-
Military CasesAlan V. Edmunds has Been Nationally Recognized for Success in Representing Defendants in Military Cases.
-
National Security ClearancesProviding Experienced & Representation in the Most Complex Security Clearance Matters, Nationwide.
-
Government Security ClearancesHandling Government Clearance Security Matters for Civilians, Active Members of the U.S. Military, Contractors and Government Employees Across the Country.
-
FBI Security ClearancesProviding Thorough and Experienced Legal Counsel in FBI Security Clearance Matters for More Than 30 Years.
Written Response Help
You may need help writing a legal response if you've been summoned or have received a complaint against you. If so, you can rely on the lawyers at The Edmunds Law Firm to help with this task. Our attorneys have been assisting clients with writing legal responses for more than 30 years.
When submitting a written legal response, you cannot just sit down and write a letter. A written response is a legal document that can be later used against you if it is not carefully and professionally written.
A poorly written or incomplete response can result in your being denied a national security clearance or the right to a hearing. Writing written responses are an integral part of any law practice. At The Edmunds Law Firm we are able to win positive judgments for our clients through a well written legal response.
Examples of successful written legal responses include:
- A well-written legal response to a security agency enabled an applicant for security clearance to obtain employment by addressing government concerns about his marijuana use and lack of judgment. The applicant did not even need a hearing because the response satisfied the agency's concerns.
- The Edmunds Law Firm was able to allay government concerns about the fitness of an applicant for a security clearance because of a divorce and failure to satisfy a debt.
- A client who applied for a government security clearance was helped by attorneys at The Edmunds Law Firm when he applied for contract employment. The client had been let go from a previous job for misconduct. The Edmunds Law Firm was able to show in a written response that the client would indeed be a valuable worker and was able to address the government's apprehensions about his suitability for employment.
- A man's national security clearance was denied because of a gap in employment history, debt, and charges of smuggling steroids into the country from Mexico. Our law firm, through a written legal response, was able to satisfy the government agency's concerns and obtained his job for him without the need for a hearing.
Written legal responses are required at many levels of the judicial process, whether in cases of national security, family law or otherwise. Having an experienced, successful lawyer prepare the response is your best approach for attaining your goals.
Contact The Edmunds Law Firm Today
If you need help with a written response, contact The Edmunds Law Firm today. Our attorneys have been assisting people with National Security Clearance matters for the past three decades and would be happy to help you. Contact our national security clearance attorneys for an evaluation on your case.
Social Media
National Security Clearances
- National Security Clearances
- Government Security Clearances
- Military Security Clearances
- DoD Security Clearances
- FBI Security Clearances
- Obtaining a Security Clearance
- Security Clearance Attorney
- Security Clearance Denial
- SF86 Document Preparation
- Security Clearance Appeals
- Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals
- Written Response Help
- Investigation Preparation
- Polygraph Help
- Formal Hearing Help
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Bankruptcy and Security Clearances
- DUIs and Security Clearances
Recent Victories
On November 17, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the National Security Agency on behalf of the Applicant. The firm was successful in mitigating the security concerns under Guideline J: Criminal Conduct, Guideline F: Financial Considerations and Guideline E: Personal Conduct, without the need for a hearing. The allegations against the Applicant pertained to $100,000 worth of stolen equipment from his former employer and failing to claim up to $10,000 worth of purchases on his state income taxes. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted a letter of appeal and supporting documentation to prove the Applicant had taken actions to rectify and mitigate those behaviors which resulted in the original denial decision. The firm prevailed and the Applicant was found eligible to maintain his security clearance.
