Recent Victories

Testimonials on Behalf of Our Security Clearance Representation

This is what one of our client's said when he received a letter from our firm regarding a favorable decision on his case..." Thanks for the positive news. I will certainly recommend your law firm within my company and others."

"Thank you and your associates for all your legal advice and services throughout my challenges with DOHA and my efforts to obtain a security clearance. During the hearing…I could not have asked for a better attorney to present my case to [the] Judge…Your legal approach was strong, well prepared, and most professional…Please extend my gratitude to all members of your team. Thank you for a job well done."
J. Mayer, Santee, CA

"I would like to thank you very much for all the help and support you have provided for me for this case. I truly appreciate all the work that has been done on my behalf for this favorable decision...If there is anything more that you may need, please let me know. Thank you again."
-Applicant, San Diego, CA

"Thank you very much. I am extremly happy on the decicison and do not feel I could have put together an appeal letter on my own. It's been a please to have worked with you and the rest of the team."
-Applicant, Eldersburg, MD

"You made my day. This is the best to hear in 2010. I'm so happy and proud to have your law firm to represent me in my case. I for sure will recommend this firm to all people need such help. Again, thank you so much for all you did for me."
-Applicant, San Diego, CA

"I'm following up on my case. I was granted a Security Clearance in November and am now working in Afghanistan...Thank you so much for all of your help. I truly appreciate everything."
-Applicant, San Diego, CA

Security Clearance Victories and Press Releases

PROPOSED SUSPENSION FROM DUTY OVERTURNED

February 17, 2010
Fort Bliss, Texas

A favorable decision was made on February 17, 2010 with regards to a security clearance matter. This case involved an individual who received a Proposed Suspension from Duty without pay and a decision letter of proposed suspension. The client retained the Edmunds Law Firm and representation followed, which included the involvement of an expert forensic psychologist. This law firm prepared documents that were then submitted to the client's Command/Employer and the proposed action was withdrawn. This individual's security clearance was then reinstated.

For legal assistance with matters similar to the above, please contact the Edmunds Law Firm at (800) 481-2526 or online at www.nationalsecurityclearances.com .

GUIDELINE B

Foreign Influence
January 25, 2010
San Diego, California
Case No.:  08-06792

On January 25, 2010, the Edmunds Law Firm received written notification of a favorable decision made by the Administrative Judge with regards to a Response to a Statement of Reasons (SOR) in a security clearance matter. The hearing for this matter was held in San Diego, California on August 19, 2009. In this case, security concerns pertaining to Guideline B, Foreign Influence, were involved. Although Applicant has foreign family members who are residents and citizens of Iraq, Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate this concern, using numerous letters of recommendation, performance evaluations and Certificates of Appreciation. Attorney Edmunds also used witness testimony and then made the final argument. Upon consideration of the evidence presented, the Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with the national interests to grant Applicant's security clearance.

If either you or someone you know has been denied a security clearance, contact the Edmunds Law Firm at (800) 481-2526 to see how we can assist you. 

MILITARY

Criminal Matter
January 15, 2010
San Francisco, California
Case No.: BB943806 and BB943807

The Edmunds Law Firm recently received a favorable decision from a criminal law judge in a case where two active duty Marines were arrested and charged with alcohol related offences. Attorney Samuel Bluck, of the firm, appeared in court on behalf of his clients where he presented their cases. Upon consideration of the evidence presented, the Judge dismissed all charges against both individuals.

GUIDELINES E & J

Personal Conduct and Criminal Conduct
Case No.:  Q235-10703-10
January 15, 2010

On January 15, 2010 the Edmunds Law Fir received notification from the National Security Agency (NSA) that a favorable decision was made with regards to their written response to a Statement of Reasons (SOR). Winning a National Security allegation by only a written response is an outstanding result. In this situation, allegations of Personal Conduct and Criminal Conduct, Guidelines E and J, were involved. Attorney Stephanie Mendez, of the Edmunds Law Firm, prepared the written response to the SOR and was able to not only save our client's career, but allow them to further themselves in their career.

If either yourself or an individual that you know has received a Statement of Reasons (SOR) or Letter of Intent (LOI), please do not hesitate to contact the Edmunds Law Firm at (800) 481-2526 to see how we can be of service to you.

