • Alcohol, Psychological & Personal Conduct

    September 27, 2011

    On September 27, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The hearing for this matter was held before the National Security Agency’s Access Appeals Panel on Tuesday, September 13, 2011 in Annapolis Junction, MD. In this case, there were concerns pertaining to Guideline E— Personal Conduct, Guideline A— Alcohol Consumption and Guideline I— Psychological Conditions. The government alleged the Applicant’s past alcohol abuse was a concern to national security. The alcohol abuse resulted in numerous DUI arrests and convictions, an incident of near violence towards his spouse, tolerance for mass quantities of alcohol and reliance on alcohol for anxiety reduction and stress coping. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove the Applicant was trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. Upon consideration of the evidence presented and oral argument, the NSA Access Appeals Panel found it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant access to Sensitive Compartmented Information.

  • NSA Approved Clearance

    September 27, 2011

    On September 27, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The hearing for this matter was held before the National Security Agency’s Access Appeals Panel on Tuesday, September 13, 2011 in Annapolis Junction, MD. In this case, there were concerns pertaining to Guideline A— Alcohol Consumption, Guideline J— Criminal Conduct and Guideline E— Personal Conduct. The government alleged the Applicant’s past abuse of alcohol was a concern to national security. The alcohol abuse resulted in multiple instances of intoxication, a “gray-out” and a DUI arrest and conviction. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove the Applicant was trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. Upon consideration of the evidence presented and oral argument, the NSA Access Appeals Panel found it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant access to Sensitive Compartmented Information.

  • Foreign Preference & Influence

    September 26, 2011

    The Senior Adjudication Officer notified The Edmunds Law Firm of a favorable decision on September 26, 2011. After reviewing the information provided by The Edmunds Law Firm during the Applicant’s appeal, as well as all information that led to the original security decision, the government has overturned the original denial. The Applicant was previously denied based on Foreign Influence and Foreign Preference. The government rated the Applicant a high risk because of her close ties with family members in Egypt, her identification with that country and her frequent visits there. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to prove the Applicant to be trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security at a hearing on Wednesday, April 6, 2011 in Chantilly, VA. Accordingly, on future security applicants and forms, the Applicant may affirm that she never had a clearance denied.

  • Favorable Decision

    Department of Army & PR National Guard

    The Department of the Army and the Puerto Rico National Guard notified The Edmunds Law Firm of a favorable decision on September 20, 2011. After reviewing the information provided by The Edmunds Law Firm in the Applicant’s written response, as well as all documentary evidence and favorable recommendations, the agencies have overturned the original denial. The Applicant was previously denied based on Guideline F— Financial Considerations. His financial delinquencies included several student loans and unpaid phone bills. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to prove the Applicant to be trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security without the need for a hearing. Both the Department of the Army and Puerto Rico National Guard granted a Secret security clearance to the Applicant.

  • Clearance Approved

    Financial Matters

    September 20, 2011

    On September 20, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Department of the Army found the Applicant’s financial delinquencies to be a liability to national security. After a thorough review of written response and documentation submitted by The Edmunds Law Firm, as well as positive efforts by the Applicant to resolve any financial issues, the Department of the Army found the Applicant to be trustworthy and reliable. The Applicant was granted a Secret security clearance.

  • Foreign Influence

    Relatives in India

    September 6, 2011

    On September 6, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The hearing for this matter was held before a DOHA Administrative Judge on Thursday, June 2, 2011 in Chicago, IL. In this case, there were concerns pertaining to Guideline B – Foreign Influence. The government alleged the Applicant’s immediate family members and other relatives who are citizens of India were a concern to national security. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to provide the Applicant trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. Upon consideration of the evidence presented and oral argument, the Administrative Judge found it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant’s security clearance.

