How to Apply for a Security Clearance

The process for obtaining a security clearance depends in part on the agency that is providing the clearance, but since the vast majority of security clearances are obtained through the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), the DoD process will be summarized here. The Edmunds Law Firm can help applicants with the process to obtain any type of security clearance. Having helped hundreds of individuals across the country obtain or retain their security clearance, the Edmunds Law Firm has extensive experience and knowledge in all stages of the process.

The Security Clearance Process

When a person is applying for a job that requires a security clearance, he or she will be required to:

  • Complete a number of forms
  • Supply a great deal of personal information
  • Be fingerprinted
  • Agree to a very thorough investigation of his or her past and present life
  • Undergo one or more interviews
  • Perhaps undergo a polygraph (lie detector) test
  • Agree to interviews of many of your acquaintances and people close to you

The SF-86 Security Clearance Questionnaire

The primary form to be completed is the standard form 86, or SF-86 security clearance questionnaire. You can get an idea of all the information that is required of an applicant by viewing this nearly 20-page form at the website of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). 

Understandably, the OPM has moved into the electronic age and has security clearance applicants complete the SF-86 online. The OPM's system for this process is called the "e-QIP" (Electronic Questionnaires for Investigations Processing). The e-QIP system can only be accessed by someone who has been invited to do so by an appropriate official at a sponsoring agency. This means a person cannot "pre-apply" for a security clearance, and someone who already has a security clearance cannot update or change his or her SF-86 unless granted access by an appropriate agency.

Security Clearance Attorneys Can Help

It's not unusual for a security clearance applicant to be concerned about some of the questions on the SF-86. If you are not sure whether you should reveal some of the information, it's a good idea to contact a skilled security clearance attorney such as Alan Edmunds. The same is true if you're asked to supply written responses to "interrogatories."

If an OPM agent finds what s/he considers an inconsistency, incorrect information, or falsehood in your SF-86 or other documents regarding your application, you may be contacted by the OPM and given a chance to clarify the matter. In other cases, the OPM will simply issue a "Statement of Reasons" describing the one or more reasons that the OPM is denying you a security clearance. At that point, it is in your best interest to contact Alan Edmunds; he has provided the representation that helped many individuals overcome this obstacle to a security clearance.

In some cases, it's appropriate and necessary to request a hearing before an Administrative Judge. This hearing is conducted to give the applicant a chance to argue against the security clearance denial. Legal representation in this hearing will make a critical difference. If the judge turns an applicant down at the hearing stage, the decision can be appealed.

Apply for Security Clearance Today!

For more information about applying for a security clearance, contact a security clearance attorney at The Edmunds Law Firm for a free initial consultation.

Alan Edmunds Contact Info

Social Media

Bookmark and Share

National Security Clearances

Recent Victories

On November 17, 2011, The Edmunds Law Firm received notification of a favorable security clearance determination. The Edmunds Law Firm prepared and submitted a written response to the National Security Agency on behalf of the Applicant. The firm was successful in mitigating the security concerns under Guideline J: Criminal Conduct, Guideline F: Financial Considerations and Guideline E: Personal Conduct, without the need for a hearing. The allegations against the Applicant pertained to $100,000 worth of stolen equipment from his former employer and failing to claim up to $10,000 worth of purchases on his state income taxes. The Edmunds Law Firm submitted a letter of appeal and supporting documentation to prove the Applicant had taken actions to rectify and mitigate those behaviors which resulted in the original denial decision. The firm prevailed and the Applicant was found eligible to maintain his security clearance.

More victories

Edmunds Law Firm BBB Business Review