GUIDELINE F

Financial Consideration Allegation
Case No.: 08-11940
December 15, 2009

On December 15, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm was granted yet another favorable decision by the Administrative Judge in a National Security Clearance matter, proving once again that experience makes the difference. This particular case involved an applicant who is a 33 year old federal contractor. Applicant has a significant amount of financial debt and was issued a Statement of Reasons outlining the Government's financial concerns. Upon considering the evidence and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information, please contact Alan V. Edmunds at (800) 481-2526.

GUIDELINES E & J

Personal Conduct and Criminal Conduct
Case No.: 08-06209
December 11, 2009

The Edmunds Law Firm received notification on December 11, 2009 that a favorable decision was made by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security Clearance matter with regards to a Response to Statement of Reasons (SOR). In this situation, allegations of Personal Conduct and Criminal Conduct, Guidelines E and J, were involved. Security concerns arose during Applicant's background investigation as a result of three previous arrests, and deliberately falsifying material facts pertaining to these arrests. Attorney Edmunds submitted numerous exhibits, took testimony and made the final argument. After weighing all of the facts and circumstances of the case, the Administrative Judge found that it was clearly consistent with national interest to grant Applicant a security clearance.

If either you or a co-worker has received an SOR or a Letter of Intent (LOI) from the government, please do not hesitate to contact The Edmunds Law Firm at 800-481-2526.

GUIDELINES E & H

Personal Conduct and Drug Involvement
November 23, 2009

The Edmunds Law Firm received notification on November 23, 2009 that their written response to a Statement of Reasons (SOR) from the National Security Agency (NSA) was successful. In this situation, allegations of Personal Conduct and Drug Involvement, Guidelines E and H, were involved. Winning a National Security allegation against a client by simply responding to an SOR is unusual and an incredible result. Attorney Stephanie Mendez, in the firm, prepared a written response to an SOR that saved our client's career and allowed this individual to continue on in their career as a professional.

If you or a co-worker has received an SOR or a Letter of Intent (LOI) from the government, please do not hesitate to contact The Edmunds Law Firm at 800-481-2526.

GUIDELINE H

Drug Involvement
Case No.: TSO-0783
November 9, 2009

On November 9, 2009, the Administrative Law Judge gave notice of a favorable decision to our client with regards to restoring this individual's security clearance. This National Security case was heard on September 2, 2009 with the Department of Enegry in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The case involved Criterion L (Guideline H), specifically pertaining to drug use. Attorney Randi Walker was able mitigate all concerns that were raised with regards to Applicant, by taking testimony, submitting numerous exhibits and making the final argument. Attorney Walker successfully restored the Applicant's security clearance, allowing this individual to move forward in their career.

To receive more information regarding security clearances, please contact The Edmunds Law Firm at 800-481-2526.

GUIDELINE B

Foreign Influence
Case No.: 08-11252
October 28, 2009

The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision on October 28, 2009 on a National Security case. The hearing was held in San Diego, California on August 19, 2009. This case involved Guideline B and the specific facts pertained to Foreign Influence, specifically because Applicant's parents were both citizens and residents of South Korea. Concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons were due to the contact between Applicant and family members residing in a foreign country. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate these concerns and show that there is little likelihood of there being a risk for Foreign Influence as well as there being no conflict of interest between Applicant and South Korea. The clearance was granted to Applicant, allowing this individual to continue moving on in their career.

If you or someone you know has had their clearance revoked or been denied a clearance due to similar reasons, please contact the Edmunds Law Firm today to see how we can help you.

GUIDELINES B & C

Foreign Preference and Foreign influence
Case No.: 08-02864
September 16, 2009

On September 16, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm was granted a favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security Clearance case proving that experience makes the difference. Case number 08-02864 involved an applicant who received a Statement of Reasons based on Guidelines B & C, specifically because of his family ties in Germany and Iran. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons. Upon considering the volumes of exhibits, witness testimony and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant on each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. Contact Attorney Alan V. Edmunds at 800-481-2526 to see how he can help you.

GUIDELINE B

Foreign Influences
Case No.: 08-04776
September 14, 2009

On September 14, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm was granted a favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security Clearance case proving that experience makes the difference. Case number 08-04776 involved an applicant who received a Statement of Reasons based on Guideline B, specifically because of the Applicant's ties to family in Hong Kong. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons. Upon considering the volumes of exhibits, witness testimony and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant on each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information, please contact Attorney Edmunds at 800-481-2526.