  • Doha Security Clearance

    Guideline E and H

    August 25, 2011

    On August 25, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The hearing for this matter was held before a DOHA Administrative Judge on Tuesday, July 26, 2011 in Arlington, VA. In this case, there were concerns pertaining to Guideline H – Drug Involvement and Guideline E— Personal Conduct. The government alleged the Applicant’s past use of marijuana and falsification of material facts were a concern to national security. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove the Applicant was trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. Upon consideration of the evidence presented and oral argument, the Administrative Judge found it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant’s security clearance.

  • Favorable Decision

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection Clearance

    August 9, 2011

    On August 9, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency on behalf of Applicant. The applicant sought the firm’s consultation and advisement regarding past clearance revocations. After a review of documents, the applicant proved to be trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. The applicant was granted Full Secret security clearance.

  • DOHA Security Clearance

    Guideline F

    August 4, 2011

    On August 4, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The hearing for this matter was held before a DOHA Administrative Judge on March 8, 2011 in Milwaukee, WI. In this case, there were concerns pertaining to Guideline F – Financial Considerations. The Government alleged the Applicant’s numerous unpaid debts were a concern to national security. The Applicant made good faith attempts to resolve outstanding debts and acted responsibly by making payments for the debts. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove the Applicant was trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. Upon consideration of the evidence presented and oral argument, the Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant’s security clearance.

  • Favorable Response

    Department of the Air Force

    August 2, 2011

    On August 2, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the Department of the Air Force on behalf of Applicant. The firm was successful in mitigating the security concerns under Guideline F— Financial Considerations, without the need for a hearing. The allegations against Applicant pertained to unpaid debts, numerous foreclosures and intentions to file for bankruptcy. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove that Applicant was trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. The firm prevailed and Applicant was found eligible to maintain his security clearance.

  • Security Clearance Granted From DOHA

    On July 28, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The hearing for this matter was held before a DOHA Administrative Judge on June 24th 2011 in Arlington, Virginia. In this case, there personal conduct concerns pertaining to Guideline E. The Government alleged that due to sexual misconduct, the Applicant was convicted by members at a special court-martial of various offences and was sentenced to be discharged with a Bad Conduct Discharge. The Applicant also submitted false statements in a warrants application of DC. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove that Applicant was trustworthy, reliable, and not a risk to national security. The Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant’s security clearance.

  • Favorable Response

    Security Clearance Determination Approved

    July 27, 2011

    On July 27, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written to response to the Defense Office of Hearing and Appeals and was successful in mitigating the Government’s concerns. Pending Applicant’s background investigation for a security clearance, the Government issued Interrogatories to Applicant inquiring into discrepant information Applicant had provided to the Government regarding his former employer and/or employment. The government also inquired into Applicant’s conduct involving illegal downloading of songs, video games, televisions shows, and movies. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted a written argument which sufficiently mitigated all security concerns. The Government determined that it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant’s security clearance.

  • Victory in SF86 Application

    SF86 Application

    July 25, 2011

    On July 25, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, on behalf of Applicant and was successful in mitigating the Government’s concern without the need for a hearing. In this case, there were dishonest conduct, criminal conduct, and employment misconduct concerns pertaining. The Government alleged that Applicant was a risk to national security due to omitting relevant information on the SF86, failure to divulge an arrest, issuing a bad check, and storing sexually oriented materials on a company computer. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove that Applicant was trustworthy, reliable, and not a risk to national security. The Edmunds Law Firm prevailed in the written response alone and Applicant was found eligible for continued processing for his security clearance!

  • U.S. Coast Guard Favorable Response

    Guideline E

    July 16, 2011

    On July 16, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the U.S. Coast Guard Center on behalf of Applicant and successfully mitigated the Government’s concerns without the need for a hearing. The Government raised security concerns under Guideline E – Personal Conduct and Guideline J – Criminal Conduct. The Government allegations against Applicant included conduct involving prostitutes, child pornography, falsifying documents, and improper storage, transportation and removal of classified information. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted a written argument and documentary evidence to provide Applicant was trustworthy, reliable and not a risk to national security. The Edmunds Law Firm prevailed in the written response alone and Applicant was found eligible to maintain his security clearance.