GUIDELINES E, G, H & J

Personal Conduct, Alcohol Consumption, Drug Involvement, Criminal Conduct Allegations
August 19, 2009

The Edmunds Law Firm received a favorable decision and a reversal of a Decision to Revoke Eligibility for Access from the Defense Intelligence Agency. This incredible victory was dated August 19, 2009. This demonstrates that "experience makes the difference."

The Edmunds Law Firm was retained to respond to a Denial of Access based on allegations concerning misuse of alcoholic beverages and alcohol related incidents. The Government felt that the abuse of alcohol adversely reflected upon this individuals trustworthiness or reliability.

The Edmunds Law Firm prepared a very powerful and compelling argument rebutting the assertions. In a decision that will become a landmark, our client was granted access to compartmental information without the necessity of a Formal Hearing.

If you or other individuals you know are facing Decisions to Revoke, Letters of Intent to Revoke or have been given a Statement of Reasons and you want professional help that includes a law firm with a incredible track record, please do not hesitate to contact The Edmunds Law Firm.

GUIDELINE E

Personal Conduct
Case No.: 08-04241
July 23, 2009

On July 23, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm, was granted yet another favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security Clerance case proving that experience makes the difference. Case number 08-04241 involved an applicant who received a Letter of Intent to Deny Security Clearance based on Guideline E. Specifically, the Applicant was being investigated for smoking a marijuana cigarette while holding a Security Clearance in 2005 and omitting information in the e-Qip about the Marijuana incident. During the hearing Attorney Edmunds took several witnesses under direct examination to testify as to the Applicant’s trustworthiness and character. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons. Upon considering the evidence, witness testimony, and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information please contact Attorney Alan Edmunds at 800-481-2526.

GUIDELINE B & C

Foreign Preference
Case No.: 08-04535
July 13, 2009

On July 13, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm, was granted yet another favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security Clearance case proving that experience makes the difference. Case number 08-04535 involved an applicant who received a Letter of Intent to Deny Security Clearance based on Guidelines B and C. Specifically, the Applicant was being investigated for having dual citizenship with Algeria and the United States, applying and being issued an Algerian passport in 2007, even though the applicant had become a Naturalized United States citizen in 1992. In addition, Applicant was being investigated for father, brothers, sisters, father-in-law and sister-in-law being residents and/or citizens of Algeria. During the hearing Attorney Edmunds took several witnesses under direct examination to testify as to the Applicant’s trustworthiness and character. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons. Upon considering the evidence, witness testimony, and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information please contact Attorney Alan Edmunds at 800-481-2526.

GUIDELINE B

Foreign Influence
Case No.: 08-07687
July 6, 2009

On July 6, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm, was granted yet another favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security Clearance case proving that experience makes the difference. Case number 08-07687 involved an applicant who received a Letter of Intent to Deny Security Clearance based on Guideline B. Specifically, the Applicant was being investigated for the applicant's mother, sisters and mother-in-law being citizens and residents of Iraq and brother being a citizen of Iraq and resident of Jordan. Additionally, the applicant had traveled to Jordan in 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2008. During the hearing Attorney Edmunds took several witnesses under direct examination to testify as to the Applicant’s trustworthiness and character. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons. Upon considering the evidence, witness testimony, and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information please contact Attorney Alan Edmunds at 800-481-2526.

GUIDELINE B

Foreign Influence Allegation
Case No.: 07-04462
May 22, 2009

The Edmunds Law Firm has recently received another favorable decision in a National Security case proving once again, that experience makes the difference. Case number 07-04662 involved an applicant with foreign influence allegations. The Department of Hearings and Appeals intended to revoke the applicant’s security clearance based upon Guideline B. Specifically, Applicant was being investigated due to Applicant’s family being citizens of Portugal (Macao) and residing in Hong Kong. In addition, the Applicant had traveled to China (to include Hong Kong and/or Macao) on four different occasions and to Taiwan on two different occasions. During the hearing Attorney Green took several witnesses under direct examination to testify as to the Applicant’s trustworthiness and character. Attorney Green was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons. Upon considering the evidence, witness testimony, and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information please contact Attorney Alan Edmunds at 800-481-2526.