  • NSA Security Clearance Granted

    Guideline H

    July 15, 2011

    On July 15, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the National Security Agency (NSA) Central Security Service on behalf of Applicant and was successful in mitigating the Government’s concern without the need for a hearing. In this case, there were drug involvement and personal conduct concerns pertaining to Guideline H and Guideline E respectively. The Government alleged that Applicant was a risk to national security because he used prescription drugs with alcohol for a euphoric felling. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove that Applicant was trustworthy, reliable, and not a risk to national security. The Edmunds Law Firm prevailed in the written response alone and Applicant was found eligible for continued processing for his security clearance!

  • Victory For Client With Guideline B Accusation!

    July 15, 2011

    Guideline B Accusation

    On July 15, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The hearing for this matter was held before a DOHA Administrative Judge on June 24th 2011 in Arlington, Virginia. In this case, there were allegations pertaining to Guideline B- Foreign Influence, Guideline C- Foreign Preference, and Guideline E- Personal Conduct. The Government alleged that the applicant could be a risk to national security because of the Applicant’s close family ties to citizens and residents of Syria, the Applicant’s preference for Brazil over the United States, and deliberate falsification during the security clearance process concerning his history of alcohol related arrests and marijuana use. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove that Applicant was trustworthy, reliable, and not a risk to national security. The Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant’s security clearance.

  • Applicant Security Clearance Granted

    Guideline F

    On July 11, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received written notification of a favorable decision made in a security clearance matter. The hearing for this matter was held before a DOHA Administrative Judge on January 20, 2011 in San Diego, CA. In this case, there were security clearance concerns pertaining to Guideline F – Financial Considerations and Guideline E -Personal Conduct. The evidence showed Applicant had 20 outstanding debts and 18 personal conduct concerns. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to demonstrate through witness testimony and documentary evidence that the Applicant was trustworthy, and met the eligibility requirements for access to classified information. Upon consideration of the evidence presented and oral argument, the Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant’s security clearance.

  • Favorable Response Determination

    Department of Homeland Security

    On June 20, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the US Department of Homeland Security on behalf of Applicant and was successful in mitigating the Government’s concern without the need for a hearing. In this case, there were allegations of pertaining to Guideline E- Personal Conduct, as well as, Guideline — Use of Information Technology Systems. The Government alleged that Applicant was a risk to national security due to the storage and viewing of sexually oriented materials on a state computer system. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove that Applicant was trustworthy, reliable, and not a risk to national security. The Edmunds Law Firm prevailed in the written response alone and Applicant was found eligible to maintain his security clearance.

  • DOHA Hearing Victory For Guideline E Applicant

    Victory For Guideline E Applicant

    May 30, 2011

    On May 30, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The hearing for this matter was held before a DOHA Administrative Judge on May 25th 2011 in Arlington, Virginia. In this case, there personal conduct concerns pertaining to Guideline E. The Government alleged that due to sexual misconduct, the Applicant was convicted by members at a special court-martial of various offences and was sentenced to be discharged with a Bad Conduct Discharge. The Applicant also submitted false statements in a warrants application of DC. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove that Applicant was trustworthy, reliable, and not a risk to national security. The Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with national interests to grant the Applicant’s security clearance.

  • Written Response Granted

    U.S. Department of State
    Personal Conduct
    Financial Considerations
    April 21, 2011

    On April 21, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable decision in an employment suitability matter. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response on behalf of Applicant and was successful in mitigating the Government’s concern without the need for a hearing. In this case, there was an employment suitability concern pertaining to Guideline F – Financial Considerations and Guideline E-Personal Conduct. The Government alleged that Applicant’s fitness for contract employment was questionable due to a divorce and a second mortgage on a property as well as other concerns. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove that Applicant was fit and suitable for employment. The Edmunds Law Firm prevailed in the written response alone and Applicant was found eligible for employment with his company!