GUIDELINE E

Personal Conduct Allegations
Case No.: TSO-0696
April 14, 2009

On April 14, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm, was granted yet another favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security case proving that experience makes the difference. Case number TSO-0696 involved an applicant who received a Letter of Intent to Deny Security Clearance based on Guideline E. Specifically, Applicant was being investigated for wrongfully possessing a privately owned firearm and wrongfully shipping a firearm out of a foreign country. Attorney Alan Edmunds submitted several items into evidence. Applicant and several witness testified. Upon evaluation the Judge found that is was clearly consistent with the national interest to grant the Applicant’s security clearance. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at www.nationalsecurityclearances.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526.

GUIDELINES B, E, H & J

Foreign Influence, Personal Conduct, Criminal Conduct and Drug Involvement Allegations
Case No.: 08-12062
March 26, 2009

On March 26, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm, was granted yet another favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security case proving that experience makes the difference. Case number 08-12062 involved a 26 year old applicant who received a Letter of Intent to Deny Security Clearance based on Guidelines B, E, H and J. Specifically, Applicant was being investigated for having a relationship with a friend who attended college with applicant but was born in China and the use of Marijuana in 2006 and 2007. The attorney submitted several items into evidence. Upon evaluation the Judge found that is was clearly consistent with the national interest to grant the Applicant’s security clearance. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at www.nationalsecurityclearances.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526.

GUIDELINES E & F

Personal Conduct and Financial Consideration Allegations
Case No.: 07-15281
February 27, 2009

On February 27, 2009, The Edmunds Law Firm, was granted yet another favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security case proving that experience makes the difference. Case number 07-15281 involved a 53 year old applicant who received a Letter of Intent to Deny Security Clearance based on Guidelines E and F. Specifically, Applicant was being investigated for Inaccurate Time and Attendance Records and Misuse of the Government Travel Charge Card for Unauthorized Personal Expenses from March 28, 2002 to January 10, 2003. Attorney Alan Edmunds submitted several items into evidence. Applicant and 1 witness testified. Upon evaluation the Judge found that is was clearly consistent with the national interest to grant the Applicant’s security clearance. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at www.nationalsecurityclearances.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526.

GUIDELINES E & H

Personal Conduct and Drug Involvement Allegations
Case No.: 08-02118
January 26, 2009

The Edmunds Law Firm has recently received another favorable decision in a National Security case proving once again, that experience makes the difference. Case number 08-02118 involved an applicant with drug allegations. The Department of Hearings and Appeals intended to revoke the applicant’s security clearance based upon Guideline E and Guideline H. Specifically, Applicant was being investigated due to use of Marijuana and Cocaine use for a period of approximately 3 years. In addition, the government had concerns regarding the Applicant’s reliability and trustworthiness. During the hearing Attorney Edmunds took several witnesses under direct examination to testify as to the Applicant’s trustworthiness and character. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons. Upon considering the evidence, witness testimony, and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information please contact Attorney Alan Edmunds at 800-481-2526.

GUIDELINES E & H

Personal Conduct and Drug Involvement Allegations
Case No.: TSO-0653
December 23, 2008

The Edmunds Law Firm has recently received another favorable decision in a National Security case proving once again, that experience makes the difference. Case number TSO-0653 involved an applicant with drug allegations. The Department of Hearings and Appeals intended to revoke the applicant’s security clearance based upon Guideline E and Guideline H. Specifically, Applicant was being investigated due to use of Marijuana 50 times in approximately six years, Cocaine use 2 times in a period of approximately 1 year and Ecstasy 12 times in a period of approximately 1 year. In addition, the applicant was also being investigated for sales of these drugs. During the hearing Attorney Green took several witnesses under direct examination to testify as to the Applicant’s trustworthiness and character. Attorney Green was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons. Upon considering the evidence, witness testimony, and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information please contact Attorney Alan Edmunds at 800-481-2526.