  • Written Response Granted

    U.S. Department of State
    Personal Conduct
    April 20, 2011

    On April 20, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable decision in an employment suitability matter. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response on behalf of Applicant and was successful in mitigating the Government’s concern without the need for a hearing. In this case, there was an employment suitability concern pertaining to Guideline E-Personal Conduct. The Government alleged that Applicant’s fitness for contract employment was questionable due to a termination with a previous company for misconduct concerns. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted written argument and documentary evidence to prove that Applicant was fit and suitable for employment. The Edmunds Law Firm prevailed in the written response alone and Applicant was found eligible for employment with his company!

  • Department of Energy Hearing

    September 14, 2016
    Criterion J; (Alcohol Consumption)
    Livermore, CA

    A Summary of Security Concerns was issued to an employee of the Department of Energy (DOE) by the DOE for Alcohol-related issues. It was alleged that the Applicant was diagnosed with using alcohol habitually to excess which raised serious trust and judgment concerns for the Government. Applicant requested a hearing, and the case was heard in front of a DOE Administrative Judge, with Mr. Nerney representing this employee. Mr. Nerney presented numerous mitigating conditions that were in support of Applicant’s case. Furthermore, this hearing involved an expert witness called on behalf of the Government and Mr. Nerney was able to successfully cross-examine the Government’s expert witness to develop a favorable view of the Applicant’s alcohol consumption. With Mr. Nerney’s experience, and the support of the staff at the Edmunds Law Firm, this case was decided in Applicant’s favor on all allegations. As a result, the Government’s concerns were mitigated, and the employee was able to continue with his career working for the Department of Energy with a valid security clearance.

  • DODCAF Written Response

    Guideline F – 25 allegations
    Guideline B
    Boise, Idaho

    A Federal Employee received a Statement of Reasons for Financial Allegations (Tax Lien’s, Unpaid Taxes, Collection Accounts Unpaid) and Foreign Influence (Working for a foreign family (Saudi Arabia). Mr. Edmunds and his staff responded the allegations listed in the Statement of Reasons through a professionally written response. After the Response was submitted and received by DODCAF, notification was received by The Edmunds Law Firm from the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals that stated: “due to the additional information provided regarding the allegations listed in the Statement of Reasons, the Government Withdraws the Statement of Reasons, and the Security Clearance is granted.” Another example of the professional services provided by The Edmunds Law Firm.

  • DOHA

    May 19, 2013
    Guideline B
    San Diego, California

    The client was issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) indicating she was denied access to security clearance because of Foreign Influence under Guideline B. The client had a foreign passport, foreign relatives and foreign financial interest. The Edmunds Law Firm, through client testimony and supporting documents, was able to mitigate the foreign influence concern, leading to a favorable security clearance decision for our client. On May 19, 2013, the client informed the Edmunds Law Firm that her security clearance was reinstated and she could continue on with her career.

  • FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE DETERMINATION

    December 21, 2012
    ACAF – Guideline F

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of yet another favorable security clearance determination as a result of a written Response to Statement of Reasons. This case in particular involved Guideline F, Financial Considerations. Applicant had incurred nearly $20,000.00 in debt as a result of an immediate family member’s legal issues. Through both the written Response and supportive documentation, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concerns regarding Applicant’s past financial issues and the individual’s security clearance was successfully reinstated.

  • FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE DETERMINATION

    December 26, 2012
    AFCAF – Guideline F

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of another favorable security clearance determination as a result of the Reapplication Brief prepared by the Edmunds Law Firm on behalf of the Applicant. This case involved Guideline F, Financial Considerations. Applicant was issued a Statement of Reasons, wherein a written response was submitted to the Agency, however, Applicant failed to mitigate the government’s concerns. After waiting the required one (1) year time frame, Applicant sought assistance from the Edmunds Law Firm in the reapplication process. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted the Reapplication Brief for security clearance, along with ample supportive documentation. The government’s concerns regarding Applicant’s past financial issues were successfully mitigated and Applicant’s security clearance was successfully reinstated.

  • FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE DETERMINATION

    January 31, 2013
    DONCAF – Guideline F

    The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of yet another favorable security clearance determination as a result of the written Response to Statement of Reasons, prepared by the Edmunds Law Firm on behalf of the Applicant. This case in particular involved Guideline F, Financial Considerations. Applicant was issued a Statement of Reasons outlining concerns regarding several financial delinquencies, as well as a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy filing. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared the written Response to Statement of Reasons, along with significant supportive documentation. The government’s concerns regarding Applicant’s past financial issues were successfully mitigated and Applicant’s security clearance was successfully reinstated.

  • Guideline B – Foreign Influence

    March 4,2013
    Arlington, VA.
    Country: China

    The Edmunds Law Firm obtained a favorable decision from DOHA on a case involving Foreign Influence and Foreign Preference involving an applicant with contacts in China.
    After reviewing the evidence submitted to the gov’t attorney a decision was made to withdraw the SOR and allow the applicant to proceed with her clearance.
    The Edmunds Law Firm helps security clearance applicants around the globe – both military and civilian.
    Mr. Edmunds represents clients in all phases of the security clearance process and before all gov’t Agencies. If you have a case before NSA, DIA, FBI, CIA, or DOE call 800 481 2526 for guidance. Your career and reputation is too important.

  • FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE DETERMINATION

    February 2013
    Interrogatories on Financial Concerns

    February 2013 – Client’s clearance reinstated after responding to Interrogatories on Financial Concerns. Client had co-signed a mortgage for his son, but unknown to the client, his son stopped paying the mortgage and the home was foreclosed. Clearance to client reinstated and full access to classified information resumed.

  • FAVORABLE SECURITY CLEARANCE DECISION

    March 18, 2013
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Guideline F

    The Edmunds Law Firm received yet another favorable decision from an Administrative Law Judge, involving an individual who’s security clearance was revoked due to allegations involving Guideline F, failure and inability to live within ones means. The case went to a formal hearing in Woodland Hills. The Applicant had a total of eight debts that were alleged to be delinquent or in collections by the Government. The case was handled on behalf of the Edmunds Law Firm by Attorney Paula W. Phinney. Ms. Phinney took oral testimony, introduced documentary evidence and made argument concerning mitigating factors.

    At the conclusion of the case the Judge took the matter under submission and rendered a written decision in favor of the Applicant, the Client of the Edmunds Law Firm. Guideline F cases are very difficult to win, they require a great deal of experience on behalf of the Attorney and a great deal of documentary evidence. The Edmunds Law Firm is very experienced with these types of cases and Attorney Alan V. Edmunds has successfully litigated these cases from coast to coast. The Edmunds Law Firm is a recognized leader in the area of security clearance representation. This case was particularly important because the Applicant’s career was saved and the employment situation, which could of resulted in termination, was avoided.

  • DOHA

    April 2013
    Guideline F
    Arlington, Virginia

    The client retained the Edmunds Law Firm to complete a re-application for security clearance. His security clearance was revoked due to financial concerns under Guideline F. The client had approximately $30,000 in financial considerations. Through the re-application process, the Edmunds Law Firm was able to mitigate the government’s concerns under Guideline F without the need to attend a formal hearing and the client’s security clearance was reinstated.

  • Department of the Army

    May 2013
    Guidelines E and J
    Fort George G. Meade, Maryland

    The client’s security clearance was revoked by the government, which stated the client had committed “War crimes-maltreatment of a dead body.” The government issued the client a Statement of Reasons (SOR) claiming that Guidelines E and J were violated. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to successfully mitigate the government’s Personal Conduct and Criminal Conduct concerns with a response to the SOR. Without the need for a formal hearing, the client received a favorable decision in the security clearance matter, reinstating his security clearance.