GUIDELINE B

Foreign Influence Allegation
Case No.: 07-04462
May 22, 2008

On May 22, 2008 The Edmunds Law Firm, was granted yet another favorable decision by the Administrative Law Judge in a National Security case proving that experience makes the difference. Case number 07-04462 involved a 39 year old applicant who received a Letter of Intent to Deny Security Clearance based on Guideline B (Foreign Influence). Attorney James Green submitted several items into evidence. The applicant and five witnesses testified. Upon evaluation the Judge found that is was clearly consistent with the national interest to grant the Applicant’s security clearance. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at www.nationalsecurityclearances.com or by phone at (800) 481-2526.

MILITARY DISCHARGE UPGRADE

Case No.: AR20070005186
March 10, 2008

The Edmunds Law Firm has received another favorable decision, this time from the Department of the Army, Army Discharge Review Board. On March 10, 2008, case number AR20070005186 was upgraded from a discharge Under Other than Honorable Conditions to a General Discharge, Under Honorable Conditions. Attorney James W. Green has shown, once again, that experience makes the difference. Attorney Green appeared in front of the Army Discharge Review Board to present the Applicant’s case and was able to prove that the characterization of the service was too harsh. As a result the Board determined that the characterization was inequitable and granted relief in the form of a upgrade of to a General Discharge, Under Honorable Conditions. The Edmunds Law Firm represents individuals throughout the world with regard to Military matters. For more information please contact The Edmunds Law Firm at (800) 481-2526.

GUIDELINES B & C

Foreign Influence and Foreign Preference Allegations
Case No.: 07-13232

Attorney Alan V. Edmunds of The Edmunds Law Firm has recently received another favourable decision in a National Security case proving once again, that experience makes the difference. Case number 07-13232 involved an applicant with dual citizenship in India and the U.S. The Department of Defense intended to revoke the applicant’s security clearance based upon Guideline B and Guideline C. During the hearing Attorney Edmunds took several witnesses under direct examination to testify as to the applicant’s trustworthiness and character. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons. Upon considering the evidence, witness testimony, and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information please contact Attorney Alan Edmunds at 800-481-2526.

GUIDELINES B & C

Foreign Influence and Foreign Preference
Case No.: 07-04529

Attorney Alan V. Edmunds of The Edmunds Law Firm has recently received another favourable decision in a National Security case proving once again, that experience makes the difference. Case number 07-04529 involved an applicant with dual citizenship in Germany and the U.S. The Department of Defense intended to revoke the applicant’s security clearance based upon Guideline B and Guideline C. During the hearing Attorney Edmunds took several witnesses under direct examination to testify as to the applicant’s trustworthiness and character. Attorney Edmunds was able to mitigate all of the concerns raised in the Statement of Reasons. Upon considering the evidence, witness testimony, and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information please contact Attorney Alan Edmunds at 800-481-2526.

GUIDELINE F

Financial Consideration Allegation

Attorney James W. Green of The Edmunds Law Firm has recently won another National Security case proving once again that experience makes the difference. This particular case involved an applicant who is a 42 year old defense contractor and served in the United States Army for 20 years. Applicant had a significant amount of financial debt and was issued a Statement of Reasons outlining the Government’s financial concerns. Upon considering the evidence and the statements of counsel, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at (800) 481-2526.

GUIDELINE F

Financial Consideration Allegation
Case No.: 07-03059

Attorney Alan V. Edmunds of The Edmunds Law Firm has recently won another National Security case proving once again that experience makes the difference. This particular case, ISCR Case No. 07-03059, involved an applicant who is a 48 year old woman and became and independent contractor. Applicant had a significant amount of financial debt and was issued a Statement of Reasons outlining the Government’s specific financial concerns. Upon considering the evidence, hearing the statements of counsel, and witness testimony, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds (800) 481-2526.

GUIDELINE F

Financial Concern Allegation
Case No.: 07-03694

Attorney Alan V. Edmunds of The Edmunds Law Firm has recently won another National Security case proving once again that experience makes the difference. This particular case, ISCR Case No. 07-03694, involved an applicant who is a 36 year old male and worked for a federal contractor. Applicant had a significant amount of financial debt and was issued a Statement of Reasons outlining the Government’s specific financial concerns. Upon considering the evidence, hearing the statements of counsel, and witness testimony, the Administrative Law Judge found in favor of the Applicant for each and every allegation raised in the Statement of Reasons. For more information please contact Alan V. Edmunds at (800) 481-2526.